1,583 research outputs found
Proving termination of evaluation for System F with control operators
We present new proofs of termination of evaluation in reduction semantics
(i.e., a small-step operational semantics with explicit representation of
evaluation contexts) for System F with control operators. We introduce a
modified version of Girard's proof method based on reducibility candidates,
where the reducibility predicates are defined on values and on evaluation
contexts as prescribed by the reduction semantics format. We address both
abortive control operators (callcc) and delimited-control operators (shift and
reset) for which we introduce novel polymorphic type systems, and we consider
both the call-by-value and call-by-name evaluation strategies.Comment: In Proceedings COS 2013, arXiv:1309.092
Relational Parametricity and Control
We study the equational theory of Parigot's second-order
λμ-calculus in connection with a call-by-name continuation-passing
style (CPS) translation into a fragment of the second-order λ-calculus.
It is observed that the relational parametricity on the target calculus induces
a natural notion of equivalence on the λμ-terms. On the other hand,
the unconstrained relational parametricity on the λμ-calculus turns
out to be inconsistent with this CPS semantics. Following these facts, we
propose to formulate the relational parametricity on the λμ-calculus
in a constrained way, which might be called ``focal parametricity''.Comment: 22 pages, for Logical Methods in Computer Scienc
Recommended from our members
Programming and proving with classical types
The propositions-as-types correspondence is ordinarily presen-
ted as linking the metatheory of typed λ-calculi and the proof theory
of intuitionistic logic. Griffin observed that this correspondence could
be extended to classical logic through the use of control operators. This
observation set off a flurry of further research, leading to the development
of Parigotâs λΌ-calculus. In this work, we use the λΌ-calculus as the
foundation for a system of proof terms for classical first-order logic. In
particular, we define an extended call-by-value λΌ-calculus with a type
system in correspondence with full classical logic. We extend the language
with polymorphic types, add a host of data types in âdirect styleâ, and
prove several metatheoretical properties. All of our proofs and definitions
are mechanised in Isabelle/HOL, and we automatically obtain an inter-
preter for a system of proof terms cum programming languageâcalled
ÎŒMLâusing Isabelleâs code generation mechanism. Atop our proof terms,
we build a prototype LCF-style interactive theorem proverâcalled ÎŒTPâ
for classical first-order logic, capable of synthesising ÎŒML programs from
completed tactic-driven proofs. We present example closed ÎŒML programs
with classical tautologies for types, including some inexpressible as closed
programs in the original λΌ-calculus, and some example tactic-driven
ÎŒTP proofs of classical tautologies
Logical relations for coherence of effect subtyping
A coercion semantics of a programming language with subtyping is typically
defined on typing derivations rather than on typing judgments. To avoid
semantic ambiguity, such a semantics is expected to be coherent, i.e.,
independent of the typing derivation for a given typing judgment. In this
article we present heterogeneous, biorthogonal, step-indexed logical relations
for establishing the coherence of coercion semantics of programming languages
with subtyping. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proof method, we develop
a proof of coherence of a type-directed, selective CPS translation from a typed
call-by-value lambda calculus with delimited continuations and control-effect
subtyping. The article is accompanied by a Coq formalization that relies on a
novel shallow embedding of a logic for reasoning about step-indexing
Koka: Programming with Row Polymorphic Effect Types
We propose a programming model where effects are treated in a disciplined
way, and where the potential side-effects of a function are apparent in its
type signature. The type and effect of expressions can also be inferred
automatically, and we describe a polymorphic type inference system based on
Hindley-Milner style inference. A novel feature is that we support polymorphic
effects through row-polymorphism using duplicate labels. Moreover, we show that
our effects are not just syntactic labels but have a deep semantic connection
to the program. For example, if an expression can be typed without an exn
effect, then it will never throw an unhandled exception. Similar to Haskell's
`runST` we show how we can safely encapsulate stateful operations. Through the
state effect, we can also safely combine state with let-polymorphism without
needing either imperative type variables or a syntactic value restriction.
Finally, our system is implemented fully in a new language called Koka and has
been used successfully on various small to medium-sized sample programs ranging
from a Markdown processor to a tier-splitted chat application. You can try out
Koka live at www.rise4fun.com/koka/tutorial.Comment: In Proceedings MSFP 2014, arXiv:1406.153
Type-Based Termination, Inflationary Fixed-Points, and Mixed Inductive-Coinductive Types
Type systems certify program properties in a compositional way. From a bigger
program one can abstract out a part and certify the properties of the resulting
abstract program by just using the type of the part that was abstracted away.
Termination and productivity are non-trivial yet desired program properties,
and several type systems have been put forward that guarantee termination,
compositionally. These type systems are intimately connected to the definition
of least and greatest fixed-points by ordinal iteration. While most type
systems use conventional iteration, we consider inflationary iteration in this
article. We demonstrate how this leads to a more principled type system, with
recursion based on well-founded induction. The type system has a prototypical
implementation, MiniAgda, and we show in particular how it certifies
productivity of corecursive and mixed recursive-corecursive functions.Comment: In Proceedings FICS 2012, arXiv:1202.317
- âŠ