95 research outputs found
Current established risk assessment methodologies and tools
The technology behind information systems evolves at an exponential rate, while at the same time becoming more and more ubiquitous. This brings with it an implicit rise in the average complexity of systems as well as the number of external interactions. In order to allow a proper assessment of the security of such (sub)systems, a whole arsenal of methodologies, methods and tools have been developed in recent years. However, most security auditors commonly use a very small subset of this collection, that best suits their needs. This thesis aims at uncovering the differences and limitations of the most common Risk Assessment frameworks, the conceptual models that support them, as well as the tools that implement them. This is done in order to gain a better understanding of the applicability of each method and/or tool and suggest guidelines to picking the most suitable one
Parameterization, Analysis, and Risk Management in a Comprehensive Management System with Emphasis on Energy and Performance (ISO 50001: 2018)
[EN] The future of business development relies on the effective management of risks, opportunities, and energy and water resources. Here, we evaluate the application of best practices to identify, analyze, address, monitor, and control risks and opportunities (R/O) according to ISO 31000 and 50000. Furthermore, we shed light on tools, templates, ISO guides, and international documents that contribute to classifying, identifying, formulating control, and managing R/O parameterization in a comprehensive management system model, namely CMS QHSE3+, which consists of quality (Q), health and safety (HS), environmental management (E), energy efficiency (E2), and other risk components (+) that include comprehensive biosecurity and biosafety. By focusing on the deployment of R/O-based thinking (ROBT) at strategic and operational levels, we show vulnerability reduction in CMS QHSE3+ by managing energy, efficiency, and sustainability.We express our gratitude for the support from Cajacopi Atlantico, QUARA Technology, ASTEQ Technology, Universidad Simon Bolivar, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia and to all the personnel and companies who offered us their contributions and their valuable points of view.Poveda-Orjuela, PP.; GarcΓa-DΓaz, JC.; Pulido-Rojano, A.; CaΓ±Γ³n-Zabala, G. (2020). Parameterization, Analysis, and Risk Management in a Comprehensive Management System with Emphasis on Energy and Performance (ISO 50001: 2018). Energies. 13(21):1-44. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215579S1441321SDBS Business Demography Indicatorshttps://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=70734The World Economy on a Tightrope. OECD Economic Outlook, June 2020http://www.oecd.org/economic-outlook/Strategic Plan 2016β2020www.https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/august/tradoc_154919.pdfSMEs, and Their Business Problems. Case Analysishttps://www.redalyc.org/pdf/206/20605209.pdfMuΓ±oz, P. (2013). The Distinctive Importance of Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Current Opinion in Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(1). doi:10.11565/cuocient.v2i1.26Parrish, B. D. (2010). Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 510-523. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.05.005Chaos Report 2015http://www.laboratorioti.com/2016/05/16/informe-del-caos-2015-chaos-report-2015/DirecciΓ³n de Marketing. Ciudad de MΓ©xico: Pearson and Prentice Hall, 12a EdiciΓ³nhttp://biblio.econ.uba.ar/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/tc/148262_TC.pdfPoveda-Orjuela, P. P., GarcΓa-DΓaz, J. C., Pulido-Rojano, A., & CaΓ±Γ³n-Zabala, G. (2019). ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus. Energies, 12(24), 4700. doi:10.3390/en12244700Continuity Planning for Your Businesshttps://www.westpac.com.au/content/dam/public/wbc/documents/pdf/help/disaster/WBC_business_continuity_planning_covid-19_checklist.pdfCOVID-19: Five Ways to Maintain Continuity and Reshape for Resiliencehttps://www.ey.com/en_be/transactions/companies-can-reshape-results-and-plan-forcovid-19-recoveryAven, T. (2012). The risk conceptβhistorical and recent development trends. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 99, 33-44. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.11.006Oliva, F. L. (2016). A maturity model for enterprise risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 173, 66-79. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.007Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2011). Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(1), 64-74. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.001The ISO 27k Forumhttps://www.iso27001security.com/html/iso27000.htmlKaya, Δ°. (2017). Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, 379-389. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67913-6_26Barafort, B., Mesquida, A.-L., & Mas, A. (2017). Integrating risk management in IT settings from ISO standards and management systems perspectives. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 54, 176-185. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2016.11.010Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023Thekdi, S., & Aven, T. (2016). An enhanced data-analytic framework for integrating risk management and performance management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 156, 277-287. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.010Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2013). Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Risk Analysis, 34(7), 1164-1172. doi:10.1111/risa.12132LabodovΓ‘, A. (2004). Implementing integrated management systems using a risk analysis based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 571-580. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.08.008World trends and the future of Latin America; ECLAC UNIDO, 2016βPublic Management Series, No 85. ISSN 1680-8827, LC/L.4246 LC/IP/L.348https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40788/S1600740_es.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yBudhi, M. K. S., Lestari, N. P. N. E., Suasih, N. N. R., & Wijaya, P. Y. (2020). Strategies and policies for developing SMEs based on creative economy. Management Science Letters, 2301-2310. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2020.3.005Melly, D., & Hanrahan, J. (2020). Tourism biosecurity risk management and planning: an international comparative analysis and implications for Ireland. Tourism Review, 76(1), 88-102. doi:10.1108/tr-07-2019-0312Guide for Business Continuity during COVID-19http://www.andi.com.co/Uploads.pdfLa Danse, 1910. Musee de lβHermitage, Saint-PΓ©tersbourg, Russie. ConsultΓ© le 28 Juillet 2020https://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/Uriarte-Romero, R., Gil-Samaniego, M., Valenzuela-Mondaca, E., & Ceballos-Corral, J. (2017). Methodology for the Successful Integration of an Energy Management System to an Operational Environmental System. Sustainability, 9(8), 1304. doi:10.3390/su9081304Cosgrove, J., Littlewood, J., & Wilgeroth, P. (2017). Development of a framework of key performance indicators to identify reductions in energy consumption in a medical devices production facility. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 39(2), 202-210. doi:10.1080/01430750.2017.1278718Wu, J., Cheng, B., Wang, M., & Chen, J. (2017). Quality-Aware Energy Optimization in Wireless Video Communication With Multipath TCP. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 25(5), 2701-2718. doi:10.1109/tnet.2017.2701153Biosecurity. Madridhttps://www.insst.es/-/bioseguridadArvanitis, S., Loukis, E., & Diamantopoulou, V. (2013). The effect of soft ICT capital on innovation performance of Greek firms. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 26(6), 679-701. doi:10.1108/jeim-07-2013-0048ICT in small firms: Factors affecting the adoption and use of ICT in Southeast England SMEshttps://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2008/167Legg, S. J., Olsen, K. B., Laird, I. S., & Hasle, P. (2015). Managing safety in small and medium enterprises. Safety Science, 71, 189-196. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.007PodgΓ³rski, D. (2015). Measuring operational performance of OSH management system β A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Safety Science, 73, 146-166. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.018Cagno, E., Micheli, G. J. L., Masi, D., & Jacinto, C. (2013). Economic evaluation of OSH and its way to SMEs: A constructive review. Safety Science, 53, 134-152. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.016Badri, A., Gbodossou, A., & Nadeau, S. (2012). Occupational health and safety risks: Towards the integration into project management. Safety Science, 50(2), 190-198. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.008Carlson, R., Erixon, M., Forsberg, P., & PΓ₯lsson, A.-C. (2001). System for integrated business environmental information management. Advances in Environmental Research, 5(4), 369-375. doi:10.1016/s1093-0191(01)00088-0Florio, C., & Leoni, G. (2017). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case. The British Accounting Review, 49(1), 56-74. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.003Aven, T., & YlΓΆnen, M. (2018). A risk interpretation of sociotechnical safety perspectives. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 175, 13-18. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.004Skorupinska, A., & Torrent-Sellens, J. (2017). ICT, Innovation and Productivity: Evidence Based on Eastern European Manufacturing Companies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(2), 768-788. doi:10.1007/s13132-016-0441-1BenitezβAmado, J., LlorensβMontes, F. J., & Nieves PerezβArostegui, M. (2010). Information technologyβenabled intrapreneurship culture and firm performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(4), 550-566. doi:10.1108/02635571011039025GonzΓ‘lez-Posada, D. M., & Reyes-Bedoya, N. (2019). Herramientas de gestiΓ³n al alcance: caso red de hostales de la ciudad de MedellΓn. Revista CEA, 5(9), 113-129. doi:10.22430/24223182.1261Hernandis OrtuΓ±o, B., & Briede Westermeyer, J. C. (2009). AN EDUCATIONAL APPLICATION FOR A PRODUCT DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS USING INTEGRATED CONCEPTUAL MODELS. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingenierΓa, 17(3). doi:10.4067/s0718-3305200900030001
Towards Automating the Construction & Maintenance of Attack Trees: a Feasibility Study
Security risk management can be applied on well-defined or existing systems;
in this case, the objective is to identify existing vulnerabilities, assess the
risks and provide for the adequate countermeasures. Security risk management
can also be applied very early in the system's development life-cycle, when its
architecture is still poorly defined; in this case, the objective is to
positively influence the design work so as to produce a secure architecture
from the start. The latter work is made difficult by the uncertainties on the
architecture and the multiple round-trips required to keep the risk assessment
study and the system architecture aligned. This is particularly true for very
large projects running over many years. This paper addresses the issues raised
by those risk assessment studies performed early in the system's development
life-cycle. Based on industrial experience, it asserts that attack trees can
help solve the human cognitive scalability issue related to securing those
large, continuously-changing system-designs. However, big attack trees are
difficult to build, and even more difficult to maintain. This paper therefore
proposes a systematic approach to automate the construction and maintenance of
such big attack trees, based on the system's operational and logical
architectures, the system's traditional risk assessment study and a security
knowledge database.Comment: In Proceedings GraMSec 2014, arXiv:1404.163
Integrisan model za upravljanje rizikom u standardizovanim menadΕΎment sistemima
Nowadays organizations seek to use various management system standards (MSSs) in order to organize their management systems and improve the performance of their operations in the right way and then provide the necessary support to manage and address the risks associated with providing these products and services to clients and other stakeholders in addition to providing confidence and security to stakeholders. In this regard, as the first step, a research study has been carried out to analyze the number of companies that have standardized management systems (SMS) obtained for the standards ISO 9001, ISO14001, ISO 50001, ISO 27001, ISO 22000, ISO 13485, ISO 22301, ISO 20000-1, ISO 28000 and ISO 39001 across the continents in 2014, as a result of the increasing growth rate in the management system standards. Later in 2019, the research was conducted to analyze the growth rate of the certificates issued for the standards in addition to five other new standards that were added to the previous ones across the same continents. Based on those longitudinal analyses, according to obtained regression models, predictions were given and standards with the strongest growth trends were identified.
However, till now has not been found a framework to define a common and unified standard model for integrated management systems that can be used in all contingency factors settings. Since, as the main objective of applying the standards of management systems in the organizations is to identify the risks that affect the organization's ability to achieve its goals and desired results in addition to organizing and coordinating all operations and the optimal use of resources, the purpose of this dissertation was to develop an integrated risk management model for standardized management systems with predicted growing trends: ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015, ISO/IEC 27001:2013, ISO 45001:2018 and ISO 22000:2018 in order to enable organizations to manage their processes and associated risks in manner to decrease the number of resources employed and to enhance the organization performance.
Novel risk management integrated model in standardized management systems has three levels β correspondence, coordination and integration and put in place an explicit and systematic approach to managing all risks in the organization. Forms of certain documented information also encompass proposed model. Model has been checked empirically to analyze how organizations in Serbia integrate their MSs and their audits, as well as how they feel and act on risk management issues, all together with difficulties and time needed to integrate MSs, extent of integration of MSs in organizations overall, extent of integrated MS processes, resources and goals, extent of integration of the elements of audit systems and benefits of having integrated audits in organizations together with novel risk model check. Regarding integration, results similar to previous studies have been obtained. Contextual independence of proposed model has been checked using Mann-Whitney U*test and it has been proved that model is context free and applicable to companies different in size and sector. Also, performance indicators have been analyzed and 72% of positive and only 4.5% of negative attitudes have been reached. Accordingly, posted hypothesis have been proved and novel model enables companies to reach the defined goals of the company, as it is experimentally verified.ΠΠ°Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠ΄Π° ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ Π±ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π΅ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π»Π΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π°Π½ ΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠ½, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ Π΄Π° Π±ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π·Π±Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΊΡ Π·Π° ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΡΠΆΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³Π° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌ Π·Π°ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°ΠΌΠ°, ΡΠ· ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠ²ΠΈΡ
Π·Π°ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°. Π‘ΡΠΎΠ³Π° ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π°ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅, ΠΊΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° Π±ΡΠΎΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ° (Π‘ΠΠ‘) Π·Π° ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠ΄Π΅ ΠΠ‘Π 9001, ΠΠ‘Π14001, ΠΠ‘Π 50001, ΠΠ‘Π 27001, ΠΠ‘Π 22000, ΠΠ‘Π 13485, ΠΠ‘Π 22301, ΠΠ‘Π 20000-1, ΠΠ‘Π 28000 ΠΈ ΠΠ‘Π 39001 ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ° Π½Π°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ Ρ 2014. Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ, Π° Π·Π°ΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΈ Ρ 2018. Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ. Π£ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΡ Π»ΠΎΠ½Π³ΠΈΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠ΄ΠΈ ΡΠ° Π½Π°ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°.
ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎ Π΄ΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π°Ρ Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ² ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΈ Π½Π΅Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°, ΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠ»Π° ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π΄Π° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π·Π° ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΡΠ° Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° Π±ΡΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°: ΠΠ‘Π 9001: 2015, ΠΠ‘Π 14001: 2015, ΠΠ‘Π / ΠΠΠ¦ 27001: 2013, ΠΠ‘Π 45001: 2018, ΠΈ ΠΠ‘Π 22000: 2018 ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ Π±ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Π»Π΅ Π΄Π° ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠ° Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈ ΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠΎΡ Π°Π½Π³Π°ΠΆΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅.
ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΡΡΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ° β Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡ, ΠΊΠΎΠΎΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΡΠΆΠ° Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½, ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΏ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠ° Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΠΌΠ°. ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΏΡΡΠ΅Π½ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° ΠΎΠ΄ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅, ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ Ρ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠ° Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡΠ°, ΡΠ° ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅, ΡΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈ Π°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ΅, ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ° Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° ΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅. ΠΠΎ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ°, Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΄Π°ΡΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠ°. ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°Π»Π½Π° Π½Π΅Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌ Mann-Whitney U* ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°. ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ² Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° Π½Π°Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄ Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΡΡ 72% ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅Π³Π° 4,5% Π½Π΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²Π°. ΠΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ, ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ Ρ
ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π΅ ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π» ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠ·Π΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π²Π°, ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎΡ Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ
A Systems Approach to Information Security for the Twenty-First Century Organization
A crisis resulting from disruptive events that threaten to harm the organization or its stakeholders can originate from a plethora of sources. Data breaches, unauthorized disclosures of confidential information, and data leaks, are on the news almost daily. Most guidelines and standards published by prominent International Standards Organizations hold that risk-based thinking supports public, private, and community enterprises (referred for convenience in this work by the generic term βorganizationβ) in determining the forces that could cause their key and enabling processes to deviate from planned arrangements, to apply preventive measures to modify risk, and to take advantage of opportunities as they arise. A well-structured Information Security Management System that is developed, implemented, and maintained through sound risk-based thinking, enables the organization to take appropriate actions to address the risks and opportunities associated with its information resources, in a manner that is commensurate to the complexity of its socio-technical infrastructure and the external environmentassociated with its activities. In this work we explore the Risk Management Process that is outlined in the ISO 31000 international standard, through the requirements/guidelines defined in the ISO/IEC 27000-series of international standards. The knowledge gained is applied to develop a systems driven conceptual structure thatcan be employed by any organization operating on the complexities of an interconnected environment, for the purpose of designing, implementing, monitoring, reviewing and continually improving a structured Information Security Management System
A national cybersecurity management framework for developing countries
Abstract : Please refer to full text to view abstract.D.Phil. (Computer Science
Readiness of local authorities in implementing information security management system (ISMS)
Information Security Management System (ISMS) is an ICT Compliance Standards to provide specifications and controls for protecting information security assets and to increase the integrity and confidence of clients against the agencies, especially those involving the government delivery service. This certification is certified by a certification body of the Standards Industrial Research Institute of Malaysia (SIRIM) and a survey covering the problems faced by Local Authorities in ensuring the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information from any threat and risks that can cripple the agency services. The research process include factors such as threats and vulnerabilities, particularly in security management practices of the agency, which can cause loss of agencies' information and negative impact on the services provided by the Local Authority. Then with studying these factors it can measure the readiness of local authorities in implementing Information Security Management System (ISMS). The process of research studies using quantitative methods in gathering information to analyze the problems faced by the agency to ensure information security is protected such as assessment taxes is the largest contributor earning council. The final result of this research concluded that local authorities are still not ready in implementing Information Security Management System (ISMS)
- β¦