56,400 research outputs found
Perfect zero knowledge for quantum multiprover interactive proofs
In this work we consider the interplay between multiprover interactive
proofs, quantum entanglement, and zero knowledge proofs - notions that are
central pillars of complexity theory, quantum information and cryptography. In
particular, we study the relationship between the complexity class MIP, the
set of languages decidable by multiprover interactive proofs with quantumly
entangled provers, and the class PZKMIP, which is the set of languages
decidable by MIP protocols that furthermore possess the perfect zero
knowledge property.
Our main result is that the two classes are equal, i.e., MIP
PZKMIP. This result provides a quantum analogue of the celebrated result of
Ben-Or, Goldwasser, Kilian, and Wigderson (STOC 1988) who show that MIP
PZKMIP (in other words, all classical multiprover interactive protocols can be
made zero knowledge). We prove our result by showing that every MIP
protocol can be efficiently transformed into an equivalent zero knowledge
MIP protocol in a manner that preserves the completeness-soundness gap.
Combining our transformation with previous results by Slofstra (Forum of
Mathematics, Pi 2019) and Fitzsimons, Ji, Vidick and Yuen (STOC 2019), we
obtain the corollary that all co-recursively enumerable languages (which
include undecidable problems as well as all decidable problems) have zero
knowledge MIP protocols with vanishing promise gap
Quantum Proofs
Quantum information and computation provide a fascinating twist on the notion
of proofs in computational complexity theory. For instance, one may consider a
quantum computational analogue of the complexity class \class{NP}, known as
QMA, in which a quantum state plays the role of a proof (also called a
certificate or witness), and is checked by a polynomial-time quantum
computation. For some problems, the fact that a quantum proof state could be a
superposition over exponentially many classical states appears to offer
computational advantages over classical proof strings. In the interactive proof
system setting, one may consider a verifier and one or more provers that
exchange and process quantum information rather than classical information
during an interaction for a given input string, giving rise to quantum
complexity classes such as QIP, QSZK, and QMIP* that represent natural quantum
analogues of IP, SZK, and MIP. While quantum interactive proof systems inherit
some properties from their classical counterparts, they also possess distinct
and uniquely quantum features that lead to an interesting landscape of
complexity classes based on variants of this model.
In this survey we provide an overview of many of the known results concerning
quantum proofs, computational models based on this concept, and properties of
the complexity classes they define. In particular, we discuss non-interactive
proofs and the complexity class QMA, single-prover quantum interactive proof
systems and the complexity class QIP, statistical zero-knowledge quantum
interactive proof systems and the complexity class \class{QSZK}, and
multiprover interactive proof systems and the complexity classes QMIP, QMIP*,
and MIP*.Comment: Survey published by NOW publisher
A Vision of Collaborative Verification-Driven Engineering of Hybrid Systems
Abstract. Hybrid systems with both discrete and continuous dynamics are an important model for real-world physical systems. The key challenge is how to ensure their correct functioning w.r.t. safety requirements. Promising techniques to ensure safety seem to be model-driven engineering to develop hybrid systems in a well-defined and traceable manner, and formal verification to prove their correctness. Their combination forms the vision of verification-driven engineering. Despite the remarkable progress in automating formal verification of hybrid systems, the construction of proofs of complex systems often requires significant human guidance, since hybrid systems verification tools solve undecidable problems. It is thus not uncommon for verification teams to consist of many players with diverse expertise. This paper introduces a verification-driven engineering toolset that extends our previous work on hybrid and arithmetic verification with tools for (i) modeling hybrid systems, (ii) exchanging and comparing models and proofs, and (iii) managing verification tasks. This toolset makes it easier to tackle large-scale verification tasks.
Collaborative Verification-Driven Engineering of Hybrid Systems
Hybrid systems with both discrete and continuous dynamics are an important
model for real-world cyber-physical systems. The key challenge is to ensure
their correct functioning w.r.t. safety requirements. Promising techniques to
ensure safety seem to be model-driven engineering to develop hybrid systems in
a well-defined and traceable manner, and formal verification to prove their
correctness. Their combination forms the vision of verification-driven
engineering. Often, hybrid systems are rather complex in that they require
expertise from many domains (e.g., robotics, control systems, computer science,
software engineering, and mechanical engineering). Moreover, despite the
remarkable progress in automating formal verification of hybrid systems, the
construction of proofs of complex systems often requires nontrivial human
guidance, since hybrid systems verification tools solve undecidable problems.
It is, thus, not uncommon for development and verification teams to consist of
many players with diverse expertise. This paper introduces a
verification-driven engineering toolset that extends our previous work on
hybrid and arithmetic verification with tools for (i) graphical (UML) and
textual modeling of hybrid systems, (ii) exchanging and comparing models and
proofs, and (iii) managing verification tasks. This toolset makes it easier to
tackle large-scale verification tasks
Physical Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Akari, Takuzu, Kakuro and KenKen
Akari, Takuzu, Kakuro and KenKen are logic games similar to Sudoku. In Akari,
a labyrinth on a grid has to be lit by placing lanterns, respecting various
constraints. In Takuzu a grid has to be filled with 0's and 1's, while
respecting certain constraints. In Kakuro a grid has to be filled with numbers
such that the sums per row and column match given values; similarly in KenKen a
grid has to be filled with numbers such that in given areas the product, sum,
difference or quotient equals a given value. We give physical algorithms to
realize zero-knowledge proofs for these games which allow a player to show that
he knows a solution without revealing it. These interactive proofs can be
realized with simple office material as they only rely on cards and envelopes.
Moreover, we formalize our algorithms and prove their security.Comment: FUN with algorithms 2016, Jun 2016, La Maddalena, Ital
How Were the Hilbert--Einstein Equations Discovered?
The pathways along which A. Einstein and D. Hilbert independently came to the
gravitational field equations are traced. Some of the papers that assert a
point of view on the history of the derivation of the gravitational field
equations ``that radically differs from the standard point of view'' are
critically analyzed. It is shown that the conclusions drawn in these papers are
completely groundless.Comment: 40 pages, misprints remove
Marriages of Mathematics and Physics: A Challenge for Biology
The human attempts to access, measure and organize physical phenomena have led to a manifold construction of mathematical and physical spaces. We will survey the evolution of geometries from Euclid to the Algebraic Geometry of the 20th century. The role of Persian/Arabic Algebra in this transition and its Western symbolic development is emphasized. In this relation, we will also discuss changes in the ontological attitudes toward mathematics and its applications. Historically, the encounter of geometric and algebraic perspectives enriched the mathematical practices and their foundations. Yet, the collapse of Euclidean certitudes, of over 2300 years, and the crisis in the mathematical analysis of the 19th century, led to the exclusion of âgeometric judgmentsâ from the foundations of Mathematics. After the success and the limits of the logico-formal analysis, it is necessary to broaden our foundational tools and re-examine the interactions with natural sciences. In particular, the way the geometric and algebraic approaches organize knowledge is analyzed as a cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural issue and will be examined in Mathematical Physics and Biology. We finally discuss how the current notions of mathematical (phase) âspaceâ should be revisited for the purposes of life sciences
Quantum interactive proofs and the complexity of separability testing
We identify a formal connection between physical problems related to the
detection of separable (unentangled) quantum states and complexity classes in
theoretical computer science. In particular, we show that to nearly every
quantum interactive proof complexity class (including BQP, QMA, QMA(2), and
QSZK), there corresponds a natural separability testing problem that is
complete for that class. Of particular interest is the fact that the problem of
determining whether an isometry can be made to produce a separable state is
either QMA-complete or QMA(2)-complete, depending upon whether the distance
between quantum states is measured by the one-way LOCC norm or the trace norm.
We obtain strong hardness results by proving that for each n-qubit maximally
entangled state there exists a fixed one-way LOCC measurement that
distinguishes it from any separable state with error probability that decays
exponentially in n.Comment: v2: 43 pages, 5 figures, completely rewritten and in Theory of
Computing (ToC) journal forma
- âŠ