188 research outputs found
Principles of Physical Layer Security in Multiuser Wireless Networks: A Survey
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the domain of physical layer
security in multiuser wireless networks. The essential premise of
physical-layer security is to enable the exchange of confidential messages over
a wireless medium in the presence of unauthorized eavesdroppers without relying
on higher-layer encryption. This can be achieved primarily in two ways: without
the need for a secret key by intelligently designing transmit coding
strategies, or by exploiting the wireless communication medium to develop
secret keys over public channels. The survey begins with an overview of the
foundations dating back to the pioneering work of Shannon and Wyner on
information-theoretic security. We then describe the evolution of secure
transmission strategies from point-to-point channels to multiple-antenna
systems, followed by generalizations to multiuser broadcast, multiple-access,
interference, and relay networks. Secret-key generation and establishment
protocols based on physical layer mechanisms are subsequently covered.
Approaches for secrecy based on channel coding design are then examined, along
with a description of inter-disciplinary approaches based on game theory and
stochastic geometry. The associated problem of physical-layer message
authentication is also introduced briefly. The survey concludes with
observations on potential research directions in this area.Comment: 23 pages, 10 figures, 303 refs. arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:1303.1609 by other authors. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials,
201
On the Interference Alignment Designs for Secure Multiuser MIMO Systems
In this paper, we propose two secure multiuser multiple-input multiple-output
transmission approaches based on interference alignment (IA) in the presence of
an eavesdropper. To deal with the information leakage to the eavesdropper as
well as the interference signals from undesired transmitters (Txs) at desired
receivers (Rxs), our approaches aim to design the transmit precoding and
receive subspace matrices to minimize both the total inter-main-link
interference and the wiretapped signals (WSs). The first proposed IA scheme
focuses on aligning the WSs into proper subspaces while the second one imposes
a new structure on the precoding matrices to force the WSs to zero. When the
channel state information is perfectly known at all Txs, in each proposed IA
scheme, the precoding matrices at Txs and the receive subspaces at Rxs or the
eavesdropper are alternatively selected to minimize the cost function of an
convex optimization problem for every iteration. We provide the feasible
conditions and the proofs of convergence for both IA approaches. The simulation
results indicate that our two IA approaches outperform the conventional IA
algorithm in terms of average secrecy sum rate.Comment: Updated version, updated author list, accepted to be appear in IEICE
Transaction
Secure Degrees of Freedom of MIMO X-Channels with Output Feedback and Delayed CSIT
We investigate the problem of secure transmission over a two-user multi-input
multi-output (MIMO) X-channel in which channel state information is provided
with one-unit delay to both transmitters (CSIT), and each receiver feeds back
its channel output to a different transmitter. We refer to this model as MIMO
X-channel with asymmetric output feedback and delayed CSIT. The transmitters
are equipped with M-antennas each, and the receivers are equipped with
N-antennas each. For this model, accounting for both messages at each receiver,
we characterize the optimal sum secure degrees of freedom (SDoF) region. We
show that, in presence of asymmetric output feedback and delayed CSIT, the sum
SDoF region of the MIMO X-channel is same as the SDoF region of a two-user MIMO
BC with 2M-antennas at the transmitter, N-antennas at each receiver and delayed
CSIT. This result shows that, upon availability of asymmetric output feedback
and delayed CSIT, there is no performance loss in terms of sum SDoF due to the
distributed nature of the transmitters. Next, we show that this result also
holds if only output feedback is conveyed to the transmitters, but in a
symmetric manner, i.e., each receiver feeds back its output to both
transmitters and no CSIT. We also study the case in which only asymmetric
output feedback is provided to the transmitters, i.e., without CSIT, and derive
a lower bound on the sum SDoF for this model. Furthermore, we specialize our
results to the case in which there are no security constraints. In particular,
similar to the setting with security constraints, we show that the optimal sum
DoF region of the (M,M,N,N)--MIMO X-channel with asymmetric output feedback and
delayed CSIT is same as the DoF region of a two-user MIMO BC with 2M-antennas
at the transmitter, N-antennas at each receiver, and delayed CSIT. We
illustrate our results with some numerical examples.Comment: To Appear in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Securit
Multiuser Diversity for Secrecy Communications Using Opportunistic Jammer Selection -- Secure DoF and Jammer Scaling Law
In this paper, we propose opportunistic jammer selection in a wireless
security system for increasing the secure degrees of freedom (DoF) between a
transmitter and a legitimate receiver (say, Alice and Bob). There is a jammer
group consisting of jammers among which Bob selects jammers. The
selected jammers transmit independent and identically distributed Gaussian
signals to hinder the eavesdropper (Eve). Since the channels of Bob and Eve are
independent, we can select the jammers whose jamming channels are aligned at
Bob, but not at Eve. As a result, Eve cannot obtain any DoF unless it has more
than receive antennas, where is the number of jammer's transmit
antenna each, and hence can be regarded as defensible dimensions against
Eve. For the jamming signal alignment at Bob, we propose two opportunistic
jammer selection schemes and find the scaling law of the required number of
jammers for target secure DoF by a geometrical interpretation of the received
signals.Comment: Accepted with minor revisions, IEEE Trans. on Signal Processin
- …