4,352 research outputs found
Using Linguistic Features to Estimate Suicide Probability of Chinese Microblog Users
If people with high risk of suicide can be identified through social media
like microblog, it is possible to implement an active intervention system to
save their lives. Based on this motivation, the current study administered the
Suicide Probability Scale(SPS) to 1041 weibo users at Sina Weibo, which is a
leading microblog service provider in China. Two NLP (Natural Language
Processing) methods, the Chinese edition of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count
(LIWC) lexicon and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), are used to extract
linguistic features from the Sina Weibo data. We trained predicting models by
machine learning algorithm based on these two types of features, to estimate
suicide probability based on linguistic features. The experiment results
indicate that LDA can find topics that relate to suicide probability, and
improve the performance of prediction. Our study adds value in prediction of
suicidal probability of social network users with their behaviors
Towards Measuring Adversarial Twitter Interactions against Candidates in the US Midterm Elections
Adversarial interactions against politicians on social media such as Twitter
have significant impact on society. In particular they disrupt substantive
political discussions online, and may discourage people from seeking public
office. In this study, we measure the adversarial interactions against
candidates for the US House of Representatives during the run-up to the 2018 US
general election. We gather a new dataset consisting of 1.7 million tweets
involving candidates, one of the largest corpora focusing on political
discourse. We then develop a new technique for detecting tweets with toxic
content that are directed at any specific candidate.Such technique allows us to
more accurately quantify adversarial interactions towards political candidates.
Further, we introduce an algorithm to induce candidate-specific adversarial
terms to capture more nuanced adversarial interactions that previous techniques
may not consider toxic. Finally, we use these techniques to outline the breadth
of adversarial interactions seen in the election, including offensive
name-calling, threats of violence, posting discrediting information, attacks on
identity, and adversarial message repetition
Effectiveness of dismantling strategies on moderated vs. unmoderated online social platforms
Online social networks are the perfect test bed to better understand
large-scale human behavior in interacting contexts. Although they are broadly
used and studied, little is known about how their terms of service and posting
rules affect the way users interact and information spreads. Acknowledging the
relation between network connectivity and functionality, we compare the
robustness of two different online social platforms, Twitter and Gab, with
respect to dismantling strategies based on the recursive censor of users
characterized by social prominence (degree) or intensity of inflammatory
content (sentiment). We find that the moderated (Twitter) vs unmoderated (Gab)
character of the network is not a discriminating factor for intervention
effectiveness. We find, however, that more complex strategies based upon the
combination of topological and content features may be effective for network
dismantling. Our results provide useful indications to design better strategies
for countervailing the production and dissemination of anti-social content in
online social platforms
Seminar Users in the Arabic Twitter Sphere
We introduce the notion of "seminar users", who are social media users
engaged in propaganda in support of a political entity. We develop a framework
that can identify such users with 84.4% precision and 76.1% recall. While our
dataset is from the Arab region, omitting language-specific features has only a
minor impact on classification performance, and thus, our approach could work
for detecting seminar users in other parts of the world and in other languages.
We further explored a controversial political topic to observe the prevalence
and potential potency of such users. In our case study, we found that 25% of
the users engaged in the topic are in fact seminar users and their tweets make
nearly a third of the on-topic tweets. Moreover, they are often successful in
affecting mainstream discourse with coordinated hashtag campaigns.Comment: to appear in SocInfo 201
- …