14,515 research outputs found
Personal data protection
ZaÅĄtita osobnih podataka u Republici Hrvatskoj ustavna je kategorija zajamÄena
svakoj fiziÄkoj osobi bez obzira na drÅūavljanstvo i prebivaliÅĄte te neovisno o rasi, boji koÅūe,
spolu, jeziku, vjeri, politiÄkom ili drugom uvjerenju, nacionalnom ili socijalnom podrijetlu,
imovini, roÄenju, naobrazbi, druÅĄtvenom poloÅūaju ili drugim osobinama. Ista se u Republici
Hrvatskoj ureÄuje Zakonom o zaÅĄtiti osobnih podataka sa svrhom zaÅĄtite privatnog Åūivota i
ostalih ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda u prikupljanju, obradi i koriÅĄtenju osobnih podataka.
Zakon o zaÅĄtiti osobnih podataka veÅūe se na pravne tekovine Ujedinjenih naroda te Europsku
konvenciju za zaÅĄtitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda. Na temelju navedenog zakona u
Republici Hrvatskoj osnovana je Agencija za zaÅĄtitu osobnih podataka koja se, oslanjajuÄi se
na Direktivu 95/46 Europskog parlamenta, brine za nadzor nad obradom osobnih podataka
kao samostalno i neovisno tijelo. Ovaj rad donosi pregled temeljnih pojmova vezanih uz
zaÅĄtitu osobnih podataka prvenstveno vezanih uz identitet osobe te pregled organizacije
zaÅĄtite osobnih podataka u Republici Hrvatskoj sa usporedbom u odnosu na meÄunarodno
zakonodavstvo te primjerom iz sudske prakse.Protection of personal data in the Republic of Croatia is guaranteed as a constitutional
category to every person regardless of nationality and place of residence and regardless of
race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth, education, social status or other characteristics. In the Republic of Croatia
protection of personal data is regulated by the Law on Protection of Personal Data in order to
protect privacy and other human rights and fundamental freedoms during collection,
processing and use of personal data. The Law on Protection of Personal Data binds on the
legal heritage of the United Nations and the European Convention for the Protection of
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Based on this law, an Agency for protection of
personal data was established which controls the processing of personal data (relying on
Directive 95/46 of the European Parliament) as an autonomous and independent body. This
paper presents an overview of basic concepts related to the protection of personal data
primarily related to the identity of the person and the organization of the protection of
personal data in the Republic of Croatia, with a comparison in relation to international
legislation and case law
āļāļēāļĢāļāļļāđāļĄāļāļĢāļāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļāļĩāļ§āļĄāļēāļāļĢāļ āļēāļĒāđāļāđāļāļĢāļ°āļĢāļēāļāļāļąāļāļāļąāļāļīāļāļļāđāļĄāļāļĢāļāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļļāļāļāļĨ āļ.āļĻ. 2562 Biometric Personal Data Protection under Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2560
āļāļāļāļąāļāļĒāđāļāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļąāļāļāļļāļāļąāļāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ°āđāļĄāļīāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļļāļāļāļĨāļāļĩāđāļāđāļāđāļŦāđāđāļāļīāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļŠāļĩāļĒāļŦāļēāļĒāļāđāļāđāļāđāļēāļāļāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļļāļāļāļĨ āđāļāļĒāđāļāļāļēāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāđāļāđāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļāļĩāļ§āļĄāļēāļāļĢ āļāļķāđāļāļĄāļĩāļāļĨāļĄāļēāļāļēāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāđāļēāļ§āļŦāļāđāļēāļāļēāļāđāļāļāđāļāđāļĨāļĒāļĩāļāļĩāđāđāļāđāļāļĢāļ§āļāļĢāļ§āļĄāđāļāđ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļāđāļāļīāļāđāļāļĒāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļļāļāļāļĨ āļāļēāļĢāđāļāđāļēāļāļķāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļļāļāļāļĨāļāļģāđāļāđāđāļāļĒāļāđāļēāļĒ āļŠāļ°āļāļ§āļ āđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļ§āļāđāļĢāđāļ§ āļāļąāļāļĄāļĩāļāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāđāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĄāļąāđāļāļāļ āđāļĨāļ°āđāļĻāļĢāļĐāļāļāļīāļāđāļāļĒāļĢāļ§āļĄ āļāļĢāļ°āđāļāļĻāđāļāļĒāļāļķāļāđāļāđāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļĻāđāļāđāļāļĢāļ°āļĢāļēāļāļāļąāļāļāļąāļāļīāļāļļāđāļĄāļāļĢāļāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļļāļāļāļĨ āļ.āļĻ. 2560 āļāļķāđāļ āđāļāļ·āđāļāļāļģāļŦāļāļāļŦāļĨāļąāļāđāļāļāļāđ āļāļĨāđāļ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļĄāļēāļāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļāļģāļāļąāļāļāļđāđāļĨāđāļāļĩāđāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļŦāđāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļļāđāļĄāļāļĢāļāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļļāļāļāļĨāļāļĒāđāļēāļāđāļĢāļāđāļāļēāļĄ āļāļāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļāļąāļāļāļĩāđāļĒāļąāļāļĄāļĩāļāļĢāļ°āđāļāđāļāļāļĩāđāļāđāļēāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ§āļīāđāļāļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđāđāļāļīāđāļĄāđāļāļīāļĄāđāļāđāļĢāļ·āđāļāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāđāļāļĢāļ§āļĄ āļĢāļ§āļĄāđāļāđ āļāļĢāļ°āļĄāļ§āļĨāļāļĨ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļŠāđāļāļŦāļĢāļ·āļāđāļāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāđāļāļĒāļąāļāļāđāļēāļāļāļĢāļ°āđāļāļĻ āđāļāļĒāđāļāđāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļļāđāļĄāļāļĢāļāļāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļļāļāļāļĨāļāļāļāļāđāļēāļāļāļĢāļ°āđāļāļĻ āđāļāđāđāļāđ āļŠāļŦāļ āļēāļāļĒāļļāđāļĢāļ āļāļĢāļ°āđāļāļĻāļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļāđāļĄāļĢāļīāļāļē āļāļĢāļ°āđāļāļĻāđāļāļāļēāļāļē āđāļĨāļ°āļāļĢāļ°āđāļāļĻāļŠāļŦāļāļąāļāļāļĢāļąāļāđāļĒāļāļĢāļĄāļąāļ āđāļāļ·āđāļāļāļģāļĄāļēāļāļĢāļąāļāļāļĢāļļāļ āđāļāđāđāļ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļāđāļāļīāđāļĄāđāļāļīāļĄāļāļāļāļąāļāļāļąāļāļīāļāļāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļāļāļāļĢāļ°āđāļāļĻāđāļāļĒāļāļąāļāđāļāđāļāļāļĢāļ°āđāļĒāļāļāđāļāđāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļļāđāļĄāļāļĢāļāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļļāļāļāļĨāđāļāđāļāļĒāđāļēāļāļĄāļĩāļāļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļāļāļīāļ āļēāļāļĄāļēāļāļĒāļīāđāļāļāļķāđāļ
AbstractNowadays, the violation of personal information causes damage to the information owners, especially the biometric data, because the advance technologymade the acquire access and disclose of personal data easily. Due to mentional problem may affect Thailandâs national security and economy; therefore, the Government promulgated the Personal Data Protection Act 2017 to specify criteria, mechanisms, or regulatory measures regarding the protection of personal data. However, this Act still has some issues that should study further regarding the collection, usage, processing transmission, and or transferring of information to other countries. This study employed a comparative study of personal data protection laws of foreign countries such as the European Union, the United States of America, Canada, and Germany should in order to improve or amend the Thai law to become more efficient in the protection of personal data
Personal data protection for sole traders
In the context of an open definition of personal data and accepting a broad
understanding of the subject range of the PDPA44, information about natural persons
who conduct business activity should be treated as personal data, as it is frequently
information allowing a specific natural person to be identified. On the other hand,
publishing personal data of people with business activity in CEIDG forces the conclusion
that the sole trader decides to makes the data broadly accessible, and therefore is aware
that its protection is limited. It should not mean that commonly accessible data can
be processed absolutely freely with complete disregard for PDPA, as business entities
also have a right to privacy. However, from a practical point of view, in their case this
right is limited by the rule of the publicness of economic turnover. It can be noticed
that the practice of economic turnover forces a more flexible approach to the presented
issue45. In this respect, since May 2016, the Act has introduced new provisions that are
intended to ensure a realistic balance between the business entityâs and public interest.
The purpose of the amendment of the Act on Freedom of Business Activity, adopted
in September 2015, is primarily to accelerate the service of undertakings. Undoubtedly,
in the content of the business entityâs data the revision of the Act introduced provisions
broadening the scope of data contained in the CEIDG entry. The main changes that
came into force can certainly stir up controversies. It is difficult to explicitly declare
whether those legal solutions are effective and positive. Certainly, introducing regulations
excluding the PDPA regarding the personal data of a sole trader, assuming the public
nature of the overwhelming majority of their data, results in a situation in which they
are not properly protected
IoT Platform for Personal Data Protection
Since the establishment of IoT (Internet of Things), a variety of end devices become interconnected with one another, and thus, new types of security challenges appeared which have to be taken care of. Personal data, at the moment, have a higher risk of being hacked by various types of cyberattacks, as a result of the abundance of connectivity in the cloud realm. To face this type of challenges, the European Union decided to implement in 2018 the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) that implies that personal data of any kind can be shared with a third party only with their accord and can be, as well, deleted by them, whenever they desire. Henceforth, this paper introduces the PARFAIT project that will take into account this regulation and will integrate a platform with the purpose of protecting the personal data in IoT based applications, especially for smart home, smart office and smart hotel use cases.</p
Personal data protection
Trabajo de Fin MÃĄster del TÃtulo Propio de la USAL "MÃĄster en acceso a la abogacÃa". Curso 2015-2017[ES] El presente trabajo tratarÃĄ de forma eminentemente prÃĄctica la protecciÃģn de datos de carÃĄcter personal, que como consecuencia de la reciente Sentencia el TJUE de 6 de Octubre de 2015, se ha visto en la necesidad de buscar alternativas con respecto a la situaciÃģn anterior a la misma.
Siendo esta Sentencia el punto de partida que viene a desvirtuar el concepto de Puerto Seguro o Safe Harbor, dicho de forma sencilla, que la transferencia de datos de carÃĄcter personal con Estados Unidos y su posterior tratamiento no es seguro para el ciudadano europeo, ya que las autoridades estadounidenses tienen acceso casi indiscriminado a los mismos.
Analizando a fondo dicha sentencia y el marco en el cual se trabajaba antes de ella, harÃĐ una comparaciÃģn de cÃģmo ha quedado configurado el nuevo escenario para la protecciÃģn de los datos personales y lo que como profesionales del derecho podemos hacer para proporcionar la debida y exigida seguridad en el trÃĄnsito y tratamiento de los datos, asà como las nuevas posibilidades que van surgiendo para hacer efectiva la protecciÃģn, las cuales cristalizaron en la DecisiÃģn 1250/2016.[EN] This work will deal in an eminently practical way with the protection of personal data, which as a consequence of the recent Judgment of the CJEU of October 6, 2015, has been in need of looking for alternatives with regard to the situation prior to it.
This Judgment is the point of departure that is to detract from the concept of Safe Harbor, simply said that the transfer of personal data with the United States and its subsequent treatment is not safe for the European citizen, since The US authorities have almost indiscriminate access to them.
Analyzing in depth this sentence and the framework in which it was worked before it, I will make a comparison of how the new scenario for the protection of personal data has been configured and what, as legal professionals, we can do to provide the due and required security in transit and data processing, as well as the new possibilities that are emerging to make effective the protection, which crystallized in Decision 1250/2016
Personal Data Protection in EU, Where to?
The protection of individuals regarding the processing of personal data and free movement of such data represents a growing concern of the States, but also of the EU bodies. At the level of EU Member States, the issue of protecting the individuals regarding the processing of personal data and free movement of such data poses no particular problems. Internationally and especially between the member states of the European Union, the existing regulatory framework no longer responds to theses needs such as: online activities, digital economy, internet banking, etc., being increasingly obvious the tendency of fragmentation of the movement of personal data
Formulation of Specific Personal Data Protection in Relation to Court Decisions
This research aims to examine and analyze the actualization of specific personal data protection in the context of court decisions. In the digital era and with the advancement of information technology, the protection of personal data has become an increasingly important and relevant issue. However, there is a need to further understand how specific personal data protection is realized and implemented in the context of court decisions. This research adopts a normative legal research method with a legislative and conceptual approach. The data used consists of primary legal materials such as legislation and court decisions related to personal data protection. Additionally, this study also refers to legal literature and expert opinions regarding personal data protection and court decisions. The results of the research indicate that the actualization of specific personal data protection in court decisions is an exception due to the principle of open court proceedings and the publication of trial outcomes. This relates to the specific personal data protection concerning criminal records. There is a need to exempt criminal records from the exceptions stated in court decisions. The importance of exempting personal data protection in the context of court decisions is also emphasized to prevent misuse in the judicial process and maintain public trust in the justice system. This research provides an important contribution to identify and analyze how specific personal data protection can be implemented in court decisions. The implications of this research are expected to provide a better understanding for relevant parties, including the judiciary, government, and the general public, regarding the importance of specific personal data protection in the context of justice.
Keywords: formulation, personal data protection, court decisio
Personal Data Protection: Insights in the digital context
This position paper presents an overview of key insights pertaining to the protection of personal data in the digital business context, as derived from pertinent academic and practitioner literature. These insights, along with insights from subject matter experts, have informed development of IVIâs IT-CMF Personal Data Protection (PDP) Critical Capability
- âĶ