11,753 research outputs found
SENATUS: An Approach to Joint Traffic Anomaly Detection and Root Cause Analysis
In this paper, we propose a novel approach, called SENATUS, for joint traffic
anomaly detection and root-cause analysis. Inspired from the concept of a
senate, the key idea of the proposed approach is divided into three stages:
election, voting and decision. At the election stage, a small number of
\nop{traffic flow sets (termed as senator flows)}senator flows are chosen\nop{,
which are used} to represent approximately the total (usually huge) set of
traffic flows. In the voting stage, anomaly detection is applied on the senator
flows and the detected anomalies are correlated to identify the most possible
anomalous time bins. Finally in the decision stage, a machine learning
technique is applied to the senator flows of each anomalous time bin to find
the root cause of the anomalies. We evaluate SENATUS using traffic traces
collected from the Pan European network, GEANT, and compare against another
approach which detects anomalies using lossless compression of traffic
histograms. We show the effectiveness of SENATUS in diagnosing anomaly types:
network scans and DoS/DDoS attacks
Towards a Reliable Comparison and Evaluation of Network Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Machine Learning Approaches
Presently, we are living in a hyper-connected world where millions of heterogeneous devices are continuously sharing information in different application contexts for wellness, improving communications, digital businesses, etc. However, the bigger the number of devices and connections are, the higher the risk of security threats in this scenario. To counteract against malicious behaviours and preserve essential security services, Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDSs) are the most widely used defence line in communications networks. Nevertheless, there is no standard methodology to evaluate and fairly compare NIDSs. Most of the proposals elude mentioning crucial steps regarding NIDSs validation that make their comparison hard or even impossible. This work firstly includes a comprehensive study of recent NIDSs based on machine learning approaches, concluding that almost all of them do not accomplish with what authors of this paper consider mandatory steps for a reliable comparison and evaluation of NIDSs. Secondly, a structured methodology is proposed and assessed on the UGR'16 dataset to test its suitability for addressing network attack detection problems. The guideline and steps recommended will definitively help the research community to fairly assess NIDSs, although the definitive framework is not a trivial task and, therefore, some extra effort should still be made to improve its understandability and usability further
Robust Anomaly Detection in Dynamic Networks
We propose two robust methods for anomaly detection in dynamic networks in
which the properties of normal traffic are time-varying. We formulate the
robust anomaly detection problem as a binary composite hypothesis testing
problem and propose two methods: a model-free and a model-based one, leveraging
techniques from the theory of large deviations. Both methods require a family
of Probability Laws (PLs) that represent normal properties of traffic. We
devise a two-step procedure to estimate this family of PLs. We compare the
performance of our robust methods and their vanilla counterparts, which assume
that normal traffic is stationary, on a network with a diurnal normal pattern
and a common anomaly related to data exfiltration. Simulation results show that
our robust methods perform better than their vanilla counterparts in dynamic
networks.Comment: 6 pages. MED conferenc
- …