Performance Comparisons of Greedy Algorithms in Compressed Sensing

Compressed sensing has motivated the development of numerous sparse approximation algorithms designed to return a solution to an underdetermined system of linear equations where the solution has the fewest number of nonzeros possible, referred to as the sparsest solution. In the compressed sensing setting, greedy sparse approximation algorithms have been observed to be both able to recovery the sparsest solution for similar problem sizes as other algorithms and to be computationally efficient; however, little theory is known for their average case behavior. We conduct a large scale empirical investigation into the behavior of three of the state of the art greedy algorithms: NIHT, HTP, and CSMPSP. The investigation considers a variety of random classes of linear systems. The regions of the problem size in which each algorithm is able to reliably recovery the sparsest solution is accurately determined, and throughout this region additional performance characteristics are presented. Contrasting the recovery regions and average computational time for each algorithm we present algorithm selection maps which indicate, for each problem size, which algorithm is able to reliably recovery the sparsest vector in the least amount of time. Though no one algorithm is observed to be uniformly superior, NIHT is observed to have an advantageous balance of large recovery region, absolute recovery time, and robustness of these properties to additive noise and for a variety of problem classes. The algorithm selection maps presented here are the first of their kind for compressed sensing

Expander ℓ0\ell_0-Decoding

We introduce two new algorithms, Serial-$\ell_0$ and Parallel-$\ell_0$ for solving a large underdetermined linear system of equations $y = Ax \in \mathbb{R}^m$ when it is known that $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$ has at most $k < m$ nonzero entries and that $A$ is the adjacency matrix of an unbalanced left $d$-regular expander graph. The matrices in this class are sparse and allow a highly efficient implementation. A number of algorithms have been designed to work exclusively under this setting, composing the branch of combinatorial compressed-sensing (CCS). Serial-$\ell_0$ and Parallel-$\ell_0$ iteratively minimise $\|y - A\hat x\|_0$ by successfully combining two desirable features of previous CCS algorithms: the information-preserving strategy of ER, and the parallel updating mechanism of SMP. We are able to link these elements and guarantee convergence in $\mathcal{O}(dn \log k)$ operations by assuming that the signal is dissociated, meaning that all of the $2^k$ subset sums of the support of $x$ are pairwise different. However, we observe empirically that the signal need not be exactly dissociated in practice. Moreover, we observe Serial-$\ell_0$ and Parallel-$\ell_0$ to be able to solve large scale problems with a larger fraction of nonzeros than other algorithms when the number of measurements is substantially less than the signal length; in particular, they are able to reliably solve for a $k$-sparse vector $x\in\mathbb{R}^n$ from $m$ expander measurements with $n/m=10^3$ and $k/m$ up to four times greater than what is achievable by $\ell_1$-regularization from dense Gaussian measurements. Additionally, Serial-$\ell_0$ and Parallel-$\ell_0$ are observed to be able to solve large problems sizes in substantially less time than other algorithms for compressed sensing. In particular, Parallel-$\ell_0$ is structured to take advantage of massively parallel architectures.Comment: 14 pages, 10 figure

A robust parallel algorithm for combinatorial compressed sensing

In previous work two of the authors have shown that a vector $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$ with at most $k < n$ nonzeros can be recovered from an expander sketch $Ax$ in $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{nnz}(A)\log k)$ operations via the Parallel-$\ell_0$ decoding algorithm, where $\mathrm{nnz}(A)$ denotes the number of nonzero entries in $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$. In this paper we present the Robust-$\ell_0$ decoding algorithm, which robustifies Parallel-$\ell_0$ when the sketch $Ax$ is corrupted by additive noise. This robustness is achieved by approximating the asymptotic posterior distribution of values in the sketch given its corrupted measurements. We provide analytic expressions that approximate these posteriors under the assumptions that the nonzero entries in the signal and the noise are drawn from continuous distributions. Numerical experiments presented show that Robust-$\ell_0$ is superior to existing greedy and combinatorial compressed sensing algorithms in the presence of small to moderate signal-to-noise ratios in the setting of Gaussian signals and Gaussian additive noise

Exploiting Prior Knowledge in Compressed Sensing Wireless ECG Systems

Recent results in telecardiology show that compressed sensing (CS) is a promising tool to lower energy consumption in wireless body area networks for electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. However, the performance of current CS-based algorithms, in terms of compression rate and reconstruction quality of the ECG, still falls short of the performance attained by state-of-the-art wavelet based algorithms. In this paper, we propose to exploit the structure of the wavelet representation of the ECG signal to boost the performance of CS-based methods for compression and reconstruction of ECG signals. More precisely, we incorporate prior information about the wavelet dependencies across scales into the reconstruction algorithms and exploit the high fraction of common support of the wavelet coefficients of consecutive ECG segments. Experimental results utilizing the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database show that significant performance gains, in terms of compression rate and reconstruction quality, can be obtained by the proposed algorithms compared to current CS-based methods.Comment: Accepted for publication at IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatic

Sparse Vector Distributions and Recovery from Compressed Sensing

It is well known that the performance of sparse vector recovery algorithms from compressive measurements can depend on the distribution underlying the non-zero elements of a sparse vector. However, the extent of these effects has yet to be explored, and formally presented. In this paper, I empirically investigate this dependence for seven distributions and fifteen recovery algorithms. The two morals of this work are: 1) any judgement of the recovery performance of one algorithm over that of another must be prefaced by the conditions for which this is observed to be true, including sparse vector distributions, and the criterion for exact recovery; and 2) a recovery algorithm must be selected carefully based on what distribution one expects to underlie the sensed sparse signal.Comment: Originally submitted to IEEE Signal Processing Letters in March 2011, but rejected June 2011. Revised, expanded, and submitted July 2011 to EURASIP Journal special issue on sparse signal processin