18 research outputs found

    Supply chain analysis and upgrading of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to meet Finnish gas market specifications

    Get PDF
    Liquefied natural gas (LNG) presents clean, cost-effective solution for transportation/ shipping of natural gas from remote reservoirs to consumer market. Until recently, the limits of natural gas properties, acceptable to LNG importers, had been lenient, as it was generally used for power production. However, new markets, as they use LNG to supplement their current supplies, demand an LNG with characteristics/ quality compatible to their existing pipeline grid and clientele specifications. This raises natural gas harmonization, interoperability and interchangeability issues in potential LNG importers, such as Finland which is wholly reliant on single natural gas source from Russia. Rising environmental concerns, stiffening emission regulations and energy security drive Finland to import LNG. This thesis is aimed at identifying the world LNG sources suitable for import to Finnish market based on specifications required by natural gas applications in Finland. The thesis also studies the LNG value chain in general and the LNG quality modification at import terminal/ regasification plant. Production, liquefaction, storage, transportation, and regasification are core components of LNG value chain besides numerous minor constituents including LNG liquid fuel engines. Finnish natural gas market is divided into broad segments of traffic, off-grid industry and existing gas grid users. Specification-data of all three designated sectors was collected from the manufacturers and industry. By considering three interchangeability parameters of natural gas: methane number, Wobbe index (lower), and lower heating value, this data was mapped on charts to determine the requirement of each sector and finally the common demand band (common window) of all the sectors. Similarly, the data of 27 available LNG sources and 3 European LNG re-export terminals was gathered and graphically analyzed. A preliminary simulation of 3 alternative processes, by means of Aspen HYSYS software, and their subsequent comparison resulted in selection of LPG Extraction as the most feasible LNG de-richment technique employed at a receiving terminal LNG re-vapourization plant. As per the current Finnish market requirement and grid conditions, out of 27 global LNG sources, the number of feasible sources remains 3; however, it could be increased to 7 by compromising land traffic sector methane number demand, and to 11 if the upper bounds for heating value are relaxed up to +3%. LNG from rest of the producers can be viable with additional processing at the targeted market in Finland

    Modelling the weathering process of stored liquefied natural gas (LNG)

    Get PDF
    Weathering occurs in stored liquefied natural gas (LNG) due to the removal of the boil-off gas (BOG) from the LNG container and results in the remaining LNG being richer in heavier components. A model has been developed to predict stored LNG weathering in containment tanks, typically used in regasification. The model integrates a vapour-liquid equilibrium model, and a realistic heat transfer model. It provides a number of advances on previously developed models: (i) heat ingress is calculated based on outside temperature and LNG composition, allowing for daily/seasonal variations; (ii) boil-off-ratio is not an input; (iii) LNG density is estimated using an experimentally based correlation. The model was validated using real industry data and the agreement obtained in predicting overall composition, density and amount vaporized was within industry requirements. Two modelling approaches have been developed: (i) assuming thermodynamic equilibrium between vapour and liquid; and (ii) assuming heat exchange between the two phases. Both models were run in a predictive mode to assess the BOG under different scenarios. One of the main results of this work is that the BOG generation is 25% less when considering the non-equilibrium approach, which will have a significant impact on industry where simple equilibrium models are used. In the initial stages of weathering nitrogen content of LNG has a marked effect on BOG generation. Even 0.5% mol of nitrogen leads to nearly 7% BOG decrease, making the initial BOG unmarketable. That is a result of preferential evaporation of nitrogen and increase in the direct differential molar latent heat. In the final stages of weathering the heavier hydrocarbons govern the BOG dynamics, which becomes a strong function of initial composition and the LNG remaining in the tank.Open Acces

    Management of Emissions at Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company

    Get PDF
    Gas industries in the United Arab Emirates are vastly growing in order to mainly cope with the increasing demand for energy productions as well as for the wise utilization of gas associate with the crude oil. Environmental problems coupled with gas employment necessitates the development of a management techniques that can lead to better control of emissions from gas processing companies since some of these emissions are unavoidable for safety reasons. This study suggests a framework to be used to control emissions from Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company (ADGAS) in Das Island, which represents a typical major gas processing company in the region, through investigations of the impact of introducing a modification scheme, within the unit processes, on the quality of the surrounding atmosphere. A baseline study for current emissions and ground level concentrations of four pollutants (sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide and particulates) was established. A computer model was then used to simulate the proposed modifications in order to reduce ground level concentrations that exceed regulatory standards. Two main approaches were considered to minimize ground level concentrations. First, reducing flow of gas into the flares by adding compressors to recover any excess gas from going into the flares during operations. Second, upgrading sulphur recovery units to a higher efficiency and some other reduction can also be accomplished through sweetening of fuel gas directed to utilities. The study concluded that the rates of emitted gas at ADGAS Liquefied Natural Gas Plant are exceeding the exposure limits under all emergency and current normal operation conditions. Gas turbines and boilers were proved to be the major sources for nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide, while both sulphur recovery units and gas turbines are contributing to the emission of sulphur dioxide. In the meantime, upgrading of the sulphur recovery units to 97.5% resulted in 30% decrease in sulphur dioxide concentration. A significant decrease in nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide as well as particulate concentrations resulted from adding a third boil-off-gas compressor

    ๋™์  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ LNG-FSRU ํƒ‘์‚ฌ์ด๋“œ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์šด์ „์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™”ํ•™์ƒ๋ฌผ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2015. 2. ํ•œ์ข…ํ›ˆ.์ตœ๊ทผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฒœ์—ฐ๊ฐ€์Šค์˜ ์ˆ˜์š”์— ๋งž์ถฐ ์•กํ™” ์ฒœ์—ฐ๊ฐ€์Šค(LNG) ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์‹œ์„ค์˜ ์ˆ˜์š”๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•„์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํŠนํžˆ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์œก์ƒ ๊ณต๊ธ‰ ์‹œ์„ค๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ณต์‚ฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„, ๋น„์šฉ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•œ ํ•ด์ƒ ๋ถ€์œ ์‹ ์ €์žฅ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํ™” ์„ค๋น„(FSRU)์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์ด ํ™•๋Œ€๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. LNG-FSRU๋Š” ๊ทธ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์œก์ƒ ์ฒœ์—ฐ๊ฐ€์Šค ํ„ฐ๋ฏธ๋„์ด๋‚˜ ์ฒœ์—ฐ๊ฐ€์Šค ์ˆ˜์†ก์„ ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ธฐ์กด ๊ณต์ • ์„ค๊ณ„์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์ง€ ์•Š๋˜ ํ•ด์–‘ ์ƒํ™ฉ์„ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ LNG-FSRU์˜ ๊ณต์ • ๋ฐ ์šด์ „ ์ ˆ์ฐจ์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„์™€ ์•ˆ์ „ํ•œ ์šด์ „์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋™์  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•  ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์™€ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์„ผ์„œ ์„ค์น˜๊ฐ€ ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋™์  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ LNG-FSRU์˜ ํƒ‘์‚ฌ์ด๋“œ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„์™€ ์šด์ „์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ๊ณต์ • ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด LNG-FSRU์˜ ๊ณต์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•ด์–‘ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋˜ํ•œ LNG-FSRU์˜ ๊ณต์ • ๋ฐ ์šด์ „ ์ ˆ์ฐจ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋™์  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ, ๊ทธ ์ค‘์—์„œ๋„ ๊ณต์ •์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ด ๋˜๋Š” ์žฌ์•กํ™”๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒ์„ธ ๋ชจ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•„์šธ๋Ÿฌ LNG-FSRU ๋ฐฐ๊ด€ ๋‚ด์˜ ์ž‘์—…์ž๊ฐ€ ์•Œ๊ณ  ์‹ถ์€ ์–ด๋–ค ์ง€์ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ๊ฐ’์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ž๋™ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์„ธ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ํ•ด์–‘ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ด ๊ณต์ •์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์š”์ธ์„ ์œ ๋™ํ˜„์ƒ์˜ ์žฅ์น˜ ๋‚ด ์œ ์ž…, ํ”Œ๋žœํŠธ ์„ค์น˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ์˜์—ญ ์ œํ•œ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์žฅ์น˜ ๋ฌด๊ฒŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ณ ๋ ค ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ์š”์ธ๋“ค์ด ๊ณต์ • ์„ค๊ณ„์— ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ LNG-FSRU ํƒ‘์‚ฌ์ด๋“œ์˜ ์ตœ์  ๊ณต์ • ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•œ LNG-FSRU์˜ ๊ณต์ •์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋™์  ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ LNG-FSRU ๊ณต์ • ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋ชจ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ๋‚œํ•ดํ•œ ์ฆ๋ฐœ๊ฐ€์Šค ์žฌ์•กํ™”๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒ์„ธ ๋ชจ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์กด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ์žฌ์•กํ™”๊ธฐ์˜ ์šด์ „์„ ๋ชจ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ LNG-FSRU์˜ ๋ฐฐ๊ด€์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์„ผ์„œ๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” ์–ด๋Š ์ง€์ ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋”๋ผ๋„ ํ•ด๋‹น ์ง€์ ์˜ ๊ณต์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ž๋™ํ™”๋œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก์— ๊ฑธ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ธฐ์กด๋ณด๋‹ค 1/10 ์ดํ•˜๋กœ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.Abstract Contents List of Figures List of Tables Chapter 1 : Introduction 1.1. Research motivation 1.2. Research objectives 1.3. Outline of the thesis Chapter 2 : Topside process design of LNG-FSRU 2.1. Introduction 2.2. Theoretical backgrounds 2.2.1. LNG-FSRU 2.2.2. Traditional process design procedures 2.2.3. Process design for offshore plant topside 2.3. Basis of design for LNG-FSRU 2.3.1. Design specification 2.3.2. Target specification 2.4. LNG-FSRU Topside process design 2.4.1. Basic process scheme 2.4.2. Detailed design of topside process 2.4.3. Vaporizator selection 2.4.4. Heat and material balance sheet 2.5. Result and discussion Chapter 3 : Dynamic Simulation of LNG-FSRU topside process 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Theoretical backgrounds 3.2.1. BOG Recondenser 3.2.2. Prior researches about recondenser modeling 3.3. Proposed modeling methodology 3.3.1. General dynamic simulation of a BOG recondenser 3.3.2. Building the flash ratio function 3.4. Case study : Data preprocessing 3.4.1. Noise filtering 3.4.2. Raw data selection 3.5. Case study : Advanced dynamic modeling for BOG recondenser 3.5.1. Model building 3.5.2. Model validation 3.5.3. HYSYS non-equilibrium solving method 3.6. Result and discussion Chapter 4 : Automatic simulation-based soft sensor generation for LNG-FSRU 4.1. Introduction 4.2. LNG terminal 4.3. Methodology 4.3.1. Quantization of target location information 4.3.2. Model boundary selection 4.3.3. Degree of freedom calculation for the LNG pipeline 4.3.4. Simulation of the target model with minimizing error 4.4. Case study 4.4.1. Case study 1 4.4.2. Case study 2 4.5. Result and discussion Chapter 5 : Conclusion and Future Works 5.1. Conclusion 5.2. Future worksDocto
    corecore