71,471 research outputs found
An Empirical Study of the I2P Anonymity Network and its Censorship Resistance
Tor and I2P are well-known anonymity networks used by many individuals to
protect their online privacy and anonymity. Tor's centralized directory
services facilitate the understanding of the Tor network, as well as the
measurement and visualization of its structure through the Tor Metrics project.
In contrast, I2P does not rely on centralized directory servers, and thus
obtaining a complete view of the network is challenging. In this work, we
conduct an empirical study of the I2P network, in which we measure properties
including population, churn rate, router type, and the geographic distribution
of I2P peers. We find that there are currently around 32K active I2P peers in
the network on a daily basis. Of these peers, 14K are located behind NAT or
firewalls.
Using the collected network data, we examine the blocking resistance of I2P
against a censor that wants to prevent access to I2P using address-based
blocking techniques. Despite the decentralized characteristics of I2P, we
discover that a censor can block more than 95% of peer IP addresses known by a
stable I2P client by operating only 10 routers in the network. This amounts to
severe network impairment: a blocking rate of more than 70% is enough to cause
significant latency in web browsing activities, while blocking more than 90% of
peer IP addresses can make the network unusable. Finally, we discuss the
security consequences of the network being blocked, and directions for
potential approaches to make I2P more resistant to blocking.Comment: 14 pages, To appear in the 2018 Internet Measurement Conference
(IMC'18
X-Vine: Secure and Pseudonymous Routing Using Social Networks
Distributed hash tables suffer from several security and privacy
vulnerabilities, including the problem of Sybil attacks. Existing social
network-based solutions to mitigate the Sybil attacks in DHT routing have a
high state requirement and do not provide an adequate level of privacy. For
instance, such techniques require a user to reveal their social network
contacts. We design X-Vine, a protection mechanism for distributed hash tables
that operates entirely by communicating over social network links. As with
traditional peer-to-peer systems, X-Vine provides robustness, scalability, and
a platform for innovation. The use of social network links for communication
helps protect participant privacy and adds a new dimension of trust absent from
previous designs. X-Vine is resilient to denial of service via Sybil attacks,
and in fact is the first Sybil defense that requires only a logarithmic amount
of state per node, making it suitable for large-scale and dynamic settings.
X-Vine also helps protect the privacy of users social network contacts and
keeps their IP addresses hidden from those outside of their social circle,
providing a basis for pseudonymous communication. We first evaluate our design
with analysis and simulations, using several real world large-scale social
networking topologies. We show that the constraints of X-Vine allow the
insertion of only a logarithmic number of Sybil identities per attack edge; we
show this mitigates the impact of malicious attacks while not affecting the
performance of honest nodes. Moreover, our algorithms are efficient, maintain
low stretch, and avoid hot spots in the network. We validate our design with a
PlanetLab implementation and a Facebook plugin.Comment: 15 page
Graffiti Networks: A Subversive, Internet-Scale File Sharing Model
The proliferation of peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing protocols is due to
their efficient and scalable methods for data dissemination to numerous users.
But many of these networks have no provisions to provide users with long term
access to files after the initial interest has diminished, nor are they able to
guarantee protection for users from malicious clients that wish to implicate
them in incriminating activities. As such, users may turn to supplementary
measures for storing and transferring data in P2P systems. We present a new
file sharing paradigm, called a Graffiti Network, which allows peers to harness
the potentially unlimited storage of the Internet as a third-party
intermediary. Our key contributions in this paper are (1) an overview of a
distributed system based on this new threat model and (2) a measurement of its
viability through a one-year deployment study using a popular web-publishing
platform. The results of this experiment motivate a discussion about the
challenges of mitigating this type of file sharing in a hostile network
environment and how web site operators can protect their resources
- …