Norwegian retroflexion : licensing by cue or prosody?

A common topic in recent literature on phonology is the question of whether phonological processes and segments are licensed by prosodic position or by perceptual cues. The former is the traditional view, as represented by e.g. Lombardi (1995) and Beckman (1998), and holds that segments occur in specific prosodic positions such as the coda. In a licensing by cue approach, as represented by Steriade (1995, 1999), on the other hand, segments are assumed to occur in those positions only where their perceptual cues are prominent, independent of the prosodic position. In positions where the cues are not salient, neutralization occurs

The diachronic emergence of retroflex segments in three languages

The present study shows that though retroflex segments can be considered articulatorily marked, there are perceptual reasons why languages introduce this class into their phoneme inventory. This observation is illustrated with the diachronic developments of retroflexes in Norwegian (North- Germanic), Nyawaygi (Australian) and Minto-Nenana (Athapaskan). The developments in these three languages are modelled in a perceptually oriented phonological theory, since traditional articulatorily-based features cannot deal with such processes

The role of linguistic experience in the hemispheric processing of lexical tone

This is the publisher's version, made available with the permission of the publisher.This study investigated hemispheric lateralization of Mandarin tone. Four groups of listeners were examined: native Mandarin listeners, English–Mandarin bilinguals, Norwegian listeners with experience with Norwegian tone, and American listeners with no tone experience. Tone pairs were dichotically presented and listeners identified which tone they heard in each ear. For the Mandarin listeners, 57% of the total errors occurred in the left ear, indicating a right-ear (left-hemisphere) advantage. The English– Mandarin bilinguals exhibited nativelike patterns, with 56% left-ear errors. However, no ear advantage was found for the Norwegian or American listeners (48 and 47% left-ear errors, respectively). Results indicate left-hemisphere dominance of Mandarin tone by native and proficient bilingual listeners, whereas nonnative listeners show no evidence of lateralization, regardless of their familiarity with lexical tone

Cross-linguistic exploration of phonemic representations

All languages around the world have their own vast sound inventories. Understanding each other through verbal communication requires, first of all, understanding each other\u2019s phonemes. This often overlooked constraint is non-trivial already among native speakers of the same language, given the variability with which we all articulate our phonemes. It becomes even more challenging when interacting with non-native speakers, who have developed neural representations of different sets of phonemes. How can the brain make sense of such diversity? It is remarkable that the sounds produced by the vocal tract, that have evolved to serve as sym-bols in natural languages, fall almost neatly into two classes with such different characteristics, consonants and vowels. Consonants are complex in nature: beyond acoustically-defined formant (resonant) frequencies, additional physical parameters such as formant transitions, the delay period in those transitions, energy bursts, the vibrations of the vocal cords occurring before and during the consonant burst, and the length of those vibrations are needed to identify them. Surprisingly, consonants are very quickly categorized through a quite mysterious form of invariant feature ex-traction. In contrast to consonants, vowels can be represented in a simple and transparent manner and that is because, amazingly, only two analog dimensions within a continuous space are essen-tially enough to characterize a vowel. The first dimension corresponds to the degree to which the vocal tract is open when producing the vowel and the second dimension is the location of the main occlusion. Surprisingly, these anatomically-defined production modes match very precisely the first two acoustically-defined formant frequencies, namely F1 and F2. While for some languages some additional features are necessary to specify a vowel, such as its length or roundedness, whose nature may be more discrete, for many others F1 and F2 are all there is to it. In this thesis, we use both behavioral (phoneme confusion frequencies) and neural measures (the spatio- temporal distribution of phoneme-evoked neural activation) to study the cross-linguistic organization of phoneme perception. In Chapter 2, we study the perception of consonants by repli-cating and extending a classical study on sub-phonemic features underlying perceptual differences between phonemes. Comparing the responses of native listeners to that of Italian, Turkish, Hebrew, and (Argentinian) Spanish listeners to a range of American English consonants, we look at the specific patterns of errors that speakers of different languages make by using the metric content index, which was previously used in entirely different contexts, with either discrete, e.g. in face space, or continuous representations, e.g. of the spatial environment. Beyond the analysis of percent correct score, and transmitted information, we frame the problem in terms of \u2018place attractors\u2019, in analogy to those which have been well studied in spatial memory. Through our experimental paradigm, we try to access distinct attractors in different languages. In the same chapter, we provide auditory evoked potentials of some consonant-vowel syllables, which hint at transparent processing of the vowels regulated by the first two formants that characterize them, and accordingly we then turn to investigating the vowel trajectories in the vowel manifold. We start our exploration of the vowel space in Chapter 3 by addressing a perceptually important third dimension for native Turkish speakers \u2013 that is rounding. Can native Turkish speakers navigate better vowel trajectories in which the second formant changes over a short time, to reflect rounding, compared to native Italian speakers, who are not required to make such fine discriminations on this dimension? We found no mother tongue effects. We have found, however, that rounding in vowels could be represented with similar efficiency by fine differences in a F2 peak frequency which is constant in time, or inverting the temporal dynamics of a changing F2, which then makes vowels not mere points in the space, but rather continuous trajectories.We walk through phoneme trajectories at every tens of milliseconds, it comes to us as nat-urally as walking in a room, if not more. Similar to spatial trajectories, we create equidistant continuous vowel trajectories in Chapter 4 on a vowel wheel positioned in the central region of the two-dimensional vowel space where in some languages like Italian there are no standard vowel categories, and in some other, like English, there are. Is the central region in languages like Italian to be regarded as a flat empty space with no attractors? Is there any reminiscence of their own phoneme memories? We ask whether this central region is flat, or can at least be flattened through extensive training. If so, would then we find a neural substrate that modulates the perception in the 2D vowel plane, similar to grid cell representation that is involved in the spatial navigation of empty 2D arenas? Our results are not suggestive of a grid-like representation, but rather points at the modulation of the neural signal by the position of Italian vowels around the outer contour of the wheel. Therefore in Chapter 5, we ask how our representation of the vowel space, not only in the central region but rather in the entirely of its linguistically relevant portion, is deformed by the presence of the standard categories of our vowel repertoire. We use \u2018belts\u2019, that are short stretches along which formant frequencies are varied quasi-continuously, to determine the local metric that best describes, for each language, the vowel manifold as a non-flat space constructed in our brain. As opposed to the \u2018consonant planes\u2019, that we constructed in Chapter 2, which appear to have a similar structure to a great extent, we find that the vowel plane is subjective and that it is language dependent. In light of language-specific transformations of the vowel plane, we wonder whether native bilinguals hold simultaneously multiple maps available and use one or the other to interpret linguistic sources depending on context. Or alternatively, we ask, do they construct and use a fusion of the two original maps, that allows them to efficiently discriminate vowel contrast that have to be discriminated in either language? The neural mechanisms underlying the physical map switch, known as remapping, have been well studied in rodent hippocampus; is the vowel map alternation governed by similar principles? We compare and show that the perceptual vowel maps of native Norwegian speakers, who are not bilingual but fluent in English, are unique, probably sculpted by their long-term memory codes, and we leave the curious case of bilinguals for future studies. Overall we attempt to investigate phoneme perception in a different framework compared to how it has been studied in the literature, which has been in the interest of a large community for many years, but largely disconnected from the study of cortical computation. Our aim is to demonstrate that insights about persisting questions in the field may be reached from another well explored part of cognition

Individual differences in the discrimination of novel speech sounds: effects of sex, temporal processing, musical and cognitive abilities

This study examined whether rapid temporal auditory processing, verbal working memory capacity, non-verbal intelligence, executive functioning, musical ability and prior foreign language experience predicted how well native English speakers (N = 120) discriminated Norwegian tonal and vowel contrasts as well as a non-speech analogue of the tonal contrast and a native vowel contrast presented over noise. Results confirmed a male advantage for temporal and tonal processing, and also revealed that temporal processing was associated with both non-verbal intelligence and speech processing. In contrast, effects of musical ability on non-native speech-sound processing and of inhibitory control on vowel discrimination were not mediated by temporal processing. These results suggest that individual differences in non-native speech-sound processing are to some extent determined by temporal auditory processing ability, in which males perform better, but are also determined by a host of other abilities that are deployed flexibly depending on the characteristics of the target sounds

Norwegian Retroflexion − Licensing by Cue or Prosody?

This article deals with the class of retroflex segments in Norwegian. The question is handled whether the phonotactic restrictions on retroflexes to occur mainly only in coda position cannot be better described in terms of the availability of the retroflex cues in post-vocalic position instead of refering to their syllable-position. The latter approach, the so-called prosodic licensing (Lombardi 1995), is shown to be insufficient in cases of retroflexion across word-boundaries, where retroflexes appear in onset-position. The so-called lincensing by cue-approach (Steriade 1995), on the other hand, is shown to be able to cover all the instances of retroflex occurrences: retroflexes in Norwegian occur only when a vowel precedes, which enhances their strong transitional cues from vowel to retroflex. In addition to this, licensing by cue can account for the progressive assimilation of retroflexion also found in Norwegian

Effects of exposure to noise during perceptual training of non-native language sounds

Listeners manage to acquire the sounds of their native language in spite of experiencing a range of acoustic conditions during acquisition, including the presence of noise. Is the same true for nonnative sound acquisition? This study investigates whether the presence of masking noise during consonant training is a barrier to improvement, or, conversely, whether noise can be beneficial. Spanish learners identified English consonants with and without noise, before and after undergoing one of four extensive training regimes in which they were exposed to either consonants or vowels in the presence or absence of speech-shaped noise. The consonant-trained cohorts showed substantially larger gains than the vowel-trained groups, regardless of whether they were trained in noise or quiet. A small matched-condition benefit was evident, with noise-training resulting in larger improvements when testing in noise, and vice versa for training in quiet. No evidence for habituation to noise was observed: the cohort trained on vowels in noise showed no transference to consonants in noise. These findings demonstrate that noise exposure does not impede the acquisition of second language sounds.This study was carried out with funding from the Basque Government Consolidados grant to the Language and Speech Laboratory at the University of the Basque Country

Production and perception of English consonants by Yemeni EFL learners

Previous studies on the perception-production correlation focused mainly on transcriptions and native English speaker evaluations for production accuracy assessments; only a few included acoustic measurements. This study aims to investigate the production and perception of six English consonants by Yemeni EFL learners of English using an acoustic measurement of second-language production. It has three objectives: (1) To investigate the extent to which word position influences the accuracy of Yemeni EFL learners’ production of the target consonants, (2) to assess the extent to which word position affects their perception, and (3) to investigate the relationship between the overall production and perception of the investigated sounds. A quantitative research method was employed for collecting data from six Yemeni EFL postgraduate students from Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM). In the production tasks, the researchers asked the speakers to produce seventy-two words with the target consonants three times in isolation (Experiment 1) and the other three times in a carrier sentence (Experiment 2). The researchers recorded the speakers’ productions with an iPhone and later evaluated them acoustically via Praat. In the perception test, an AXB experiment was conducted. The findings showed that word position significantly affected the production, yet not the perception of the target sounds. Moreover, an insignificant positive moderate correlation was revealed between the overall production and perception of the target consonants. The findings have implications for second-language speech as well as pronunciation instruction. Teachers may put more focus on specific sound environments that lead learners to struggle while producing/perceiving particular English sounds

The contribution of the visual modality to speech intelligibility in native and non-native speakers of English

Since the pandemic, masks have hindered speech intelligibility by obscuring visual cues, especially in foreign-accented speech. This study compares the effectiveness of visual cues provided by French L1 non-native English speakers and a native English speaker. It investigates vowels, using audio and audio-visual stimuli and native English perceivers (n = 24). Results show significant audio-visual benefits for both groups. However, the visual benefit varies across vowel feature and speaker group, with a negative impact observed for the French speaker group for central vowels /ʌ/ and /ə/. These findings highlight the influence of language-specific gestures on L2 production, including French lip-rounding