Using Peer-to-Peer Technology for Knowledge Sharing in Communities of Practices

Communities of Practices (CoPs) are informal structures within organizations that bind people together through informal relationships and the sharing of expertise and experience. As such, they are effective tools for the creation and sharing of organizational knowledge, and, increasingly, organizations are adopting them as part of their knowledge management strategies. In this paper, we examine the knowledge sharing characteristics and roles of CoPs and develop a peer-to-peer knowledge sharing architecture that matches the behavioral characteristics of the members of the CoPs. We also propose a peer-to-peer knowledge sharing tool called KTella that enables members of CoPs to voluntarily share and retrieve knowledge more effectively

Exploring peer-mentoring for community dwelling older adults with chronic low back pain: a qualitative study

Objectives To explore the perceptions of patients, physiotherapists, and potential peer mentors on the topic of peer-mentoring for self-management of chronic low back pain following discharge from physiotherapy. Design Exploratory, qualitative study. Participants Twelve patients, 11 potential peer mentors and 13 physiotherapists recruited from physiotherapy departments and community locations in one health board area of the UK. Interventions Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Main outcome measures Participants’ perceptions of the usefulness and appropriateness of peer-mentoring following discharge from physiotherapy. Data were processed and analysed using the framework method. Results Four key themes were identified: (i) self-management strategies, (ii) barriers to self-management and peer-mentoring, (iii) vision of peer-mentoring, and (iv) the voice of experience. Peer-mentoring may be beneficial for some older adults with chronic low back pain. Barriers to peer-mentoring were identified, and many solutions for overcoming them. No single format was identified as superior; participants emphasised the need for any intervention to be flexible and individualised. Important aspects to consider in developing a peer-mentoring intervention are recruitment and training of peer mentors and monitoring the mentor-mentee relationship. Conclusions This study has generated important knowledge that is being used to design and test a peer-mentoring intervention on a group of older people with chronic low back pain and volunteer peer mentors. If successful, peer-mentoring could provide a cost effective method of facilitating longer-term self-management of a significant health condition in older people

Peer review and the publication process

Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer reviewers, the purpose and significance of the peer review with regard to the assessment and management of quality of publications in academic journals. Design: Discussion paper. Methods: This paper draws on information gained from literature on the peer review process and the authors' knowledge and experience of contributing as peer reviewers and editors in the field of health care, including nursing. Results: There are various types of peer review: single blind; double blind; open; and post-publication review. The role of the reviewers in reviewing manuscripts and their contribution to the scientific and academic community remains important

TRUSTING REVIEW MECHANISMS IN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: ANTECEDENTS, OUTCOMES, AND THE ROLE OF PERCEIVED RISK

In recent years, the success of social media in the private realm has entailed an increasing awareness of opportunities that are linked to user-generated content in knowledge management systems. Alongside the benefits in terms of knowledge quantity, new quality risks arise from an unregulated knowledge contribution. Considering that, review mechanisms have been implemented to monitor the content and provide a basis to distinguish between good and poor quality knowledge assets. This paper proposes a model to uncover the role of trust in expert and peer reviews during the knowledge application process by considering its antecedents, its outcomes, and the influnce of perceived risk. The model suggests that trust in expert and peer reviews is based on the ability, benevolence, and integrity of the respective group and is positively influnced by a higher trustor´s propensity to trust. Perceived risk in a particular situation influnces the decision whether to apply knowledge based on trust in expert or in peer reviews. It is assumed that high-risk decisions are based on expert reviews more likely because the organizational and individual risk is perceived to be lowered, whereas peer reviews can only mitigate organizational risk

The Nutritional Management and Glycemic control in Adolescents with Diabetes

The purpose of this literature review is to explore the relationship of nutritional management on glycemic control amongst adolescents who have diabetes. The adolescent population has significant negative or positive peer influence on the management of their diabetes (Yang, 2018, p.104). These peer perceptions can include empathy, curiosity, knowledge seeking, enthusiasm, fearfulness, and bullying (Yang, 2018, p.104). These influences directly affect nutritional management, blood glucose levels, and insulin management. When the peer influence is negative the individual is less inclined to acknowledge their medical condition (Yang, 2018, p.105). Other influences on the management of diabetes include technology, physical exercise, and the individual\u27s diet. A literature review was performed on 20 peer reviewed journal articles exploring the different influences of the management of diabetes in adolescents. This was done by using two databases PubMed and Wiley plus using PICOT phrases as well as inclusion and exclusion criteria. The different influences of technology include telehealth appointments, communication with healthcare workers via apps, and tracking blood glucose and insulin levels. The impact of physical exercise and nutrition on the individual also plays an important role in the overall control of the individual\u27s management

Peer-mentors reflect on the benefits of mentoring: An autoethography

Many PhD candidates bring with them a wealth of knowledge and skills; however, these may not sufficiently prepare candidates to work with high autonomy on a project with often limited interaction with the wider research community. A peer-mentor program model, in which a mentor delivers dyadic and group support to higher degree by research students from different disciplines and backgrounds, has the potential to enhance candidates’ knowledge and skills. However, the mentors themselves can experience significant advantages, as peer-mentoring can also have a positive effect on the mentors’ research experience. In order to further understanding of the potential benefits of peer-mentoring for mentors, three researchers explore their experiences as peer-mentors through an autoethnographic framework. Through discussing their personal experiences as peer-mentors, the researchers identified a range of benefits for themselves. These benefits in-volved finding that peer- mentoring enhanced their own learning, fostered reflective practice, and provided current tertiary teaching and research support experience. Peer mentoring also gave them broad exposure to a breadth of disciplines, theories, and methods; provided project management insights; created opportunities for professional networking; supported their social needs; and gave them invaluable insight into other candidate/supervisor relationships. Their role in a peer-mentor model has shaped their experiences as PhD candidates and also informed their decisions after graduation