252 research outputs found

    Pattern formation and optimization in army ant raids

    Get PDF
    Army ant colonies display complex foraging raid patterns involving thousands of individuals communicating through chemical trails. In this paper we explore, by means of a simple search algorithm, the properties of these trails in order to test the hypothesis that their structure reflects an optimized mechanism for exploring and exploiting food resources. The raid patterns of three army ant species, {em Eciton hamatum}, {em Eciton burchelli} and {em Eciton rapax}, are analysed. The respective diets of these species involve large but rare, small but common, and a combination of large but rare and small but common, food sources. Using a model proposed by Deneubourg and collaborators, we simulate the formation of raid patterns in response to different food distributions. Our results indicate that the empirically observed raid patterns maximise return on investment, that is, the amount of food brought back to the nest per unit of energy expended, for each of the diets. Moreover, the values of the parameters that characterise the three optimal pattern-generating mechanisms are strikingly similar. Therefore the same behavioural rules at the individual level can produce optimal colony-level patterns. The evolutionary implications of these findings are discussed.Postprint (published version

    A Model for Collective Dynamics in Ant Raids

    Get PDF
    Ant raiding, the process of identifying and returning food to the nest or bivouac, is a fascinating example of collective motion in nature. During such raids ants lay pheromones to form trails for others to find a food source. In this work a coupled PDE/ODE model is introduced to study ant dynamics and pheromone concentration. The key idea is the introduction of two forms of ant dynamics: foraging and returning, each governed by different environmental and social cues. The model accounts for all aspects of the raiding cycle including local collisional interactions, the laying of pheromone along a trail, and the transition from one class of ants to another. Through analysis of an order parameter measuring the orientational order in the system, the model shows self-organization into a collective state consisting of lanes of ants moving in opposite directions as well as the transition back to the individual state once the food source is depleted matching prior experimental results. This indicates that in the absence of direct communication ants naturally form an efficient method for transporting food to the nest/bivouac. The model exhibits a continuous kinetic phase transition in the order parameter as a function of certain system parameters. The associated critical exponents are found, shedding light on the behavior of the system near the transition.Comment: Preprint Version, 30 pgs., 18 figures, complete version with supplementary movies to appear in Journal of Mathematical Biology (Springer

    Emerging robot swarm traffic

    Get PDF
    We discuss traffic patterns generated by swarms of robots while commuting to and from a base station. The overall question is whether to explicitly organise the traffic or whether a certain regularity develops `naturally'. Human driven motorized traffic is rigidly structured in two lanes. However, army ants develop a three-lane pattern in their traffic, while human pedestrians generate a main trail and secondary trials in either direction. Our robot swarm approach is bottom-up: designing individual agents we first investigate the mathematics of cases occurring when applying the artificial potential field method to three 'perfect' robots. We show that traffic lane pattern will not be disturbed by the internal system of forces. Next, we define models of sensor designs to account for the practical fact that robots (and ants) have limited visibility and compare the sensor models in groups of three robots. In the final step we define layouts of a highway: an unbounded open space, a trail with surpassable edges and a hard defined (walled) highway. Having defined the preliminaries we run swarm simulations and look for emerging traffic patterns. Apparently, depending on the initial situation a variety of lane patterns occurs, however, high traffic densities do delay the emergence of traffic lanes considerably. Overall we conclude that regularities do emerge naturally and can be turned into an advantage to obtain efficient robot traffic

    Individual rules for trail pattern formation in Argentine ants (Linepithema humile)

    Get PDF
    We studied the formation of trail patterns by Argentine ants exploring an empty arena. Using a novel imaging and analysis technique we estimated pheromone concentrations at all spatial positions in the experimental arena and at different times. Then we derived the response function of individual ants to pheromone concentrations by looking at correlations between concentrations and changes in speed or direction of the ants. Ants were found to turn in response to local pheromone concentrations, while their speed was largely unaffected by these concentrations. Ants did not integrate pheromone concentrations over time, with the concentration of pheromone in a 1 cm radius in front of the ant determining the turning angle. The response to pheromone was found to follow a Weber's Law, such that the difference between quantities of pheromone on the two sides of the ant divided by their sum determines the magnitude of the turning angle. This proportional response is in apparent contradiction with the well-established non-linear choice function used in the literature to model the results of binary bridge experiments in ant colonies (Deneubourg et al. 1990). However, agent based simulations implementing the Weber's Law response function led to the formation of trails and reproduced results reported in the literature. We show analytically that a sigmoidal response, analogous to that in the classical Deneubourg model for collective decision making, can be derived from the individual Weber-type response to pheromone concentrations that we have established in our experiments when directional noise around the preferred direction of movement of the ants is assumed.Comment: final version, 9 figures, submitted to Plos Computational Biology (accepted

    ๊ณค์ถฉ์˜ ์„ญ์‹ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ˜ํฌ์‹ ํ–‰๋™์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ์œ ์—ฐ์ „๋žต๊ณผ ๊ณ ์ •์ „๋žต

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ƒ๋ช…๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ํ”ผ์˜คํŠธ๋ฅด ์•ผ๋ธŒ์›์Šคํ‚ค.This dissertation presents my theoretical and empirical studies of flexibility focused on two topics of insect ethology. The first topic is the collective foraging strategy of the ants. Army ants were chosen as an example of extremely low behavioral flexibility in foraging; and on the other hand, carpenter ants were used to study mechanisms of extraordinarily high flexibility. My second interest is the behavioral control of aposematism, the phenomenon in which a defended prey animal gives a warning signal to predators who may recognize its advertised unprofitability. In my first study, I investigated theoretical benefits potentially associated with the evolution of specialized foraging behavior performed by army ants. It is known that a typical colony of Neotropical army ants (subfamily Ecitoninae) regularly raids a large area around their bivouac by forming a narrow directional column that can reach up to one hundred meters in length. Then the raid is finished and then relaunched 12โ€“17 times, each time toward different orientations before the colony relocates to a new area. A hypothetical alternative to this foraging mode is raiding radially and symmetrically by expanding the search front in every direction like a circular bubble. Using an existing agent-based modeling software that simulates army ants behavior, I compared the two possible modes of foraging in different food distributions. Regardless of the food patch abundance, the radial raiding was superior to the directional raiding when food patches had low quality, and the directional raiding was favored when the patches were rich. In terms of energy efficiency, the radial raiding was the better strategy in a wide range of conditions. In contrast, the directional raiding tended to yield more food per coverage area. Based on this model, I suggest that the directional raiding by army ants is an adaptation to the habitats with the abundance of high-quality food patches. This is the first theoretical argument for the adaptive value of the army ant behavioral syndrome which agrees with cumulated body of existing empirical measurements and descriptive models. This conclusion fits well with the known ecological conditions of army ants and their habitat. In the second study, I conducted field experiments using wild colonies of carpenter ants (Camponotus japonicus). Unlike the army ants which obligatorily maintain their tight marching column, C. japonicus shows considerable variation in the coherence when foraging in a group. My investigation on this variability was centered on three sub-questions. First, I observed if higher group dispersion resulted in the lower chances of reaching the food source. As a dispersed group would cover a wider search area collectively, I believed that there would be some balancing disadvantage that can explain the coexistence of coherent and dispersed foraging behaviors. Second, I explored if there is any correlation between the group coherence and the behavior of the scout, the key individual that first discovers the food source and subsequently summons multiple nestmates to the site. As the scouts of related species were known to have central control over their groups of recruits in various ways, I hypothesized that C. japonicus scouts would be also involved in the determination of group behavior. Third, I tested what would happen if I remove the scout from a group. I believed that the lack of scout pheromone would signal dispersion, as the scout seemed to be the source of coherence signals. After my analysis, I reached the following conclusions. First, higher group dispersion leads to lower success rates in correctly finding the food source. Second, the mobility of the scout in the pre-recruitment stage, her characteristic stroking behavior during recruitment, and the dispersion of the recruited group were correlated to each other. Third, the simple lack of scout signal was not adequate to explain the observed variable reactions of the abandoned followers, and their response was linked to the pre-recruitment behaviors of the scout. I believe that C. japonicus possesses one of the most complicated recruitment strategy among the entire Formicidae, and the above findings rendered this species one of the best-understood ants in terms of mechanisms through which the flexible group foraging is controlled. From the above two studies, I revealed each one of the ultimate and proximate mechanisms that maintain different levels of flexibility in ants foraging strategy. My final topic, the behaviorally controlled aposematism, is a variant of aposematism in which the defended prey animal can choose to give different levels of anti-predatory warning signals depending on the circumstances. This switching may occur in reaction to predators approach (pre-attack signals) or attack (post-attack signals). The switchable aposematism has been relatively poorly studied, but it could possess a variety of benefits. First, the switching could startle the predators (deimatism). Second, it could facilitate the aversive learning. Third, it could minimize the exposure or energetic expense, as the signal can be switched off. These potential benefits might offset the cost of developing, maintaining and utilizing the switchable traits. Here I focused on the third benefit of switchability, the cost-saving aspect, and developed an individual-based computer simulation of predators and prey. In 88 128 model runs, I observed the evolution of permanent, pre-attack, or post-attack aposematic signals of varying strength. I found that, in general, the pre-attack switchable aposematism may require moderate predator learning speed, high basal detectability, and moderate to high signal cost. On the other hand, the post-attack signals may arise under slow predator learning, low basal detectability, and high signal cost. When predator population turnover is fast, it may lead to the evolution of post-attack aposematic signals that are not conforming to the above tendency. I also suggest that the high switching cost may exert different pressure on the pre-attack and post-attack switchable strategies. To my knowledge, these are the first theoretical attempts to systematically explore the evolution of the switchable aposematism relative to permanent aposematism in defended prey. These findings in common provided novel view into the proximate and ultimate mechanisms of behavioral flexibility found in insects. In addition, they exposed limitations of our understanding that called for future studies. First, I expect agonistic interactions with competitors or prey animals would considerably affect the collective foraging, aposematism, and food aversion, but I could not successfully provide universal background for such effects within the currently available datasets and literature in spite of many efforts. Second, the qualitative difference of food items such as carbohydrate- or protein-richness is known to be pivotal in insect trophic ecology, but the scarcity of information and logistical limitations left me being unable to incorporate relevant enquiries into this dissertation. I predict that further discussions and experiments regarding these questions will reveal valuable information about the balance between the needs of resource exploitation and defense, which might greatly influence the behavioral flexibility of insects observed in the ecosystem.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๊ณค์ถฉ ํ–‰๋™ํ•™์ƒ์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฃผ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ด๋ก ์  ๋ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์˜ ์ง‘๋‹จ์  ์„ญ์‹ ์ „๋žต์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋จน์ด์ฐพ๊ธฐ ํ–‰๋™์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ๋‚ฎ์€ ํ–‰๋™์  ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ์˜ˆ์‹œ๋กœ ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’์€ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ „์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•  ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์™•๊ฐœ๋ฏธ๋ฅผ ํƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์–ด๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ํ”ผ์‹๋™๋ฌผ์ด ํฌ์‹์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์–ด ๊ทธ ๋ถ€์ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์„ ์•Œ๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ, ์ฆ‰ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ (aposematism) ์˜ ํ–‰๋™์  ํ†ต์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์˜ ํŠนํ™”๋œ ์„ญ์‹ ํ–‰๋™์ด ์ง„ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ํ•œ ์ด๋ก ์ ์ธ ์ด์ ๋“ค์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹ ์—ด๋Œ€๊ตฌ ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ (Ecitoninae์•„๊ณผ) ์˜ ์ง‘๋ฝ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ 100์—ฌ ๋ฏธํ„ฐ์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Š๋‹ค๋ž€ ํ–‰๋ ฌ์„ ํŠน์ • ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ง€ํ–ฅํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜์†Œ (bivouac) ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ๊ด‘ํ™œํ•œ ์ง€์—ญ์„ ๊ฐ•์Šตํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฐ•์Šต ํ–‰๋™์ด ๋งค๋ฒˆ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ 12-17๋ฒˆ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต๋œ ํ›„ ์ง‘๋ฝ์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ง€์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์ฃผํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋จน์ด์ฐพ๊ธฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๊ฐ€์„ค์ ์ธ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์€ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์ , ๋Œ€์นญ์ ์ธ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๊ฐ•์Šตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜์ƒ‰๋Œ€์˜ ์ตœ์ „์„ ์ด ์ ์ฐจ ํ™•์žฅ๋˜๋Š” ์›ํ˜•์„ ํ˜•์„ฑํ•˜๋„๋ก ์ „์ง„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋จน์ด์ฐพ๊ธฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋จน์ด์ž์› ๋ถ„ํฌ ํ•˜์—์„œ ๋น„๊ตํ•ด๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์˜ ํ–‰๋™์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ฐœ์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋จน์ดํŒจ์น˜์˜ ์งˆ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋จน์ดํŒจ์น˜์˜ ํ’๋ถ€๋„์™€ ๋ฌด๊ด€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํ˜• ๊ฐ•์Šต ํ–‰๋™์€ ์ง€ํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๊ฐ•์Šต๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์›”ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๋จน์ดํŒจ์น˜์˜ ์งˆ์ด ๋†’์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ง€ํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๊ฐ•์Šต์ด ์œ ๋ฆฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํšจ์œจ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑด์— ๊ฑธ์ณ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํ˜• ๊ฐ•์Šต์ด ๋” ๋‚˜์€ ์ „๋žต์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ์— ๋ฐ˜ํ•ด, ์ง€ํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๊ฐ•์Šต์€ ํƒ์ƒ‰ ๋ฉด์  ๋‹น ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋จน์ด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์˜ ์ง€ํ–ฅ์„ฑ ๊ฐ•์Šต ํ–‰๋™์ด ์–‘์งˆ์˜ ๋จน์ดํŒจ์น˜๊ฐ€ ํ’๋ถ€ํ•œ ์„œ์‹์ง€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ์ ์‘ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ž„์„ ์ฃผ์žฅํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ง€๊ธˆ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋ˆ„์ ๋œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์ธก์ •๊ฐ’ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์  ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ ํ–‰๋™๊ตฐ (behavioral syndrome) ์˜ ์ ์‘์  ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๋Š” ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ ์ด๋ก ์  ๋…ผ์ฆ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์€ ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์™€ ๊ทธ ์„œ์‹์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ์ƒํƒœํ•™์  ์ง€์‹๊ณผ ์ž˜ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์™•๊ฐœ๋ฏธ (Camponotus japonicus)์˜ ์•ผ์ƒ ์ง‘๋ฝ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•ผ์™ธ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‘์ง‘๋œ ํ–‰์ง„ ๋Œ€์—ด๋งŒ์„ ์ ˆ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตฐ๋Œ€๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์™€ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ, C. japonicus๋Š” ์ง‘๋‹จ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋จน์ด๋ฅผ ์ฐพ์„ ๋•Œ ์‘์ง‘๋„์˜ ๋ณ€์‚ฐ์ด ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ํฌ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•˜์œ„ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ด ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ง‘๋‹จ์˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์œผ๋ฉด ๋จน์ด์›์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Š” ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง€๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋Š”๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋œ ์ง‘๋‹จ์€ ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์•˜์„ ๋•Œ ๋” ๋„“์€ ๋ฉด์ ์„ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ๊ฐ์•ˆํ•  ๋•Œ, ๊ทธ์— ๋Œ€์‘๋˜๋Š” ๋‹จ์ ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ์‘์ง‘ํ˜• ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์‚ฐํ˜• ์ง‘๋‹จ์ด ๊ณต์กดํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฆฌ๋ผ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์ฒ˜์Œ์œผ๋กœ ๋จน์ด์›์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์ดํ›„์— ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๋™๋ฃŒ๋“ค์„ ๋ถˆ๋Ÿฌ๋ชจ์œผ๋Š” ์ค‘์‹ฌ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์ธ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์˜ ํ–‰๋™์ด ์ง‘๋‹จ์  ์‘์ง‘๋„์™€ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๋Š”์ง€ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทผ์—ฐ์ข…์˜ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘๋“ค์ด ์†Œ์ง‘๋œ ์ง‘๋‹จ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ํ†ต์ œ๋ ฅ์„ ํ–‰์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ, C. japonicus ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘ ์—ญ์‹œ ์ง‘๋‹จ ํ–‰๋™์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ง‘๋‹จ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์–ด๋–ค ๋ฐ˜์‘์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š”์ง€ ์‹œํ—˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์ด ์‘์ง‘ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ๊ทผ์›์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ, ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘ ํŽ˜๋กœ๋ชฌ์˜ ๋ถ€์žฌ๋Š” ๊ณง ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋กœ ํ•ด์„๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๋“ค์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ง‘๋‹จ์˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์œผ๋ฉด ๋จน์ด์›์„ ์˜ฌ๋ฐ”๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ฐพ์•„๋‚ด๋Š” ์„ฑ๊ณต๋ฅ ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง„๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์†Œ์ง‘ ์ „๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์˜ ์ด๋™์„ฑ, ์†Œ์ง‘ ์ค‘ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์˜ ํš๊ธ‹๊ธฐ ํ–‰๋™, ์†Œ์ง‘๋œ ์ง‘๋‹จ์˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋„๋Š” ๋ชจ๋‘ ์„œ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ๋‹จ์ˆœ ๋ถ€์žฌ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ๋‚จ๊ฒจ์ง„ ์ถ”์ข…์ž๋“ค์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋“ค์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‘์€ ์†Œ์ง‘ ์ „๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ •์ฐฐ๋ณ‘์ด ๋ณด์˜€๋˜ ํ–‰๋™๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. C. japonicus๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ‹€์–ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์†Œ์ง‘์ „๋žต์„ ์ง€๋‹Œ ์ข… ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์œ„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ง‘๋‹จ์  ์„ญ์‹ํ–‰๋™์˜ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ทธ ์ œ์–ด๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ ์ด ์ข…์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋„๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ ์ค‘ ์ตœ๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ์ด๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ„์˜ ๋‘ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ์˜ ์„ญ์‹ ์ „๋žต์—์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์ด ์œ ์ง€๋˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ถ๊ทน์  ๋ฐ ์ง์ ‘์  ๊ธฐ์ „ ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์ง€์”ฉ์„ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” ํ–‰๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ†ต์ œ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ, ์ฆ‰ ๋ฐฉ์–ด๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ–์ถ˜ ํ”ผ์‹๋™๋ฌผ์ด ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ฐ˜ํฌ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ํƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ „ํ™˜ ์€ ํฌ์‹์ž์˜ ์ ‘๊ทผ์— ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ๊ณ  (๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ „ ์‹ ํ˜ธ) ๋˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์— ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ผ ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค (๊ณต๊ฒฉํ›„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ). ์ „ํ™˜๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ๋น„๊ต์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ž˜ ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋‚˜, ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ด์ ์„ ์ง€๋‹ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ „ํ™˜ ํ–‰๋™ ์ž์ฒด๊ฐ€ ํฌ์‹์ž๋ฅผ ๋†€๋ผ๊ฒŒ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ํšŒํ”ผ ํ•™์Šต์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๊บผ ๋†“์Œ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ถˆํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋…ธ์ถœ์ด๋‚˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์†Œ๋ชจ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ž ์žฌ์ ์ธ ์ด์ ๋“ค์€ ์ „ํ™˜ํ˜• ํ˜•์งˆ์„ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ  ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ƒ์‡„ํ•  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ „ํ™˜๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์˜ ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์จฐ ์ด์ , ์ฆ‰ ๋น„์šฉ ์ ˆ๊ฐ ์ธก๋ฉด์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”์–ด ํฌ์‹์ž์™€ ํ”ผ์‹์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 88,128ํšŒ์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ตฌ๋™์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ์˜๊ตฌ์ , ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ „ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ฒฉํ›„ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ „ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ์ค‘๋“ฑ๋„์˜ ํฌ์‹์ž ํ•™์Šต์†๋„, ๋†’์€ ๊ธฐ์ € ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋ฅ , ์ค‘๋“ฑ๋„์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋„์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋ฆฌ๋ผ๋Š” ์ ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ์— ๋ฐ˜ํ•ด ๊ณต๊ฒฉํ›„ ์ง„ํ˜ธ๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์€ ํฌ์‹์ž ํ•™์Šต์†๋„, ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ธฐ์ € ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋ฅ , ๋†’์€ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋น„์šฉ ํ•˜์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. ํฌ์‹์ž ๊ฐœ์ฒด๊ตฐ์˜ ํšŒ์ „์ด ๋น ๋ฅธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์œ„์˜ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚œ ๊ณต๊ฒฉํ›„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ง„ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋†’์€ ์ „ํ™˜๋น„์šฉ์ด ๊ณต๊ฒฉ์ „ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ฒฉํ›„ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ „๋žต์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์••๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฆฌ๋ผ๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋“ค์€ ๋ฐฉ์–ด๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ํ”ผ์‹๋™๋ฌผ์—์„œ ์˜๊ตฌ์  ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ „ํ™˜๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ ์ตœ์ดˆ์˜ ์ด๋ก ์  ์‹œ๋„์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋“ค์€ ๊ณตํ†ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณค์ถฉ์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ํ–‰๋™์  ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์˜ ์ง์ ‘์  ๋ฐ ๊ถ๊ทน์  ๊ธฐ์ „์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹œ๊ฐ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ํ›„์† ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ดํ•ด์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋…ธ์ถœํ•˜๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ž๋‚˜ ํ”ผ์‹์ž์™€์˜ ์ ๋Œ€์  ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์ด ์ง‘๋‹จ์„ญ์‹, ๊ฒฝ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๋ฐ ํšŒํ”ผํ•™์Šต์— ์ƒ๋‹นํžˆ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ผ์น  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋˜๋‚˜, ๋งŽ์€ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ํ˜„์žฌ ๊ฐ€์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์ด๊ฐ™์€ ํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ฒ”์šฉ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์ง€์‹์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ํƒ„์ˆ˜ํ™”๋ฌผ ๋˜๋Š” ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋จน์ด์ž์›์˜ ์งˆ์  ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๊ณค์ถฉ์˜ ์˜์–‘์ƒํƒœ์— ์ค‘๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค€๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์ •๋ณด์˜ ํฌ๋ฐ•ํ•จ๊ณผ ์ž์›์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ํฌํ•จ์‹œํ‚ค์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์งˆ๋ฌธ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๋…ผ์˜์™€ ์‹คํ—˜์ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„๋‹ค๋ฉด, ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜๋Š” ๊ณค์ถฉ์˜ ํ–‰๋™์  ์œ ์—ฐ์„ฑ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ์„ ์ž์› ํš๋“๊ณผ ๋ฐฉ์–ด์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ •๋ณด๋“ค์ด ๋ฐํ˜€์ง€๋ฆฌ๋ผ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค.CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1. 1 Opening remarks 1 1. 2 Behavioral flexibility in ant foraging 3 1. 3 Behavioral flexibility in aposematism 5 CHAPTER 2. WHY DO ARMY ANTS, AND ONLY ARMY ANTS, FORAGE IN COLUMNS? 7 2. 1 Introduction 8 2. 2 Methods 9 2. 3 Results 11 2. 4 Discussion 12 CHAPTER 3. COLUMNAR FORAGING WITH VARYING COHESIVENESS: BEHAVIOR OF Camponotus japonicus 20 3. 1 Introduction 20 3. 2 Methods 24 3. 3 Results 33 3. 4 Discussion 35 CHAPTER 4. SWITCHABLE APOSEMATISM: A BEHAVIORALLY CONTROLLED WARNING SIGNAL 65 4. 1 Introduction 66 4. 2 Methods 71 4. 3 Results 90 4. 4 Discussion 93 4. 5 Appendix 122 CHAPTER 5. GENERAL CONCLUSION 140 REFERENCES 145 ๊ตญ ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ ๋ก 159 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 164Docto

    Mechanisms for the Evolution of Superorganismality in Ants

    Get PDF
    Ant colonies appear to behave as superorganisms; they exhibit very high levels of within-colony cooperation, and very low levels of within-colony conflict. The evolution of such superorganismality has occurred multiple times across the animal phylogeny, and indeed, origins of multicellularity represent the same evolutionary process. Understanding the origin and elaboration of superorganismality is a major focus of research in evolutionary biology. Although much is known about the ultimate factors that permit the evolution and persistence of superorganisms, we know relatively little about how they evolve. One limiting factor to the study of superorganismality is the difficulty of conducting manipulative experiments in social insect colonies. Recent work on establishing the clonal raider ant, Ooceraea biroi, as a tractable laboratory model, has helped alleviate this difficulty. In this dissertation, I study the proximate evolution of superorganismality in ants. Using focussed mechanistic experiments in O. biroi, in combination with comparative work from other ant species, I study three major aspects of ant social behaviour that provide insight into the origin, maintenance, and elaboration of superorganismality. First, I ask how ants evolved to live in colonies, and how they evolved a reproductive division of labour. A comparative transcriptomic screen across the ant phylogeny, combined with experimental manipulations in O. biroi, finds that reproductive ants have higher insulin levels than their non-reproductive nestmates, and that this likely regulates the reproductive division of labour. Using these data, as well as studies of the idiosyncrasies of O. biroiโ€™s life history, I propose a mechanism for the evolution of the first colonies. It is possible that similar mechanisms underlie the evolution of reproductive division of labour in other superorganisms, and of germ-soma separation in nascent multicellular individuals. Second, I ask how ant workers assess colony hunger to regulate their foraging behaviour. I find that workers use larval signals, but not their own nutritional states, to decide how much to forage. In contrast, they use their nutritional states, but not larval signals, to decide how much to eat, suggesting that in at least some ant species, foraging and feeding have been decoupled. This evolution of colony-level foraging regulation has occurred convergently in hymenopteran superorganisms, and is analogous to the evolution of centralised regulation of foraging behaviour in multicellular animals. Finally, I ask how an iconic collective foraging behaviour โ€“ the mass raids of army ants โ€“ evolved. I find that O. biroi, a relative of army ants, forages collectively in group raids, that these are ancestral to the mass raids of army ants, and that the transition from group to mass raiding correlates with expansion in colony size. I propose that the scaling effects of increasing colony size explain this transition. It is possible that similar principles underlie the evolution of disparate collective behaviours in other animal groups and among cells within developing animals. Together, these studies illuminate the life history of O. biroi, and suggest mechanisms for the evolution of core aspects of cooperative behaviour in ant colonies. I draw comparisons to the evolution of superorganismality in other lineages, as well as to the evolution of multicellularity. I suggest that there may be additional similarities in the proximate evolutionary trajectories of superorganismality and multicellularity

    Pheromone-based Swarming for Position-less MAVs

    Get PDF
    Unlike existing aerial swarm systems, we aim at developing algorithms which do not require global or relative positioning information concerning agents and their neighbors. This alleviates the need for sensors which require calibration, are expensive and heavy or unusable because of environmental constraints. Rather than positioning, MAVs rely only on simple sensors (magnetic compass, speed sensor and altitude sensor) and local communication with neighbors. Our endeavor is motivated by an application whereby Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs) must organize autonomously to establish a robust communication network between users located on ground. Such a system is aimed towards the rapid and easy deployment of communication networks in disaster areas

    Diversity, Biogeography and Community Ecology of Ants

    Get PDF
    Ants are a ubiquitous, highly diverse, and ecologically dominant faunal group. They represent a large proportion of global terrestrial faunal biomass and play key ecological roles as soil engineers, predators, and re-cyclers of nutrients. They have particularly important interactions with plants as defenders against herbivores, as seed dispersers, and as seed predators. One downside to the ecological importance of ants is that they feature on the list of the worldโ€™s worst invasive species. Ants have also been important for science as model organisms for studies of diversity, biogeography, and community ecology. Despite such importance, ants remain remarkably understudied. A large proportion of species are undescribed, the biogeographic histories of most taxa remain poorly known, and we have a limited understanding of spatial patterns of diversity and composition, along with the processes driving them. The papers in this Special Issue collectively address many of the most pressing questions relating to ant diversity. What is the level of ant diversity? What is the origin of this diversity, and how is it distributed at different spatial scales? What are the roles of niche partitioning and competition as regulators of local diversity? How do ants affect the ecosystems within which they occur? The answers to these questions provide valuable insights not just for ants, but for biodiversity more generally

    Simulating the evolution of recruitment behavior in foraging Ants

    Get PDF
    Spatial heterogeneity in the distribution of food is an important determinant of species\u27 optimal foraging strategies, and of the dynamics of populations and communities. In order to explore the interaction of food heterogeneity and colony size in their effects on the behavior of foraging ant colonies, we built agent-based models of the foraging and recruitment behavior of harvester ants of the genus Pogonomyrmex. We optimized the behavior of these models using genetic algorithms over a variety of food distributions and colony sizes, and validated their behavior by comparison with data collected on harvester ants foraging for seeds in the field. We compared two models: one in which ants lay a pheromone trail each time they return to the nest with food; and another in which ants lay pheromone trails selectively, depending on the density of other food available in the area where food was found. We found that the density-dependent trail-laying model fit the field data better. We found that in this density-dependent recruitment model, colonies of all sizes evolved intense recruitment behavior, even when optimized for environments in which the majority of foods are distributed homogeneously. We discuss the implications of these models to the understanding of optimal foraging strategy and community dynamics among ants, and potential for application to ACO and other distributed problem-solving systems
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore