Do Random and Chaotic Sequences Really Cause Different PSO Performance?

Our topic is performance differences between using random and chaos for particle swarm optimization (PSO). We take random sequences with different probability distributions and compare them to chaotic sequences with different but also with same density functions. This enables us to differentiate between differences in the origin of the sequences (random number generator or chaotic nonlinear system) and statistical differences expressed by the underlying distributions. Our findings (obtained by evaluating the PSO performance for various benchmark problems using statistical hypothesis testing) cast considerable doubt on previous results which compared random to chaos and suggested that the choice leads to intrinsic differences in performance.Comment: Proc. GECCO 23 Companion, July 15-19, 2023, Lisbon, Portugal, accepte

PSO algorithm enhanced with Lozi Chaotic Map - Tuning experiment

In this paper it is investigated the effect of tuning of control parameters of the Lozi Chaotic Map employed as a chaotic pseudo-random number generator for the particle swarm optimization algorithm. Three different benchmark functions are selected from the IEEE CEC 2013 competition benchmark set. The Lozi map is extensively tuned and the performance of PSO is evaluated

Performance of Multi-chaotic PSO on a shifted benchmark functions set

In this paper the performance of Multi-chaotic PSO algorithm is investigated using two shifted benchmark functions. The purpose of shifted benchmark functions is to simulate the time-variant real-world problems. The results of chaotic PSO are compared with canonical version of the algorithm. It is concluded that using the multi-chaotic approach can lead to better results in optimization of shifted functions

Gravitational Swarm Optimizer for Global Optimization

In this article, a new meta-heuristic method is proposed by combining particle swarm optimization (PSO) and gravitational search in a coherent way. The advantage of swarm intelligence and the idea of a force of attraction between two particles are employed collectively to propose an improved meta-heuristic method for constrained optimization problems. Excellent constraint handling is always required for the success of any constrained optimizer. In view of this, an improved constraint-handling method is proposed which was designed in alignment with the constitutional mechanism of the proposed algorithm. The design of the algorithm is analyzed in many ways and the theoretical convergence of the algorithm is also established in the article. The e�fficiency of the proposed technique was assessed by solving a set of 24 constrained problems and 15 unconstrained problems which have been proposed in IEEE-CEC sessions 2006 and 2015, respectively. The results are compared with 11 state-of-the-art algorithms for constrained problems and 6 state-of-the-art algorithms for unconstrained problems. A variety of ways are considered to examine the ability of the proposed algorithm in terms of its converging ability, success, and statistical behavior. The performance of the proposed constraint-handling method is judged by analyzing its ability to produce a feasible population. It was concluded that the proposed algorithm performs e�fficiently with good results as a constrained optimizer

A Comprehensive Survey on Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications

Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is a heuristic global optimization method, proposed originally by Kennedy and Eberhart in 1995. It is now one of the most commonly used optimization techniques. This survey presented a comprehensive investigation of PSO. On one hand, we provided advances with PSO, including its modifications (including quantum-behaved PSO, bare-bones PSO, chaotic PSO, and fuzzy PSO), population topology (as fully connected, von Neumann, ring, star, random, etc.), hybridization (with genetic algorithm, simulated annealing, Tabu search, artificial immune system, ant colony algorithm, artificial bee colony, differential evolution, harmonic search, and biogeography-based optimization), extensions (to multiobjective, constrained, discrete, and binary optimization), theoretical analysis (parameter selection and tuning, and convergence analysis), and parallel implementation (in multicore, multiprocessor, GPU, and cloud computing forms). On the other hand, we offered a survey on applications of PSO to the following eight fields: electrical and electronic engineering, automation control systems, communication theory, operations research, mechanical engineering, fuel and energy, medicine, chemistry, and biology. It is hoped that this survey would be beneficial for the researchers studying PSO algorithms

Particle swarm optimization algorithm driven by multichaotic number generator

In this paper, the utilization of different chaotic systems as pseudo-random number generators (PRNGs) for velocity calculation in the PSO algorithm are proposed. Two chaos-based PRNGs are used alternately within one run of the PSO algorithm and dynamically switched over when a certain criterion is met. By using this unique technique, it is possible to improve the performance of PSO algorithm as it is demonstrated on different benchmark functions.Web of Science18463963