Modeling and Analysis of Software Product Line Variability in Clafer

Both feature and class modeling are used in Software Product Line (SPL) engineering to model variability. Feature models are used primarily to represent user-visible characteristics (i.e., features) of products; whereas class models are often used to model types of components and connectors in a product-line architecture. Previous works have explored the approach of using a single language to express both configurations of features and components. Their goal was to simplify the definition and analysis of feature-to-component mappings and to allow modeling component options as features. A prominent example of this approach is cardinality-based feature modeling, which extends feature models with multiple instantiation and references to express component-like, replicated features. Another example is to support feature modeling in a class modeling language, such as UML or MOF, using their profiling mechanisms and a stylized use of composition. Both examples have notable drawbacks: cardinality-based feature modeling lacks a constraint language and a well-defined semantics; encoding feature models as class models and their evolution bring extra complexity. This dissertation presents Clafer (class, feature, reference), a class modeling language with first-class support for feature modeling. Clafer can express rich structural models augmented with complex constraints, i.e., domain, variability, component models, and meta-models. Clafer supports: (i) class-based meta-models, (ii) object models (with uncertainty, if needed), (iii) feature models with attributes and multiple instantiation, (iv) configurations of feature models, (v) mixtures of meta- and feature models and model templates, and (vi) first-order logic constraints. Clafer also makes it possible to arrange models into multiple specialization and extension layers via constraints and inheritance. On the other hand, in designing Clafer we wanted to create a language that builds upon as few concepts as possible, and is easy to learn. The language is supported by tools for SPL verification and optimization. We propose to unify basic modeling constructs into a single concept, called clafer. In other words, Clafer is not a hybrid language. We identify several key mechanisms allowing a class modeling language to express feature models concisely. We provide Clafer with a formal semantics built in a novel, structurally explicit way. As Clafer subsumes cardinality-based feature modeling with attributes, references, and constraints, we are the first to precisely define semantics of such models. We also explore the notion of partial instantiation that allows for modeling with uncertainty and variability. We show that Object-Oriented Modeling (OOM) languages with no direct support for partial instances can support them via class modeling, using subclassing and strengthening multiplicity constraints. We make the encoding of partial instances via subclassing precise and general. Clafer uses this encoding and pushes the idea even further: it provides a syntactic unification of types and (partial) instances via subclassing and redefinition. We evaluate Clafer analytically and experimentally. The analytical evaluation shows that Clafer can concisely express feature and meta-models via a uniform syntax and unified semantics. The experimental evaluation shows that: 1) Clafer can express a variety of realistic rich structural models with complex constraints, such as variability models, meta-models, model templates, and domain models; and 2) that useful analyses can be performed within seconds

Kevoree Modeling Framework (KMF): Efficient modeling techniques for runtime use

The creation of Domain Specific Languages(DSL) counts as one of the main goals in the field of Model-Driven Software Engineering (MDSE). The main purpose of these DSLs is to facilitate the manipulation of domain specific concepts, by providing developers with specific tools for their domain of expertise. A natural approach to create DSLs is to reuse existing modeling standards and tools. In this area, the Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) has rapidly become the defacto standard in the MDSE for building Domain Specific Languages (DSL) and tools based on generative techniques. However, the use of EMF generated tools in domains like Internet of Things (IoT), Cloud Computing or Models@Runtime reaches several limitations. In this paper, we identify several properties the generated tools must comply with to be usable in other domains than desktop-based software systems. We then challenge EMF on these properties and describe our approach to overcome the limitations. Our approach, implemented in the Kevoree Modeling Framework (KMF), is finally evaluated according to the identified properties and compared to EMF.Comment: ISBN 978-2-87971-131-7; N° TR-SnT-2014-11 (2014

Evaluation of Kermeta for Solving Graph-based Problems

Kermeta is a meta-language for specifying the structure and behavior of graphs of interconnected objects called models. In this paper,\ud we show that Kermeta is relatively suitable for solving three graph-based\ud problems. First, Kermeta allows the specification of generic model\ud transformations such as refactorings that we apply to different metamodels\ud including Ecore, Java, and Uml. Second, we demonstrate the extensibility\ud of Kermeta to the formal language Alloy using an inter-language model\ud transformation. Kermeta uses Alloy to generate recommendations for\ud completing partially specified models. Third, we show that the Kermeta\ud compiler achieves better execution time and memory performance compared\ud to similar graph-based approaches using a common case study. The\ud three solutions proposed for those graph-based problems and their\ud evaluation with Kermeta according to the criteria of genericity,\ud extensibility, and performance are the main contribution of the paper.\ud Another contribution is the comparison of these solutions with those\ud proposed by other graph-based tools

Moving beyond a limited follow-up in cost-effectiveness analyses of behavioral interventions

Background Cost-effectiveness analyses of behavioral interventions typically use a dichotomous outcome criterion. However, achieving behavioral change is a complex process involving several steps towards a change in behavior. Delayed effects may occur after an intervention period ends, which can lead to underestimation of these interventions. To account for such delayed effects, intermediate outcomes of behavioral change may be used in cost-effectiveness analyses. The aim of this study is to model cognitive parameters of behavioral change into a cost-effectiveness model of a behavioral intervention. Methods The cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of an existing dataset from an RCT in which an high-intensity smoking cessation intervention was compared with a medium-intensity intervention, was re-analyzed by modeling the stages of change of the Transtheoretical Model of behavioral change. Probabilities were obtained from the dataset and literature and a sensitivity analysis was performed. Results In the original CEA over the first 12 months, the high-intensity intervention dominated in approximately 58% of the cases. After modeling the cognitive parameters to a future 2nd year of follow-up, this was the case in approximately 79%. Conclusion This study showed that modeling of future behavioral change in CEA of a behavioral intervention further strengthened the results of the standard CEA. Ultimately, modeling future behavioral change could have important consequences for health policy development in general and the adoption of behavioral interventions in particular