27,484 research outputs found

    How far can Nim in disguise be stretched?

    Get PDF
    A move in the game of nim consists of taking any positive number of tokens from a single pile. Suppose we add the class of moves of taking a nonnegative number of tokens jointly from all the piles. We give a complete answer to the question which moves in the class can be adjoined without changing the winning strategy of nim. The results apply to other combinatorial games with unbounded Sprague-Grundy function values. We formulate two weakened conditions of the notion of nim-sum 0 for proving the results.Comment: To appear in J. Combinatorial Theory (A

    Parity of Sets of Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squares

    Full text link
    Every Latin square has three attributes that can be even or odd, but any two of these attributes determines the third. Hence the parity of a Latin square has an information content of 2 bits. We extend the definition of parity from Latin squares to sets of mutually orthogonal Latin squares (MOLS) and the corresponding orthogonal arrays (OA). Suppose the parity of an OA(k,n)\mathrm{OA}(k,n) has an information content of dim(k,n)\dim(k,n) bits. We show that dim(k,n)(k2)1\dim(k,n) \leq {k \choose 2}-1. For the case corresponding to projective planes we prove a tighter bound, namely dim(n+1,n)(n2)\dim(n+1,n) \leq {n \choose 2} when nn is odd and dim(n+1,n)(n2)1\dim(n+1,n) \leq {n \choose 2}-1 when nn is even. Using the existence of MOLS with subMOLS, we prove that if dim(k,n)=(k2)1\dim(k,n)={k \choose 2}-1 then dim(k,N)=(k2)1\dim(k,N) = {k \choose 2}-1 for all sufficiently large NN. Let the ensemble of an OA\mathrm{OA} be the set of Latin squares derived by interpreting any three columns of the OA as a Latin square. We demonstrate many restrictions on the number of Latin squares of each parity that the ensemble of an OA(k,n)\mathrm{OA}(k,n) can contain. These restrictions depend on nmod4n\mod4 and give some insight as to why it is harder to build projective planes of order n2mod4n \not= 2\mod4 than for n2mod4n \not= 2\mod4. For example, we prove that when n2mod4n \not= 2\mod 4 it is impossible to build an OA(n+1,n)\mathrm{OA}(n+1,n) for which all Latin squares in the ensemble are isotopic (equivalent to each other up to permutation of the rows, columns and symbols)

    Parity properties of Costas arrays defined via finite fields

    Full text link
    A Costas array of order nn is an arrangement of dots and blanks into nn rows and nn columns, with exactly one dot in each row and each column, the arrangement satisfying certain specified conditions. A dot occurring in such an array is even/even if it occurs in the ii-th row and jj-th column, where ii and jj are both even integers, and there are similar definitions of odd/odd, even/odd and odd/even dots. Two types of Costas arrays, known as Golomb-Costas and Welch-Costas arrays, can be defined using finite fields. When qq is a power of an odd prime, we enumerate the number of even/even odd/odd, even/odd and odd/even dots in a Golomb-Costas array. We show that three of these numbers are equal and they differ by ±1\pm 1 from the fourth. For a Welch-Costas array of order p1p-1, where pp is an odd prime, the four numbers above are all equal to (p1)/4(p-1)/4 when p1(mod4)p\equiv 1\pmod{4}, but when p3(mod4)p\equiv 3\pmod{4}, we show that the four numbers are defined in terms of the class number of the imaginary quadratic field Q(p)\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-p}), and thus behave in a much less predictable manner.Comment: To appear in Advances in Mathematics of Communication
    corecore