Solving Equality Reasoning Problems with a Connection Graph Theorem Prover

The integration of a Knuth-Bendix completion algorithm into a paramodulation theorem prover on the basis of a connection graph resolution procedure is presented. The Knuth-Bendix completion idea is compared to a decomposition approach, and some ideas to handle conditional equations are discussed. The contents of this paper is not intended to present new material on term rewriting, instead it is more a pleading for the usage of completion ideas in automated deduction. It records our experience with an actual implementation of a hybrid system, where a completion procedure was imbedded into a connection graph theorem prover, the MKRP-system, with satisfactory positive results

Theory Unification in Abstract Clause Graphs

Clause Graphs, as they were defined in the 1970s, are graphs representing first order formulas in conjunctive normal form together with the resolution possibilities. The nodes are labelled with literals and the edges (links) connect complementary unifiable literals. This report describes a generalization of this concept, called abstract clause graphs. The nodes of abstract clause graphs are still labelled with literals, the links however connect literals that are "unifiable" relative to a given relation between literals. This relation is not explicitely defined; only certain "abstract" properties are required. for instance the existence of a special purpose unification algorithm is assumed which computes substitutions, the application of which makes the relation hold for two literals. When instances of already existing literals are added to the graph (e.g. due to resolution or factoring), the links to the new literals are derived from the links of their ancestors. An inheritance mechanism for such links is presented which operates only on the attached substitutions and does not have to unify the literals. This solves a long standing open problem of connection graph calculi: how to inherit links (with several unifiers attached) such that no unifier has to be computed more than once

Proof Transformation with Built-in Equality Predicate

One of the main reasons why computer generated proofs are not widely accepted is often their complexity and incomprehensibility. Especially proofs of mathematical theorems with equations are normally presented in an inadequate and not intuitive way. This is even more of a problem for the presentation of inferences drawn by automated reasoning components in other AI systems. For first order logic, proof transformation procedures have been designed in order to structure proofs and state them in a formalism that is more familiar to human mathematicians. In this report we generalize these approaches, so that proofs involving equational reasoning can also be handled. To this end extended refutation graphs are introduced to represent combined resolution and paramodulation proofs. In the process of transforming these proofs into natural deduction proofs with equality, the inherent structure can also be extracted by exploiting topological properties of refutation graphs

An analysis and implementation of linear derivation strategies

This study examines the efficacy of six linear derivation strategies: (i) s-linear resolution, (ii) the ME procedure; (iii) t-linear resolution, (iv) SL -resolution, (v) the GC procedure, and (vi) SLM. The analysis is focused on the different restrictions and operations employed in each derivation strategy. The selection function, restrictive ancestor resolution, compulsory ancestor resolution on literals having atoms which are or become identical, compulsory merging operations, reuse of truncated literals, spreading of FALSE literals, no-tautologies resection, no two non-B-literals having identical atoms restriction, and the use of semantic information to trim irrelevant derivations from the search tree are the major features found In these six derivation strategies. Detecting loops and minimizing irrelevant derivations are the identified weak points of SLM. Two variations of SLM are suggested to rectify these problems. The ME procedure, SL-resolution, the GC procedure, SLM and one of the suggested variations of SLM were implemented using the Arity/Prolog compiler to produce the ME -TP, SL-TP, GC-TP, SLM-TP and SLM5-TP theorem provers respectively. In addition to the original features of each derivation strategy, the following search strategies were included in the implementations : the modified consecutively bounded depth-first search unit preference strategy, set of support strategy, pure literal elimination, tautologous clause elimination, selection function based on the computed weight of a literal, and a match check. The extension operation used by each theorem prover was extended to include subsumed unit extension and paramodulation. The performance of each theorem prover was determined. Experimental results were obtained using twenty four selected problems. The performance was measured in terms of the memory use and the execution time. A comparison of results between the five theorem provers using the, ME-TP as the basis was done. The results show that none of the theorem provers, consistently perform better than the others. Two of the selected problems were not proved by SL-TP and one problem was not proved by SLM-TP due to memory problems. The ME-TP, GC-TP and SLM5-TP proved all the selected problems. In some problems, the ME-TP and GC-TP performed better than SLM5-TP. However, the ME-TP and GC-TP had difficulties in some problems in which SLM5-TP performed well

Studies in the completeness and efficiency of theorem-proving by resolution

Inference systems Τ and search strategies E for T are distinguished from proof procedures β = (T,E) The completeness of procedures is studied by studying separately the completeness of inference systems and of search strategies. Completeness proofs for resolution systems are obtained by the construction of semantic trees. These systems include minimal α-restricted binary resolution, minimal α-restricted M-clash resolution and maximal pseudo-clash resolution. Certain refinements of hyper-resolution systems with equality axioms are shown to be complete and equivalent to refinements of the pararmodulation method for dealing with equality. The completeness and efficiency of search strategies for theorem-proving problems is studied in sufficient generality to include the case of search strategies for path-search problems in graphs. The notion of theorem-proving problem is defined abstractly so as to be dual to that of and" or tree. Special attention is given to resolution problems and to search strategies which generate simpler before more complex proofs. For efficiency, a proof procedure (T,E) requires an efficient search strategy E as well as an inference system T which admits both simple proofs and relatively few redundant and irrelevant derivations. The theory of efficient proof procedures outlined here is applied to proving the increased efficiency of the usual method for deleting tautologies and subsumed clauses. Counter-examples are exhibited for both the completeness and efficiency of alternative methods for deleting subsumed clauses. The efficiency of resolution procedures is improved by replacing the single operation of resolving a clash by the two operations of generating factors of clauses and of resolving a clash of factors. Several factoring methods are investigated for completeness. Of these the m-factoring method is shown to be always more efficient than the Wos-Robinson method

Ein mehrsortiger Resolutionskalkül mit Paramodulation

Der Resolutionskalkül mit Paramodulationsregel wird zu einem mehrsortigen Kalkül erweitert. Als Grundlage für das automatische Beweisen erhält man mit diesem Kalkül einen stark reduzierten Suchraum und einfachere Beweise. Die Vollständigkeit, die Korrektheit und der Sortensatz, der den neuen Kalkül mit seinem einsortigen Gegenstück in Beziehung setzt, werden bewiesen. Ergebnisse über Grundtermersetzungen und Unifikation in einem mehrsortigen Kalkül werden vorgestellt. Die Implementierung eines automatischen Beweisers für den neuen Kalkül wird beschrieben. Die Vorteile der Methode werden anhand ausgewählter Beispiele belegt.The resolution calculus with paramodulationrule is extended to a many-sorted calculus. As a basis for Automated Theorem Proving, this many-sorted calculus leads to a remarkable reduction of the search space and also to simpler proofs. Soundness and completeness of the new calculus and the Sort-Theorem, which relates the many-sorted calculus to its one-sorted counterpart, are shown. In addition results about groundterm rewriting and unification in a many-sorted calculus are obtained. The practical consequences for an implementation of an automated theorem prover based on the many-sorted calculus are described. The advantages of the proposed method is verified by certain examples

Saturation-based decision procedures for extensions of the guarded fragment

We apply the framework of Bachmair and Ganzinger for saturation-based theorem proving to derive a range of decision procedures for logical formalisms, starting with a simple terminological language EL, which allows for conjunction and existential restrictions only, and ending with extensions of the guarded fragment with equality, constants, functionality, number restrictions and compositional axioms of form S ◦ T ⊆ H. Our procedures are derived in a uniform way using standard saturation-based calculi enhanced with simplification rules based on the general notion of redundancy. We argue that such decision procedures can be applied for reasoning in expressive description logics, where they have certain advantages over traditionally used tableau procedures, such as optimal worst-case complexity and direct correctness proofs.Wir wenden das Framework von Bachmair und Ganzinger für saturierungsbasiertes Theorembeweisen an, um eine Reihe von Entscheidungsverfahren für logische Formalismen abzuleiten, angefangen von einer simplen terminologischen Sprache EL, die nur Konjunktionen und existentielle Restriktionen erlaubt, bis zu Erweiterungen des Guarded Fragment mit Gleichheit, Konstanten, Funktionalität, Zahlenrestriktionen und Kompositionsaxiomen der Form S ◦ T ⊆ H. Unsere Verfahren sind einheitlich abgeleitet unter Benutzung herkömmlicher saturierungsbasierter Kalküle, verbessert durch Simplifikationsregeln, die auf dem Konzept der Redundanz basieren. Wir argumentieren, daß solche Entscheidungsprozeduren für das Beweisen in ausdrucksvollen Beschreibungslogiken angewendet werden können, wo sie gewisse Vorteile gegenüber traditionell benutzten Tableauverfahren besitzen, wie z.B. optimale worst-case Komplexität und direkte Korrektheitsbeweise