Model-based Safety and Security Co-analysis: a Survey

We survey the state-of-the-art on model-based formalisms for safety and security analysis, where safety refers to the absence of unintended failures, and security absence of malicious attacks. We consider ten model-based formalisms, comparing their modeling principles, the interaction between safety and security, and analysis methods. In each formalism, we model the classical Locked Door Example where possible. Our key finding is that the exact nature of safety-security interaction is still ill-understood. Existing formalisms merge previous safety and security formalisms, without introducing specific constructs to model safety-security interactions, or metrics to analyze trade offs

Algorithmic Obfuscation for LDPC Decoders

In order to protect intellectual property against untrusted foundry, many logic-locking schemes have been developed. The main idea of logic locking is to insert a key-controlled block into a circuit to make the circuit function incorrectly without right keys. However, in the case that the algorithm implemented by the circuit is naturally fault-tolerant or self-correcting, existing logic-locking schemes do not affect the system performance much even if wrong keys are used. One example is low-density parity-check (LDPC) error-correcting decoder, which has broad applications in digital communications and storage. This paper proposes two algorithmic-level obfuscation methods for LDPC decoders. By modifying the decoding process and locking the stopping criterion, our new designs substantially degrade the decoder throughput and/or error-correcting performance when the wrong key is used. Besides, our designs are also resistant to the SAT, AppSAT and removal attacks. For an example LDPC decoder, our proposed methods reduce the throughput to less than 1/3 and/or increase the decoder error rate by at least two orders of magnitude with only 0.33% area overhead