3,322 research outputs found
Completeness Results for Parameterized Space Classes
The parameterized complexity of a problem is considered "settled" once it has
been shown to lie in FPT or to be complete for a class in the W-hierarchy or a
similar parameterized hierarchy. Several natural parameterized problems have,
however, resisted such a classification. At least in some cases, the reason is
that upper and lower bounds for their parameterized space complexity have
recently been obtained that rule out completeness results for parameterized
time classes. In this paper, we make progress in this direction by proving that
the associative generability problem and the longest common subsequence problem
are complete for parameterized space classes. These classes are defined in
terms of different forms of bounded nondeterminism and in terms of simultaneous
time--space bounds. As a technical tool we introduce a "union operation" that
translates between problems complete for classical complexity classes and for
W-classes.Comment: IPEC 201
Finite Countermodel Based Verification for Program Transformation (A Case Study)
Both automatic program verification and program transformation are based on
program analysis. In the past decade a number of approaches using various
automatic general-purpose program transformation techniques (partial deduction,
specialization, supercompilation) for verification of unreachability properties
of computing systems were introduced and demonstrated. On the other hand, the
semantics based unfold-fold program transformation methods pose themselves
diverse kinds of reachability tasks and try to solve them, aiming at improving
the semantics tree of the program being transformed. That means some
general-purpose verification methods may be used for strengthening program
transformation techniques. This paper considers the question how finite
countermodels for safety verification method might be used in Turchin's
supercompilation method. We extract a number of supercompilation sub-algorithms
trying to solve reachability problems and demonstrate use of an external
countermodel finder for solving some of the problems.Comment: In Proceedings VPT 2015, arXiv:1512.0221
On the Complexity of ATL and ATL* Module Checking
Module checking has been introduced in late 1990s to verify open systems,
i.e., systems whose behavior depends on the continuous interaction with the
environment. Classically, module checking has been investigated with respect to
specifications given as CTL and CTL* formulas. Recently, it has been shown that
CTL (resp., CTL*) module checking offers a distinctly different perspective
from the better-known problem of ATL (resp., ATL*) model checking. In
particular, ATL (resp., ATL*) module checking strictly enhances the
expressiveness of both CTL (resp., CTL*) module checking and ATL (resp. ATL*)
model checking. In this paper, we provide asymptotically optimal bounds on the
computational cost of module checking against ATL and ATL*, whose upper bounds
are based on an automata-theoretic approach. We show that module-checking for
ATL is EXPTIME-complete, which is the same complexity of module checking
against CTL. On the other hand, ATL* module checking turns out to be
3EXPTIME-complete, hence exponentially harder than CTL* module checking.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2017, arXiv:1709.0176
Computations by fly-automata beyond monadic second-order logic
We present logically based methods for constructing XP and FPT graph
algorithms, parametrized by tree-width or clique-width. We will use
fly-automata introduced in a previous article. They make possible to check
properties that are not monadic second-order expressible because their states
may include counters, so that their sets of states may be infinite. We equip
these automata with output functions, so that they can compute values
associated with terms or graphs. Rather than new algorithmic results we present
tools for constructing easily certain dynamic programming algorithms by
combining predefined automata for basic functions and properties.Comment: Accepted for publication in Theoretical Computer Scienc
Liveness of Randomised Parameterised Systems under Arbitrary Schedulers (Technical Report)
We consider the problem of verifying liveness for systems with a finite, but
unbounded, number of processes, commonly known as parameterised systems.
Typical examples of such systems include distributed protocols (e.g. for the
dining philosopher problem). Unlike the case of verifying safety, proving
liveness is still considered extremely challenging, especially in the presence
of randomness in the system. In this paper we consider liveness under arbitrary
(including unfair) schedulers, which is often considered a desirable property
in the literature of self-stabilising systems. We introduce an automatic method
of proving liveness for randomised parameterised systems under arbitrary
schedulers. Viewing liveness as a two-player reachability game (between
Scheduler and Process), our method is a CEGAR approach that synthesises a
progress relation for Process that can be symbolically represented as a
finite-state automaton. The method is incremental and exploits both
Angluin-style L*-learning and SAT-solvers. Our experiments show that our
algorithm is able to prove liveness automatically for well-known randomised
distributed protocols, including Lehmann-Rabin Randomised Dining Philosopher
Protocol and randomised self-stabilising protocols (such as the Israeli-Jalfon
Protocol). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully-automatic
method that can prove liveness for randomised protocols.Comment: Full version of CAV'16 pape
Tight Upper Bounds for Streett and Parity Complementation
Complementation of finite automata on infinite words is not only a
fundamental problem in automata theory, but also serves as a cornerstone for
solving numerous decision problems in mathematical logic, model-checking,
program analysis and verification. For Streett complementation, a significant
gap exists between the current lower bound and upper
bound , where is the state size, is the number of
Streett pairs, and can be as large as . Determining the complexity
of Streett complementation has been an open question since the late '80s. In
this paper show a complementation construction with upper bound for and for ,
which matches well the lower bound obtained in \cite{CZ11a}. We also obtain a
tight upper bound for parity complementation.Comment: Corrected typos. 23 pages, 3 figures. To appear in the 20th
Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2011
- …