268 research outputs found
Fast Biclustering by Dual Parameterization
We study two clustering problems, Starforest Editing, the problem of adding
and deleting edges to obtain a disjoint union of stars, and the generalization
Bicluster Editing. We show that, in addition to being NP-hard, none of the
problems can be solved in subexponential time unless the exponential time
hypothesis fails.
Misra, Panolan, and Saurabh (MFCS 2013) argue that introducing a bound on the
number of connected components in the solution should not make the problem
easier: In particular, they argue that the subexponential time algorithm for
editing to a fixed number of clusters (p-Cluster Editing) by Fomin et al. (J.
Comput. Syst. Sci., 80(7) 2014) is an exception rather than the rule. Here, p
is a secondary parameter, bounding the number of components in the solution.
However, upon bounding the number of stars or bicliques in the solution, we
obtain algorithms which run in time for p-Starforest
Editing and for p-Bicluster Editing. We
obtain a similar result for the more general case of t-Partite p-Cluster
Editing. This is subexponential in k for fixed number of clusters, since p is
then considered a constant.
Our results even out the number of multivariate subexponential time
algorithms and give reasons to believe that this area warrants further study.Comment: Accepted for presentation at IPEC 201
From Gap-ETH to FPT-Inapproximability: Clique, Dominating Set, and More
We consider questions that arise from the intersection between the areas of
polynomial-time approximation algorithms, subexponential-time algorithms, and
fixed-parameter tractable algorithms. The questions, which have been asked
several times (e.g., [Marx08, FGMS12, DF13]), are whether there is a
non-trivial FPT-approximation algorithm for the Maximum Clique (Clique) and
Minimum Dominating Set (DomSet) problems parameterized by the size of the
optimal solution. In particular, letting be the optimum and be
the size of the input, is there an algorithm that runs in
time and outputs a solution of size
, for any functions and that are independent of (for
Clique, we want )?
In this paper, we show that both Clique and DomSet admit no non-trivial
FPT-approximation algorithm, i.e., there is no
-FPT-approximation algorithm for Clique and no
-FPT-approximation algorithm for DomSet, for any function
(e.g., this holds even if is the Ackermann function). In fact, our results
imply something even stronger: The best way to solve Clique and DomSet, even
approximately, is to essentially enumerate all possibilities. Our results hold
under the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH) [Dinur16, MR16], which
states that no -time algorithm can distinguish between a satisfiable
3SAT formula and one which is not even -satisfiable for some
constant .
Besides Clique and DomSet, we also rule out non-trivial FPT-approximation for
Maximum Balanced Biclique, Maximum Subgraphs with Hereditary Properties, and
Maximum Induced Matching in bipartite graphs. Additionally, we rule out
-FPT-approximation algorithm for Densest -Subgraph although this
ratio does not yet match the trivial -approximation algorithm.Comment: 43 pages. To appear in FOCS'1
Assessing the Computational Complexity of Multi-Layer Subgraph Detection
Multi-layer graphs consist of several graphs (layers) over the same vertex
set. They are motivated by real-world problems where entities (vertices) are
associated via multiple types of relationships (edges in different layers). We
chart the border of computational (in)tractability for the class of subgraph
detection problems on multi-layer graphs, including fundamental problems such
as maximum matching, finding certain clique relaxations (motivated by community
detection), or path problems. Mostly encountering hardness results, sometimes
even for two or three layers, we can also spot some islands of tractability
Mod/Resc Parsimony Inference
We address in this paper a new computational biology problem that aims at
understanding a mechanism that could potentially be used to genetically
manipulate natural insect populations infected by inherited, intra-cellular
parasitic bacteria. In this problem, that we denote by \textsc{Mod/Resc
Parsimony Inference}, we are given a boolean matrix and the goal is to find two
other boolean matrices with a minimum number of columns such that an
appropriately defined operation on these matrices gives back the input. We show
that this is formally equivalent to the \textsc{Bipartite Biclique Edge Cover}
problem and derive some complexity results for our problem using this
equivalence. We provide a new, fixed-parameter tractability approach for
solving both that slightly improves upon a previously published algorithm for
the \textsc{Bipartite Biclique Edge Cover}. Finally, we present experimental
results where we applied some of our techniques to a real-life data set.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figure
Reconfiguration on sparse graphs
A vertex-subset graph problem Q defines which subsets of the vertices of an
input graph are feasible solutions. A reconfiguration variant of a
vertex-subset problem asks, given two feasible solutions S and T of size k,
whether it is possible to transform S into T by a sequence of vertex additions
and deletions such that each intermediate set is also a feasible solution of
size bounded by k. We study reconfiguration variants of two classical
vertex-subset problems, namely Independent Set and Dominating Set. We denote
the former by ISR and the latter by DSR. Both ISR and DSR are PSPACE-complete
on graphs of bounded bandwidth and W[1]-hard parameterized by k on general
graphs. We show that ISR is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by k when
the input graph is of bounded degeneracy or nowhere-dense. As a corollary, we
answer positively an open question concerning the parameterized complexity of
the problem on graphs of bounded treewidth. Moreover, our techniques generalize
recent results showing that ISR is fixed-parameter tractable on planar graphs
and graphs of bounded degree. For DSR, we show the problem fixed-parameter
tractable parameterized by k when the input graph does not contain large
bicliques, a class of graphs which includes graphs of bounded degeneracy and
nowhere-dense graphs
- âŠ