Parameterized Study of the Test Cover Problem

We carry out a systematic study of a natural covering problem, used for identification across several areas, in the realm of parameterized complexity. In the {\sc Test Cover} problem we are given a set $[n]=\{1,...,n\}$ of items together with a collection, $\cal T$, of distinct subsets of these items called tests. We assume that $\cal T$ is a test cover, i.e., for each pair of items there is a test in $\cal T$ containing exactly one of these items. The objective is to find a minimum size subcollection of $\cal T$, which is still a test cover. The generic parameterized version of {\sc Test Cover} is denoted by $p(k,n,|{\cal T}|)$-{\sc Test Cover}. Here, we are given $([n],\cal{T})$ and a positive integer parameter $k$ as input and the objective is to decide whether there is a test cover of size at most $p(k,n,|{\cal T}|)$. We study four parameterizations for {\sc Test Cover} and obtain the following: (a) $k$-{\sc Test Cover}, and $(n-k)$-{\sc Test Cover} are fixed-parameter tractable (FPT). (b) $(|{\cal T}|-k)$-{\sc Test Cover} and $(\log n+k)$-{\sc Test Cover} are W[1]-hard. Thus, it is unlikely that these problems are FPT

Fast Parallel Fixed-Parameter Algorithms via Color Coding

Fixed-parameter algorithms have been successfully applied to solve numerous difficult problems within acceptable time bounds on large inputs. However, most fixed-parameter algorithms are inherently \emph{sequential} and, thus, make no use of the parallel hardware present in modern computers. We show that parallel fixed-parameter algorithms do not only exist for numerous parameterized problems from the literature -- including vertex cover, packing problems, cluster editing, cutting vertices, finding embeddings, or finding matchings -- but that there are parallel algorithms working in \emph{constant} time or at least in time \emph{depending only on the parameter} (and not on the size of the input) for these problems. Phrased in terms of complexity classes, we place numerous natural parameterized problems in parameterized versions of AC$^0$. On a more technical level, we show how the \emph{color coding} method can be implemented in constant time and apply it to embedding problems for graphs of bounded tree-width or tree-depth and to model checking first-order formulas in graphs of bounded degree

(Non-)existence of Polynomial Kernels for the Test Cover Problem

The input of the Test Cover problem consists of a set $V$ of vertices, and a collection ${\cal E}=\{E_1,..., E_m\}$ of distinct subsets of $V$, called tests. A test $E_q$ separates a pair $v_i,v_j$ of vertices if $|\{v_i,v_j\}\cap E_q|=1.$ A subcollection ${\cal T}\subseteq {\cal E}$ is a test cover if each pair $v_i,v_j$ of distinct vertices is separated by a test in ${\cal T}$. The objective is to find a test cover of minimum cardinality, if one exists. This problem is NP-hard. We consider two parameterizations the Test Cover problem with parameter $k$: (a) decide whether there is a test cover with at most $k$ tests, (b) decide whether there is a test cover with at most $|V|-k$ tests. Both parameterizations are known to be fixed-parameter tractable. We prove that none have a polynomial size kernel unless $NP\subseteq coNP/poly$. Our proofs use the cross-composition method recently introduced by Bodlaender et al. (2011) and parametric duality introduced by Chen et al. (2005). The result for the parameterization (a) was an open problem (private communications with Henning Fernau and Jiong Guo, Jan.-Feb. 2012). We also show that the parameterization (a) admits a polynomial size kernel if the size of each test is upper-bounded by a constant

Parameterization Above a Multiplicative Guarantee

Parameterization above a guarantee is a successful paradigm in Parameterized Complexity. To the best of our knowledge, all fixed-parameter tractable problems in this paradigm share an additive form defined as follows. Given an instance (I,k) of some (parameterized) problem ? with a guarantee g(I), decide whether I admits a solution of size at least (at most) k+g(I). Here, g(I) is usually a lower bound (resp. upper bound) on the maximum (resp. minimum) size of a solution. Since its introduction in 1999 for Max SAT and Max Cut (with g(I) being half the number of clauses and half the number of edges, respectively, in the input), analysis of parameterization above a guarantee has become a very active and fruitful topic of research. We highlight a multiplicative form of parameterization above a guarantee: Given an instance (I,k) of some (parameterized) problem ? with a guarantee g(I), decide whether I admits a solution of size at least (resp. at most) k ? g(I). In particular, we study the Long Cycle problem with a multiplicative parameterization above the girth g(I) of the input graph, and provide a parameterized algorithm for this problem. Apart from being of independent interest, this exemplifies how parameterization above a multiplicative guarantee can arise naturally. We also show that, for any fixed constant ?>0, multiplicative parameterization above g(I)^(1+?) of Long Cycle yields para-NP-hardness, thus our parameterization is tight in this sense. We complement our main result with the design (or refutation of the existence) of algorithms for other problems parameterized multiplicatively above girth