A comparison of statistical machine learning methods in heartbeat detection and classification

In health care, patients with heart problems require quick responsiveness in a clinical setting or in the operating theatre. Towards that end, automated classification of heartbeats is vital as some heartbeat irregularities are time consuming to detect. Therefore, analysis of electro-cardiogram (ECG) signals is an active area of research. The methods proposed in the literature depend on the structure of a heartbeat cycle. In this paper, we use interval and amplitude based features together with a few samples from the ECG signal as a feature vector. We studied a variety of classification algorithms focused especially on a type of arrhythmia known as the ventricular ectopic fibrillation (VEB). We compare the performance of the classifiers against algorithms proposed in the literature and make recommendations regarding features, sampling rate, and choice of the classifier to apply in a real-time clinical setting. The extensive study is based on the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. Our main contribution is the evaluation of existing classifiers over a range sampling rates, recommendation of a detection methodology to employ in a practical setting, and extend the notion of a mixture of experts to a larger class of algorithms

Asynchronous and Exact Forward Recovery for Detected Errors in Iterative Solvers

© 2018 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes,creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.Current trends and projections show that faults in computer systems become increasingly common. Such errors may be detected, and possibly corrected transparently, e.g. by Error Correcting Codes (ECC). For a program to be fault-tolerant, it needs to also handle the Errors that are Detected and Uncorrected (DUE), such as an ECC encountering too many bit flips in a codeword. While correcting an error has an overhead in itself, it can also affect the progress of a program. The most generic technique, rolling back the program state to a previously taken checkpoint, sets back any progress done since then. Alternately, application specific techniques exist, such as restarting an iterative program with its latest iteration's values as initial guess.This manuscript is the journal extension of a previously published conference paper [25]. This work has been partially supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s 7th FP, ERC Advanced Grant 321253, and by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under grant TIN2015-65316-P. L. Jaulmes has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports under grant FPU2013/06982. M. Moretó has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under Juan de la Cierva postdoctoral fellowship JCI-2012-15047. M. Casas has been partially supported by the Secretary for Universities and Research of the Ministry of Economy and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia and the Co-fund programme of the Marie Curie Actions of the European Union’s 7th FP (contract 2013 BP B 00243). We would like to thank Nicolas Vidal for his contribution on using huge pages natively.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft