GPU-Accelerated BWT Construction for Large Collection of Short Reads

Advances in DNA sequencing technology have stimulated the development of algorithms and tools for processing very large collections of short strings (reads). Short-read alignment and assembly are among the most well-studied problems. Many state-of-the-art aligners, at their core, have used the Burrows-Wheeler transform (BWT) as a main-memory index of a reference genome (typical example, NCBI human genome). Recently, BWT has also found its use in string-graph assembly, for indexing the reads (i.e., raw data from DNA sequencers). In a typical data set, the volume of reads is tens of times of the sequenced genome and can be up to 100 Gigabases. Note that a reference genome is relatively stable and computing the index is not a frequent task. For reads, the index has to computed from scratch for each given input. The ability of efficient BWT construction becomes a much bigger concern than before. In this paper, we present a practical method called CX1 for constructing the BWT of very large string collections. CX1 is the first tool that can take advantage of the parallelism given by a graphics processing unit (GPU, a relative cheap device providing a thousand or more primitive cores), as well as simultaneously the parallelism from a multi-core CPU and more interestingly, from a cluster of GPU-enabled nodes. Using CX1, the BWT of a short-read collection of up to 100 Gigabases can be constructed in less than 2 hours using a machine equipped with a quad-core CPU and a GPU, or in about 43 minutes using a cluster with 4 such machines (the speedup is almost linear after excluding the first 16 minutes for loading the reads from the hard disk). The previously fastest tool BRC is measured to take 12 hours to process 100 Gigabases on one machine; it is non-trivial how BRC can be parallelized to take advantage a cluster of machines, let alone GPUs.Comment: 11 page

On Longest Repeat Queries Using GPU

Repeat finding in strings has important applications in subfields such as computational biology. The challenge of finding the longest repeats covering particular string positions was recently proposed and solved by \.{I}leri et al., using a total of the optimal $O(n)$ time and space, where $n$ is the string size. However, their solution can only find the \emph{leftmost} longest repeat for each of the $n$ string position. It is also not known how to parallelize their solution. In this paper, we propose a new solution for longest repeat finding, which although is theoretically suboptimal in time but is conceptually simpler and works faster and uses less memory space in practice than the optimal solution. Further, our solution can find \emph{all} longest repeats of every string position, while still maintaining a faster processing speed and less memory space usage. Moreover, our solution is \emph{parallelizable} in the shared memory architecture (SMA), enabling it to take advantage of the modern multi-processor computing platforms such as the general-purpose graphics processing units (GPU). We have implemented both the sequential and parallel versions of our solution. Experiments with both biological and non-biological data show that our sequential and parallel solutions are faster than the optimal solution by a factor of 2--3.5 and 6--14, respectively, and use less memory space.Comment: 14 page

The Parallelism Motifs of Genomic Data Analysis

Genomic data sets are growing dramatically as the cost of sequencing continues to decline and small sequencing devices become available. Enormous community databases store and share this data with the research community, but some of these genomic data analysis problems require large scale computational platforms to meet both the memory and computational requirements. These applications differ from scientific simulations that dominate the workload on high end parallel systems today and place different requirements on programming support, software libraries, and parallel architectural design. For example, they involve irregular communication patterns such as asynchronous updates to shared data structures. We consider several problems in high performance genomics analysis, including alignment, profiling, clustering, and assembly for both single genomes and metagenomes. We identify some of the common computational patterns or motifs that help inform parallelization strategies and compare our motifs to some of the established lists, arguing that at least two key patterns, sorting and hashing, are missing