ImageCLEF 2013: The vision, the data and the open challenges

This paper presents an overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 lab. Since its first edition in 2003, ImageCLEF has become one of the key initiatives promoting the benchmark evaluation of algorithms for the cross-language annotation and retrieval of images in various domains, such as public and personal images, to data acquired by mobile robot platforms and botanic collections. Over the years, by providing new data collections and challenging tasks to the community of interest, the ImageCLEF lab has achieved an unique position in the multi lingual image annotation and retrieval research landscape. The 2013 edition consisted of three tasks: the photo annotation and retrieval task, the plant identification task and the robot vision task. Furthermore, the medical annotation task, that traditionally has been under the ImageCLEF umbrella and that this year celebrates its tenth anniversary, has been organized in conjunction with AMIA for the first time. The paper describes the tasks and the 2013 competition, giving an unifying perspective of the present activities of the lab while discussion the future challenges and opportunities.This work has been partially supported by the Halser Foundation (B. C.),by the LiMoSINe FP7 project under grant # 288024 (B. T.), by the Khresmoi (grant# 257528) and PROMISE ( grant # 258191) FP 7 projects (H.M.) and by the tranScriptorium FP7 project under grant # 600707 (M. V., R. P.)Caputo ., B.; Muller ., H.; Thomee ., B.; Villegas, M.; Paredes Palacios, R.; Zellhofer ., D.; Goeau ., H.... (2013). ImageCLEF 2013: The vision, the data and the open challenges. En Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Visualization. Springer Verlag (Germany). 8138:250-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1_26S2502688138Muller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B.: ImageCLEF: experimental evaluation in visual information retrieval. Springer (2010)Tsikrika, T., Seco de Herrera, A.G., Müller, H.: Assessing the scholarly impact of imageCLEF. In: Forner, P., Gonzalo, J., Kekäläinen, J., Lalmas, M., de Rijke, M. (eds.) CLEF 2011. LNCS, vol. 6941, pp. 95–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Huiskes, M., Lew, M.: The MIR Flickr retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 39–43 (2008)Huiskes, M., Thomee, B., Lew, M.: New trends and ideas in visual concept detection. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 527–536 (2010)Villegas, M., Paredes, R.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2012 Scalable Web Image Annotation Task. In: CLEF 2012 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Rome, Italy (2012)Zellhöfer, D.: Overview of the Personal Photo Retrieval Pilot Task at ImageCLEF 2012. In: CLEF 2012 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Rome, Italy (2012)Villegas, M., Paredes, R., Thomee, B.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 Scalable Concept Image Annotation Subtask. In: CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Valencia, Spain (2013)Zellhöfer, D.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 Personal Photo Retrieval Subtask. In: CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Valencia, Spain (2013)Leafsnap (2011)Plantnet (2013)Mobile flora (2013)Folia (2012)Goëau, H., Bonnet, P., Joly, A., Bakic, V., Boujemaa, N., Barthelemy, D., Molino, J.F.: The imageclef 2013 plant identification task. In: ImageCLEF 2013 Working Notes (2013)Pronobis, A., Xing, L., Caputo, B.: Overview of the CLEF 2009 robot vision track. In: Peters, C., Caputo, B., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Tsikrika, T. (eds.) CLEF 2009. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 110–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Pronobis, A., Caputo, B.: The robot vision task. In: Muller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B. (eds.) ImageCLEF. The Information Retrieval Series, vol. 32, pp. 185–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Pronobis, A., Christensen, H.I., Caputo, B.: Overview of the imageCLEF@ICPR 2010 robot vision track. In: Ünay, D., Çataltepe, Z., Aksoy, S. (eds.) ICPR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6388, pp. 171–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Martinez-Gomez, J., Garcia-Varea, I., Caputo, B.: Overview of the imageclef 2012 robot vision task. In: CLEF 2012 Working Notes (2012)Rusu, R., Cousins, S.: 3d is here: Point cloud library (pcl). In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2011)Bosch, A., Zisserman, A., Munoz, X.: Image classification using random forests and ferns. In: International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1–8. Citeseer (2007)Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2005, vol. 1, pp. 886–893. IEEE (2005)Linde, O., Lindeberg, T.: Object recognition using composed receptive field histograms of higher dimensionality. In: Proc. ICPR. Citeseer (2004)Orabona, F., Castellini, C., Caputo, B., Luo, J., Sandini, G.: Indoor place recognition using online independent support vector machines. In: Proc. BMVC, vol. 7 (2007)Orabona, F., Castellini, C., Caputo, B., Jie, L., Sandini, G.: On-line independent support vector machines. Pattern Recognition 43, 1402–1412 (2010)Orabona, F., Jie, L., Caputo, B.: Online-Batch Strongly Convex Multi Kernel Learning. In: Proc. of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR (2010)Orabona, F., Jie, L., Caputo, B.: Multi kernel learning with online-batch optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13, 165–191 (2012)Clough, P., Müller, H., Sanderson, M.: The CLEF 2004 cross-language image retrieval track. In: Peters, C., Clough, P., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kluck, M., Magnini, B. (eds.) CLEF 2004. LNCS, vol. 3491, pp. 597–613. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Clough, P., Müller, H., Deselaers, T., Grubinger, M., Lehmann, T.M., Jensen, J., Hersh, W.: The CLEF 2005 cross–language image retrieval track. In: Peters, C., Gey, F.C., Gonzalo, J., Müller, H., Jones, G.J.F., Kluck, M., Magnini, B., de Rijke, M., Giampiccolo, D. (eds.) CLEF 2005. LNCS, vol. 4022, pp. 535–557. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Müller, H., Deselaers, T., Deserno, T., Clough, P., Kim, E., Hersh, W.: Overview of the imageCLEFmed 2006 medical retrieval and medical annotation tasks. In: Peters, C., Clough, P., Gey, F.C., Karlgren, J., Magnini, B., Oard, D.W., de Rijke, M., Stempfhuber, M. (eds.) CLEF 2006. LNCS, vol. 4730, pp. 595–608. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Müller, H., Deselaers, T., Deserno, T., Kalpathy–Cramer, J., Kim, E., Hersh, W.: Overview of the imageCLEFmed 2007 medical retrieval and medical annotation tasks. In: Peters, C., Jijkoun, V., Mandl, T., Müller, H., Oard, D.W., Peñas, A., Petras, V., Santos, D. (eds.) CLEF 2007. LNCS, vol. 5152, pp. 472–491. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Müller, H., Kalpathy–Cramer, J., Eggel, I., Bedrick, S., Radhouani, S., Bakke, B., Kahn Jr., C.E., Hersh, W.: Overview of the CLEF 2009 medical image retrieval track. In: Peters, C., Caputo, B., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Tsikrika, T. (eds.) CLEF 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 72–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Tommasi, T., Caputo, B., Welter, P., Güld, M.O., Deserno, T.M.: Overview of the CLEF 2009 medical image annotation track. In: Peters, C., Caputo, B., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Tsikrika, T. (eds.) CLEF 2009. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 85–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Müller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B. (eds.): ImageCLEF – Experimental Evaluation in Visual Information Retrieval. The Springer International Series on Information Retrieval, vol. 32. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Bedrick, S., Eggel, I., García Seco de Herrera, A., Tsikrika, T.: The CLEF 2011 medical image retrieval and classification tasks. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2011 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) (2011)Müller, H., García Seco de Herrera, A., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Demner Fushman, D., Antani, S., Eggel, I.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2012 medical image retrieval and classification tasks. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2012 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) (2012)García Seco de Herrera, A., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Demner Fushman, D., Antani, S., Müller, H.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 medical tasks. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2013 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) (2013

Use Case Oriented Medical Visual Information Retrieval & System Evaluation

Large amounts of medical visual data are produced daily in hospitals, while new imaging techniques continue to emerge. In addition, many images are made available continuously via publications in the scientific literature and can also be valuable for clinical routine, research and education. Information retrieval systems are useful tools to provide access to the biomedical literature and fulfil the information needs of medical professionals. The tools developed in this thesis can potentially help clinicians make decisions about difficult diagnoses via a case-based retrieval system based on a use case associated with a specific evaluation task. This system retrieves articles from the biomedical literature when querying with a case description and attached images. This thesis proposes a multimodal approach for medical case-based retrieval with focus on the integration of visual information connected to text. Furthermore, the ImageCLEFmed evaluation campaign was organised during this thesis promoting medical retrieval system evaluation

Overview of the 2005 cross-language image retrieval track (ImageCLEF)

The purpose of this paper is to outline efforts from the 2005 CLEF crosslanguage image retrieval campaign (ImageCLEF). The aim of this CLEF track is to explore the use of both text and content-based retrieval methods for cross-language image retrieval. Four tasks were offered in the ImageCLEF track: a ad-hoc retrieval from an historic photographic collection, ad-hoc retrieval from a medical collection, an automatic image annotation task, and a user-centered (interactive) evaluation task that is explained in the iCLEF summary. 24 research groups from a variety of backgrounds and nationalities (14 countries) participated in ImageCLEF. In this paper we describe the ImageCLEF tasks, submissions from participating groups and summarise the main fndings

Automatic annotation of X-ray images: a study on attribute selection

Advances in the medical imaging technology has lead to an exponential growth in the number of digital images that need to be acquired, analyzed, classified, stored and retrieved in medical centers. As a result, medical image classification and retrieval has recently gained high interest in the scientific community. Despite several attempts, the proposed solutions are still far from being sufficiently accurate for real-life implementations. In a previous work, performance of different feature types were investigated in a SVM-based learning framework for classification. of X-Ray images into classes corresponding to body parts and local binary patterns were observed to outperform others. In this paper, we extend that work by exploring the effect of attribute selection on the classification performance. Our experiments show that principal component analysis based attribute selection manifests prediction values that are comparable to the baseline (all-features case) with considerably smaller subsets of original features, inducing lower processing times and reduced storage space

The medGIFT Group in ImageCLEFmed 2013

This article presents the participation of the medGIFT groupin ImageCLEFmed 2013. Since 2004, the group has participated in themedical image retrieval tasks of ImageCLEF each year. There are fourtypes of tasks for ImageCLEFmed 2013: modality classi cation, image{based retrieval, case{based retrieval and a new task on compound gureseparation. The medGIFT group participated in all four tasks. MedGIFTis developing a system named ParaDISE (Parallel Distributed ImageSearch Engine), which is the successor of GIFT (GNU Image FindingTool). The alpha version of ParaDISE was used to run the experimentsin the competition. The focus was on the use of multiple features incombinations with novel strategies, i.e, compound gure separation formodality classi cation or modality ltering for ad{hoc image and case{based retrieval

Convolutional Sparse Kernel Network for Unsupervised Medical Image Analysis

The availability of large-scale annotated image datasets and recent advances in supervised deep learning methods enable the end-to-end derivation of representative image features that can impact a variety of image analysis problems. Such supervised approaches, however, are difficult to implement in the medical domain where large volumes of labelled data are difficult to obtain due to the complexity of manual annotation and inter- and intra-observer variability in label assignment. We propose a new convolutional sparse kernel network (CSKN), which is a hierarchical unsupervised feature learning framework that addresses the challenge of learning representative visual features in medical image analysis domains where there is a lack of annotated training data. Our framework has three contributions: (i) We extend kernel learning to identify and represent invariant features across image sub-patches in an unsupervised manner. (ii) We initialise our kernel learning with a layer-wise pre-training scheme that leverages the sparsity inherent in medical images to extract initial discriminative features. (iii) We adapt a multi-scale spatial pyramid pooling (SPP) framework to capture subtle geometric differences between learned visual features. We evaluated our framework in medical image retrieval and classification on three public datasets. Our results show that our CSKN had better accuracy when compared to other conventional unsupervised methods and comparable accuracy to methods that used state-of-the-art supervised convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Our findings indicate that our unsupervised CSKN provides an opportunity to leverage unannotated big data in medical imaging repositories.Comment: Accepted by Medical Image Analysis (with a new title 'Convolutional Sparse Kernel Network for Unsupervised Medical Image Analysis'). The manuscript is available from following link (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.06.005

Medical image retrieval and automatic annotation: VPA-SABANCI at ImageCLEF 2009

Advances in the medical imaging technology has lead to an exponential growth in the number of digital images that needs to be acquired, analyzed, classified, stored and retrieved in medical centers. As a result, medical image classification and retrieval has recently gained high interest in the scientific community. Despite several attempts, such as the yearly-held ImageCLEF Medical Image Annotation Competition, the proposed solutions are still far from being su±ciently accurate for real-life implementations. In this paper we summarize the technical details of our experiments for the ImageCLEF 2009 medical image annotation task. We use a direct and two hierarchical classification schemes that employ support vector machines and local binary patterns, which are recently developed low-cost texture descriptors. The direct scheme employs a single SVM to automatically annotate X-ray images. The two proposed hierarchi-cal schemes divide the classification task into sub-problems. The first hierarchical scheme exploits ensemble SVMs trained on IRMA sub-codes. The second learns from subgroups of data defined by frequency of classes. Our experiments show that hier-archical annotation of images by training individual SVMs over each IRMA sub-code dominates its rivals in annotation accuracy with increased process time relative to the direct scheme

Evaluating performance of biomedical image retrieval systems - an overview of the medical image retrieval task at ImageCLEF 2004-2013

Medical image retrieval and classification have been extremely active research topics over the past 15 years. Within the ImageCLEF benchmark in medical image retrieval and classification, a standard test bed was created that allows researchers to compare their approaches and ideas on increasingly large and varied data sets including generated ground truth. This article describes the lessons learned in ten evaluation campaigns. A detailed analysis of the data also highlights the value of the resources created

Comparing Fusion Techniques for the ImageCLEF 2013 Medical Case Retrieval Task

Retrieval systems can supply similar cases with a proven diagnosis to a new example case under observation to help clinicians during their work. The ImageCLEFmed evaluation campaign proposes a framework where research groups can compare case-based retrieval approaches. This paper focuses on the case-based task and adds results of the compound figure separation and modality classification tasks. Several fusion approaches are compared to identify the approaches best adapted to the heterogeneous data of the task. Fusion of visual and textual features is analyzed, demonstrating that the selection of the fusion strategy can improve the best performance on the case-based retrieval task

Semi–Supervised Learning for Image Modality Classification

Searching for medical image content is a regular task for many physicians, especially in radiology. Retrieval of medical images from the scientific literature can benefit from automatic modality classification to focus the search and filter out non–relevant items. Training datasets are often unevenly distributed regarding the classes resulting sometimes in a less than optimal classification performance. This article proposes a semi–supervised learning approach applied using a k–Nearest Neighbour (k–NN) classifier to exploit unlabelled data and to expand the training set. The algorithmic implementation is described and the method is evaluated on the ImageCLEFmed modality classification benchmark. Results show that this approach achieves an improved performance over supervised k–NN and Random Forest classifiers. Moreover, medical case–based retrieval benefits from the modality filter