21,582 research outputs found

    Autonomous functionalities for cognitive radio

    Get PDF
    This paper provides an overview on the research activities in autonomous functionalities for cognitive radio and networks, carried out in FP7/E3-project. The identified main research areas within this topic include opportunistic spectrum access and autonomous self-x functionalities for communication nodes. Opportunistic spectrum access delineates innovative topics concerning distributed cooperative spectrum sensing, collaborative MAC algorithms, distributed radio resource management algorithms, and control mechanisms for the opportunistic spectrum access. In autonomous self-x functionalities the research covers cognitive device management, autonomous RAT and operator selection and self-x features for autonomous elements, including autonomous decision making functionalities for RAT protocol configuration, negotiation on missing RAT protocol components, and functionality for dynamic configuration of RAT protocol components.Postprint (published version

    A Survey on Spectrum Management in Cognitive Radio Networks

    Get PDF
    Cognitive radio networks will provide high bandwidth to mobile users via heterogeneous wireless architectures and dynamic spectrum access techniques. However, CR networks impose challenges due to the fluctuating nature of the available spectrum, as well as the diverse QoS requirements of various applications. Spectrum management functions can address these challenges for the realization of this new network paradigm. To provide a better understanding of CR networks, this article presents recent developments and open research issues in spectrum management in CR networks. More specifically, the discussion is focused on the development of CR networks that require no modification of existing networks. First, a brief overview of cognitive radio and the CR network architecture is provided. Then four main challenges of spectrum management are discussed: spectrum sensing, spectrum decision, spectrum sharing, and spectrum mobility

    Two stage spectrum sensing for cognitive radio

    Get PDF
    In past few decades the need for high data rate wireless communication has experienced a booming growth indicating a huge commercial potential. The growing demand of wireless devices is restricted by the spectrum access policy of radio regulatory regime. The commercial success of the unlicensed spectrum has encouraged FCC to frame policies towards more flexible and open spectrum access. Cognitive radio has emerged as a solution to the problem of low spectral occupancy and inefficient utilization of the licensed radio spectrum. It identifies the unused portions of the licensed spectrum known as spectrum holes and makes them available for unlicensed or secondary users. Spectrum sensing, an important part of cognitive radio sense the surrounding radio environment and determines the presence or absence of the licensed user in the licensed band. It helps to get an overview on the radio environment usage and in determining the spectrum holes. The two-stage spectrum sensing method utilizes the strength of both energy and cyclostationary schemes. In this the received signal first passes through the energy detection. If the signal is not detected in this stage it goes to the cyclostationary detection stage. It was observed that the two-stage spectrum sensing method outperforms both the energy detection and cyclostationary detection method. In this dissertation, two-stage detection scheme detects the presence of wireless microphone signals and a modified detection method for cyclostationary is proposed. The simulation results verify this

    On Random Sampling for Compliance Monitoring in Opportunistic Spectrum Access Networks

    Get PDF
    In the expanding spectrum marketplace, there has been a long term evolution towards more market€“oriented mechanisms, such as Opportunistic Spectrum Access (OSA), enabled through Cognitive Radio (CR) technology. However, the potential of CR technologies to revolutionize wireless communications, also introduces challenges based upon the potentially non€“deterministic CR behaviour in the Electrospace. While establishing and enforcing compliance to spectrum etiquette rules are essential to realization of successful OSA networks in the future, there has only been recent increased research activity into enforcement. This dissertation presents novel work on the spectrum monitoring aspect, which is crucial to effective enforcement of OSA. An overview of the challenges faced by current compliance monitoring methods is first presented. A framework is then proposed for the use of random spectral sampling techniques to reduce data collection complexity in wideband sensing scenarios. This approach is recommended as an alternative to Compressed Sensing (CS) techniques for wideband spectral occupancy estimation, which may be difficult to utilize in many practical congested scenarios where compliance monitoring is required. Next, a low€“cost computational approach to online randomized temporal sensing deployment is presented for characterization of temporal spectrum occupancy in cognitive radio scenarios. The random sensing approach is demonstrated and its performance is compared to CS€“based approach for occupancy estimation. A novel frame€“based sampling inversion technique is then presented for cases when it is necessary to track the temporal behaviour of individual CRs or CR networks. Parameters from randomly sampled Physical Layer Convergence Protocol (PLCP) data frames are used to reconstruct occupancy statistics, taking account of missed frames due to sampling design, sensor limitations and frame errors. Finally, investigations into the use of distributed and mobile spectrum sensing to collect spatial diversity to improve the above techniques are presented, for several common monitoring tasks in spectrum enforcement. Specifically, focus is upon techniques for achieving consensus in dynamic topologies such as in mobile sensing scenarios

    Superallocation and Cluster‐Based Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in 5G Cognitive Radio Network

    Get PDF
    Consequently, the research and development for the 5G systems have already been started. This chapter presents an overview of potential system network architecture and highlights a superallocation technique that could be employed in the 5G cognitive radio network (CRN). A superallocation scheme is proposed to enhance the sensing detection performance by rescheduling the sensing and reporting time slots in the 5G cognitive radio network with a cluster‐based cooperative spectrum sensing (CCSS). In the 4G CCSS scheme, first, all secondary users (SUs) detect the primary user (PU) signal during a rigid sensing time slot to check the availability of the spectrum band. Second, during the SU reporting time slot, the sensing results from the SUs are reported to the corresponding cluster heads (CHs). Finally, during CH reporting time slots, the CHs forward their hard decision to a fusion center (FC) through the common control channels for the global decision. However, the reporting time slots for the SUs and CHs do not contribute to the detection performance. In this chapter, a superallocation scheme that merges the reporting time slots of SUs and CHs by rescheduling the reporting time slots as a nonfixed sensing time slot for SUs to detect the PU signal promptly and more accurately is proposed. In this regard, SUs in each cluster can obtain a nonfixed sensing time slot depending on their reporting time slot order. The effectiveness of the proposed chapter that can achieve better detection performance under –28 to –10 dB environments and thus reduce reporting overhead is shown through simulations

    Joint Optimization of Detection Threshold and Resource Allocation in Infrastructure-based Multi-band Cognitive Radio Networks

    Get PDF
    [EN] Consider an infrastructure-based multi-band cognitive radio network (CRN) where secondary users (SUs) opportunistically access a set of sub-carriers when sensed as idle. The carrier sensing threshold which affects the access opportunities of SUs is conventionally regarded as static and treated independently from the resource allocation in the model. In this article, we study jointly the optimization of detection threshold and resource allocation with the goal of maximizing the total downlink capacity of SUs in such CRNs. The optimization problem is formulated considering three sets of variables, i.e., detection threshold, sub-carrier assignment and power allocation, with constraints on the PUs¿ rate loss and the power budget of the CR base station. Two schemes, referred to as offline and online algorithms respectively, are proposed to solve the optimization problem. While the offline algorithm finds the global optimal solution with high complexity, the online algorithm provides a close-to-optimal solution with much lower complexity and realtime capability. The performance of the proposed schemes is evaluated by extensive simulations and compared with the conventional static threshold selection algorithm specified in the IEEE 802.22 standard.This work is supported by the EU FP7 S2EuNet project (247083), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSF61121001), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET) and the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science under project (TIN2008-06739-C04-02).Shi, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhang, P.; Martínez Bauset, J.; Li, FY. (2012). Joint Optimization of Detection Threshold and Resource Allocation in Infrastructure-based Multi-band Cognitive Radio Networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. 2012(334):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2012-334S1162012334Wang B, Liu K: Advances in cognitive radio networks: a survey. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process 2011, 5: 5-23.Akyildiz I, Lee W, Vuran M, Mohanty S: Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: a survey. Comput. Netw. 2006, 50(13):2127-2159. 10.1016/j.comnet.2006.05.001Haykin S: Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun 2005, 23(2):201-220.Zhao Q, Sadler B: A survey of dynamic spectrum access. IEEE Signal Process. Mag 2007, 24(3):79-89.Nguyen M, Lee H: Effective scheduling in infrastructure-based cognitive radio network. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput 2011, 10(6):853-867.Almalfouh S, Stuber G: Interference-aware radio resource allocation in OFDMA-based cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol 2011, 60(4):1699-1713.Kang X, Liang Y, Nallanathan A, Garg H, Zhang R: Optimal power allocation for fading channels in cognitive radio networks: ergodic capacity and outage capacity. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun 2009, 8(2):940-950.Bansal G, Hossain M, Bhargava V: Optimal and suboptimal power allocation schemes for OFDM-based cognitive radio systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun 2008, 7(11):4710-4718.Yucek T, Arslan H: A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor 2009, 11: 116-130.Cordeiro C, Ghosh M, Cavalcanti D, Challapali K: Spectrum sensing for dynamic spectrum access of TV bands. In Proceedings of the 2nd Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CrownCom’07). (Orlando, FL, USA, 1–3 Aug 2007);Chong J, Sung D, Sung Y: Cross-layer performance analysis for CSMA/CA protocols: impact of imperfect sensing. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol 2010, 59(3):1100-1108.Seol D, Lim H, Im G: Cooperative spectrum sensing with dynamic threshold adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM’09). Honolulu, HI, USA; 1.Liang Y, Zeng Y, Peh E, Hoang A: Sensing-throughput tradeoff for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun 2008, 7(4):1326-1337.Kang X, Liang Y, Garg H, Zhang L: Sensing-based spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol 2009, 58(8):4649-4654.Choi H, Jang K, Cheong Y: Adaptive sensing threshold control based on transmission power in cognitive radio systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CrownCom’08). (Singapore, 15–17 May 2008), pp.1–6Gorcin A, Qaraqe K, Celebi H, Arslan H: An adaptive threshold method for spectrum sensing in multi-channel cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT’10). Doha, Qatar; 4.Foukalas F, Mathiopoulos P, Karetsos G: Joint optimal power allocation and sensing threshold selection for SU’s capacity maximisation in SS CRN. Electron. Lett 2010, 46(20):1406-1407. 10.1049/el.2010.1355Jia P, Vu M, Le-Ngoc T, Hong S, Tarokh V: Capacity-and bayesian-based cognitive sensing with location side information. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun 2011, 29(2):276-289.Wang R, Lau V, Lv L, Chen B: Joint cross-layer scheduling and spectrum sensing for OFDMA cognitive radio systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun 2009, 8(5):2410-2416.Kang X, Garg H, Liang Y, Zhang R: Optimal power allocation for OFDM-based cognitive radio with new primary transmission protection criteria. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun 2010, 9(6):2066-2075.Quan Z, Cui S, Sayed A, Poor H: Optimal multiband joint detection for spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Process 2009, 57(3):1128-1140.López-Benítez M, Casadevall F: An overview of spectrum occupancy models for cognitive radio networks. In International IFIP TC 6 Workshops: PE-CRN, NC-Pro, WCNS , and SUNSET. Valencia, Spain; 13 May 2011.Pla V, Vidal J, Martinez-Bause J, Guijarro L: Modeling and characterization of spectrum white spaces for underlay cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’10). Cape Town, South Africa; 23.Yu W, Lui R: Dual methods for nonconvex spectrum optimization of multicarrier systems. IEEE Trans. Commun 2006, 54(7):1310-1322.Boyd S, Vandenberghe L: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2004.Jang J, Lee K: Transmit power adaptation for multiuser OFDM systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun 2003, 21(2):171-178. 10.1109/JSAC.2002.807348Luenberger D, Ye Y: Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Springer Verlag, Stanford; 2008.Barbarossa S, Sardellitti S, Scutari G: Joint optimization of detection thresholds and power allocation for opportunistic access in multicarrier cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP’09). Aruba, Netherlands; 13

    PERFORMANCE OF LINEAR DECISION COMBINER FOR PRIMARY USER DETECTION IN COGNITIVE RADIO

    Get PDF
    The successful implementation and employment of various cognitive radio services are largely dependent on the spectrum sensing performance of the cognitive radio terminals. Previous works on detection of cognitive radio have suggested the necessity of user cooperation in order to be able to detect at low signal-to-noise ratios experienced in practical situations. This report provides a brief overview of the impact of different fusion strategies on the spectrum hole detection performance of a fusion center in a distributed detection environment. Different decision or detection rule and fusion strategies, like single sensor scenario, counting rule, and linear decision metric, were used to analyze their influence on the spectrum sensing performance of the cognitive radio network. We consider a system of cognitive radio users who cooperate with each other in trying to detect licensed transmissions. Assuming that the cooperating nodes use identical energy detectors, we model the received signals as correlated log-normal random variables and study the problem of fusing the decisions made by the individual nodes. The cooperating radios were assumed to be designed in such a way that they satisfy the interference probability constraint individually. The interference probability constraint was also met at the fusion center. The simulation results strongly suggests that even when the observations at the individual sensors are moderately correlated, it is important not to ignore the correlation between the nodes for fusing the local decisions made by the secondary users. The thesis mainly focuses on the performance measurement of linear decision combiner in detecting primary users in a cognitive radio network
    corecore