52 research outputs found

    Minor-Obstructions for Apex-Pseudoforests

    Full text link
    A graph is called a pseudoforest if none of its connected components contains more than one cycle. A graph is an apex-pseudoforest if it can become a pseudoforest by removing one of its vertices. We identify 33 graphs that form the minor-obstruction set of the class of apex-pseudoforests, i.e., the set of all minor-minimal graphs that are not apex-pseudoforests

    Preprocessing for Outerplanar Vertex Deletion: An Elementary Kernel of Quartic Size

    Get PDF
    In the ?-Minor-Free Deletion problem one is given an undirected graph G, an integer k, and the task is to determine whether there exists a vertex set S of size at most k, so that G-S contains no graph from the finite family ? as a minor. It is known that whenever ? contains at least one planar graph, then ?-Minor-Free Deletion admits a polynomial kernel, that is, there is a polynomial-time algorithm that outputs an equivalent instance of size k^{?(1)} [Fomin, Lokshtanov, Misra, Saurabh; FOCS 2012]. However, this result relies on non-constructive arguments based on well-quasi-ordering and does not provide a concrete bound on the kernel size. We study the Outerplanar Deletion problem, in which we want to remove at most k vertices from a graph to make it outerplanar. This is a special case of ?-Minor-Free Deletion for the family ? = {K?, K_{2,3}}. The class of outerplanar graphs is arguably the simplest class of graphs for which no explicit kernelization size bounds are known. By exploiting the combinatorial properties of outerplanar graphs we present elementary reduction rules decreasing the size of a graph. This yields a constructive kernel with ?(k?) vertices and edges. As a corollary, we derive that any minor-minimal obstruction to having an outerplanar deletion set of size k has ?(k?) vertices and edges

    On Directed Feedback Vertex Set parameterized by treewidth

    Get PDF
    We study the Directed Feedback Vertex Set problem parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph. We prove that unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, the problem cannot be solved in time 2o(tlogt)nO(1)2^{o(t\log t)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)} on general directed graphs, where tt is the treewidth of the underlying undirected graph. This is matched by a dynamic programming algorithm with running time 2O(tlogt)nO(1)2^{\mathcal{O}(t\log t)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}. On the other hand, we show that if the input digraph is planar, then the running time can be improved to 2O(t)nO(1)2^{\mathcal{O}(t)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}.Comment: 20

    Parameterized Algorithms for Finding Large Sparse Subgraphs:Kernelization and Beyond

    Get PDF

    On Supergraphs Satisfying CMSO Properties

    Get PDF
    Let CMSO denote the counting monadic second order logic of graphs. We give a constructive proof that for some computable function f, there is an algorithm A that takes as input a CMSO sentence F, a positive integer t, and a connected graph G of maximum degree at most D, and determines, in time f(|F|,t)*2^O(D*t)*|G|^O(t), whether G has a supergraph G\u27 of treewidth at most t such that G\u27 satisfies F. The algorithmic metatheorem described above sheds new light on certain unresolved questions within the framework of graph completion algorithms. In particular, using this metatheorem, we provide an explicit algorithm that determines, in time f(d)*2^O(D*d)*|G|^O(d), whether a connected graph of maximum degree D has a planar supergraph of diameter at most d. Additionally, we show that for each fixed k, the problem of determining whether G has a k-outerplanar supergraph of diameter at most d is strongly uniformly fixed parameter tractable with respect to the parameter d. This result can be generalized in two directions. First, the diameter parameter can be replaced by any contraction-closed effectively CMSO-definable parameter p. Examples of such parameters are vertex-cover number, dominating number, and many other contraction-bidimensional parameters. In the second direction, the planarity requirement can be relaxed to bounded genus, and more generally, to bounded local treewidth

    FPT is Characterized by Useful Obstruction Sets

    Full text link
    Many graph problems were first shown to be fixed-parameter tractable using the results of Robertson and Seymour on graph minors. We show that the combination of finite, computable, obstruction sets and efficient order tests is not just one way of obtaining strongly uniform FPT algorithms, but that all of FPT may be captured in this way. Our new characterization of FPT has a strong connection to the theory of kernelization, as we prove that problems with polynomial kernels can be characterized by obstruction sets whose elements have polynomial size. Consequently we investigate the interplay between the sizes of problem kernels and the sizes of the elements of such obstruction sets, obtaining several examples of how results in one area yield new insights in the other. We show how exponential-size minor-minimal obstructions for pathwidth k form the crucial ingredient in a novel OR-cross-composition for k-Pathwidth, complementing the trivial AND-composition that is known for this problem. In the other direction, we show that OR-cross-compositions into a parameterized problem can be used to rule out the existence of efficiently generated quasi-orders on its instances that characterize the NO-instances by polynomial-size obstructions.Comment: Extended abstract with appendix, as accepted to WG 201

    Minor­Obstructions for Apex Pseudoforests

    Get PDF
    Ένα γράφημα ανήκει στην κλάση των ψευδοδασών αν κάθε συνεκτική συνιστώσα του περιέχει το πολύ έναν κύκλο. Ένα γράφημα είναι απόγειο­ψευδοδάσος αν μπορεί να μετατραπεί σε ψευδοδάσος με την αφαίρεση μίας κορυφής. Έχουμε εντοπίσει τα 33 γραφήματα τα οποία αποτελούν το σύνολο παρεμπόδισης για την κλάση γραφημάτων απόγεια­ψευδοδάση, δηλαδή τα ελαχιστικά γραφήματα ως προς την σχέση του ελάσσονος, τα οποία δεν είναι απόγεια­ψευδοδάση.A graph is called a pseudoforest if none of its connected components contains more than one cycle. A graph is an apex­pseudoforest if it can become a pseudoforest by removing one of its vertices. We identify 33 graphs that form the minor obstruction set of the class of apex­pseudoforests, i.e., the set of all minor­minimal graphs that are not apex­pseudoforests

    Hitting forbidden minors: Approximation and Kernelization

    Get PDF
    We study a general class of problems called F-deletion problems. In an F-deletion problem, we are asked whether a subset of at most kk vertices can be deleted from a graph GG such that the resulting graph does not contain as a minor any graph from the family F of forbidden minors. We obtain a number of algorithmic results on the F-deletion problem when F contains a planar graph. We give (1) a linear vertex kernel on graphs excluding tt-claw K1,tK_{1,t}, the star with tt leves, as an induced subgraph, where tt is a fixed integer. (2) an approximation algorithm achieving an approximation ratio of O(log3/2OPT)O(\log^{3/2} OPT), where OPTOPT is the size of an optimal solution on general undirected graphs. Finally, we obtain polynomial kernels for the case when F contains graph θc\theta_c as a minor for a fixed integer cc. The graph θc\theta_c consists of two vertices connected by cc parallel edges. Even though this may appear to be a very restricted class of problems it already encompasses well-studied problems such as {\sc Vertex Cover}, {\sc Feedback Vertex Set} and Diamond Hitting Set. The generic kernelization algorithm is based on a non-trivial application of protrusion techniques, previously used only for problems on topological graph classes
    corecore