1,507 research outputs found

    South American Expert Roundtable : increasing adaptive governance capacity for coping with unintended side effects of digital transformation

    Get PDF
    This paper presents the main messages of a South American expert roundtable (ERT) on the unintended side effects (unseens) of digital transformation. The input of the ERT comprised 39 propositions from 20 experts representing 11 different perspectives. The two-day ERT discussed the main drivers and challenges as well as vulnerabilities or unseens and provided suggestions for: (i) the mechanisms underlying major unseens; (ii) understanding possible ways in which rebound effects of digital transformation may become the subject of overarching research in three main categories of impact: development factors, society, and individuals; and (iii) a set of potential action domains for transdisciplinary follow-up processes, including a case study in Brazil. A content analysis of the propositions and related mechanisms provided insights in the genesis of unseens by identifying 15 interrelated causal mechanisms related to critical issues/concerns. Additionally, a cluster analysis (CLA) was applied to structure the challenges and critical developments in South America. The discussion elaborated the genesis, dynamics, and impacts of (groups of) unseens such as the digital divide (that affects most countries that are not included in the development of digital business, management, production, etc. tools) or the challenge of restructuring small- and medium-sized enterprises (whose service is digitally substituted by digital devices). We identify specific issues and effects (for most South American countries) such as lack of governmental structure, challenging geographical structures (e.g., inclusion in high-performance transmission power), or the digital readiness of (wide parts) of society. One scientific contribution of the paper is related to the presented methodology that provides insights into the phenomena, the causal chains underlying “wanted/positive” and “unwanted/negative” effects, and the processes and mechanisms of societal changes caused by digitalization

    Assessing SMEs’ cybersecurity organizational readiness: Findings from an Italian survey

    Get PDF
    The Small and Medium-sized Enterprises’ (SMEs) level of organizational cybersecurity readiness has been poorly investigated to date. Currently, all SMEs need to maintain an adequate level of cybersecurity to run their businesses, not only those wishing to fully exploit digitalization’s benefits. Unfortunately, due to their lack of resources, skills, and their low level of cyber awareness, SMEs often seem unprepared. It is essential that they address the digital threats that they face by using technology and complementary (and not alternative) factors, such as guidelines, formal policies, and training. All these elements trigger development processes regarding skills, awareness, the organizational cybersecurity culture, and the organizational resilience. This paper describes Italy’s first multidisciplinary attempt to assess its SMEs’ overall cybersecurity readiness level. We used a survey as its initial quantitative assessment approach, although SMEs can also use it as a cyber self-assessment tool, which prepares them better to navigate the digital ecosystem. Thereafter, we held semi-structured interviews to explore the critical points that had emerged from the study’s first phase. The overall results show that SMEs have not yet achieved high levels of organizational readiness. SMEs are currently starting to set the stage for their organizational cyber readiness and will, therefore, have to take many more proactive steps to address their cyber challenges

    Seeking the Entanglement of Immersion and Emergence: Reflections from an Analysis of the State of IS Research on Virtual Worlds

    Get PDF
    This paper critically reviews the state of virtual world research within the Information Systems field; revealing areas of interest evident in research studies between 2007-2011, the methods employed to conduct such research, the theories/frameworks used to ground VW research, as well as reoccurring memes/concepts. We argue that virtual worlds are best interpreted as both an immersive and emergent co-creative process, ‘performed’ by users’ actions and interactions both with other users and with artifacts such as virtual goods. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals a near neglect of the substantive nature of digital materiality and of the emergent nature of virtual worlds. We conclude that this ‘human-centric’ stance has taken focus away from the unique nature of the virtual world artifact itself, and posit a research agenda that focuses on virtual world objects as well as the immersive and emergent activities of ‘world-builders’ as necessary to advance virtual world research

    Factores asociados al uso de software en åreas estratégicas y complementariedad con la innovación: evidencia a nivel firma para el Partido de General Pueyrredon

    Get PDF
    El paradigma productivo actual se caracteriza por el crecimiento en el uso y el desarrollo de las TecnologĂ­as de la InformaciĂłn y las Comunicaciones (TIC), las cuales realizan importantes aportes a la productividad y competitividad de las empresas. Si bien en el Partido de General Pueyrredon el 75% de las firmas industriales utilizan software en al menos un ĂĄrea, su aporte especĂ­fico y los factores que inciden en su adopciĂłn no han sido explorados. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar los factores asociados al uso de software en ĂĄreas estratĂ©gicas de las firmas y avanzar sobre una lĂ­nea de investigaciĂłn aĂșn no explorada para la Argentina: la complementariedad entre el uso de software en ĂĄreas estratĂ©gicas y la obtenciĂłn de resultados de innovaciĂłn. Se emplean datos de 280 empresas relevadas en 2018 para estimar modelos lineales generalizados y un modelo bivariado de elecciĂłn binaria.The current productive paradigm is characterized by the presence and development of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), with important contributions to firm productivity and competitiveness. Even though 75% of the industrial firms in General Pueyrredon District use software in at least one area, its specific contribution and the factors that influence its usage have not been explored as of yet. This paper seeks to analyse software-use related factors in strategic areas, and to advance on a new line of work in Argentina: the complementarity between software use in strategic areas and innovation output. Data from 280 firms surveyed in 2018 was used to estimate generalized linear models and a bivariate probit model.Fil: Marcel, Lizzie. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias EconĂłmicas y Sociales; Argentina.Fil: Mauro, LucĂ­a Mercedes. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias EconĂłmicas y Sociales; Argentina.Fil: Liseras, Natacha. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias EconĂłmicas y Sociales; Argentina

    Factors affecting innovation revisited

    Get PDF
    El propĂłsito de este trabajo es contribuir a un mejor conocimiento de los factores que afectan a la innovaciĂłn mediante el anĂĄlisis de los microdatos de la encuesta de innovaciĂłn de las empresas españolas de 2003. El estudio se aborda desde la elaboraciĂłn de una taxonomĂ­a de sectores combinando las Ventajas TecnolĂłgicas Reveladas de la industria española con el dinamismo tecnolĂłgico mundial; ademĂĄs se introduce una clasificaciĂłn de las empresas en funciĂłn de la pertenencia o no a un grupo de empresas y de si esos grupos son de nacionalidad española o extranjera. Se utilizan tĂ©cnicas de AnĂĄlisis Factorial para reducir y organizar la abundante informaciĂłn disponible en Factores con significado econĂłmico que despuĂ©s son empleados como variables explicativas de la innovaciĂłn de producto y de proceso. Se encuentran diferencias entre ambos tipos de innovaciĂłn tanto por el nĂșmero de factores significativos como en la intensidad de su capacidad explicativa. La taxonomĂ­a elaborada muestra su importancia al mostrar patrones de comportamiento distintos entre los cuatro tipos de casos construidos.The aim of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of factors affecting innovation by analysing the Spanish manufacturing sector using microdata of the 2003 Spanish Innovation Survey. To enrich the analysis a self developed sectoral taxonomy is used coming from the combination of both of the sectoral Revealed Technological Advantages (RTA) and worldwide technological dynamism of the sectors; moreover firms are classified according to the type of capital ownership: independent companies, companies belonging to a national group and subsidiaries of multinational enterprises. The abundance and heterogeneity of variables advised us to use Factor analysis to reduce and organise the original variables into a number of consistent and theoretically significant factors. We found differences between product and process innovation, both in number of explicative variables (significant independent variables) and in relative effect of independent variables (even, in some cases, a sign change from product to process innovation). Taxonomy matters because of some differences in explanatory (independent) variables for each sector and model explanatory power differences between sectors, and, on the other hand, because of the “non significance” of some significant variables once we control by sectoral taxonomy.Innovation, Factors affecting innovation, Multinational enterprises, Sectoral taxonomies, Spain.

    Determinantes de la adopciĂłn de las TIC en las tramas productivas automotriz y siderĂșrgica de Argentina.

    Get PDF
    Este trabajo realiza un aporte a la literatura sobre los determinantes de la adopciĂłn de las nuevas TecnologĂ­as de la InformaciĂłn y de la ComunicaciĂłn (TIC) a nivel empresarial en el sector industrial de Argentina. Con este fin, se estima un modelo sobre los determinantes de la adopciĂłn de las TIC. Los resultados hallados indican que los factores que influyen positivamente en la adopciĂłn de las TIC en estas industrias son la pertenencia a un grupo econĂłmico, el nivel global de innovaciĂłn y el nivel de aprendizaje interno de la empresa.http://www.tecsi.fea.usp.br/contecsi/index.php/contecsi/index/search/authors/view?firstName=Carola&middleName=&lastName=Jones&affiliation=Centro%20de%20Computaci%C3%B3n%20y%20Tecnolog%C3%ADas%20de%20Informaci%C3%B3n.%20Facultad%20de%20Ciencias%20Econ%C3%BFil: Alderete, VerĂłnica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones EconĂłmicas y Sociales del Sur; Argentina.Fil: Jones, Carola. Universidad Nacional de CĂłrdoba. Facultad de Ciencias EconĂłmicas; Argentina.Fil: Morero, HernĂĄn. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad; Argentina.Fil: Morero, HernĂĄn. Universidad Nacional de CĂłrdoba. Facultad de Ciencias EconĂłmicas; Argentina.OrganizaciĂłn Industria

    Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture

    Full text link
    [EN] The term "Agri-Food 4.0" is an analogy to the term Industry 4.0; coming from the concept "agriculture 4.0". Since the origins of the industrial revolution, where the steam engines started the concept of Industry 1.0 and later the use of electricity upgraded the concept to Industry 2.0, the use of technologies generated a milestone in the industry revolution by addressing the Industry 3.0 concept. Hence, Industry 4.0, it is about including and integrating the latest developments based on digital technologies as well as the interoperability process across them. This allows enterprises to transmit real-time information in terms behaviour and performance. Therefore, the challenge is to maintain these complex networked structures efficiently linked and organised within the use of such technologies, especially to identify and satisfy supply chain stakeholders dynamic requirements. In this context, the agriculture domain is not an exception although it possesses some specialities depending from the domain. In fact, all agricultural machinery incorporates electronic controls and has entered to the digital age, enhancing their current performance. In addition, electronics, using sensors and drones, support the data collection of several agriculture key aspects, such as weather, geographical spatialization, animals and crops behaviours, as well as the entire farm life cycle. However, the use of the right methods and methodologies for enhancing agriculture supply chains performance is still a challenge, thus the concept of Industry 4.0 has evolved and adapted to agriculture 4.0 in order analyse the behaviours and performance in this specific domain. Thus, the question mark on how agriculture 4.0 support a better supply chain decision-making process, or how can help to save time to farmer to make effective decision based on objective data, remains open. Therefore, in this survey, a review of more than hundred papers on new technologies and the new available supply chains methods are analysed and contrasted to understand the future paths of the Agri-Food domain.Authors of this publication acknowledge the contribution of the Project 691249, RUC-APS "Enhancing and implementing Knowledge based ICT solutions within high Risk and Uncertain Conditions for Agriculture Production Systems" (www.ruc-aps.eu), funded by the European Union under their funding scheme H2020-MSCARISE-2015.Lezoche, M.; HernĂĄndez, JE.; Alemany DĂ­az, MDM.; Panetto, H.; Kacprzyk, J. (2020). Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture. Computers in Industry. 117:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103187S115117Ahumada, O., & Villalobos, J. R. (2009). Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1), 1-20. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.014Ait-Mouheb, N., Bahri, A., Thayer, B. B., Benyahia, B., BourriĂ©, G., Cherki, B., 
 Harmand, J. (2018). The reuse of reclaimed water for irrigation around the Mediterranean Rim: a step towards a more virtuous cycle? Regional Environmental Change, 18(3), 693-705. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1292-zAli, J., & Kumar, S. (2011). Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and farmers’ decision-making across the agricultural supply chain. International Journal of Information Management, 31(2), 149-159. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.008Alzahrani, S. M. (2018). Development of IoT mining machine for Twitter sentiment analysis: Mining in the cloud and results on the mirror. 2018 15th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T). doi:10.1109/lt.2018.8368490Amandeep, Bhattacharjee, A., Das, P., Basu, D., Roy, S., Ghosh, S., 
 Rana, T. K. (2017). Smart farming using IOT. 2017 8th IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON). doi:10.1109/iemcon.2017.8117219Annosi, M. C., Brunetta, F., Monti, A., & Nati, F. (2019). Is the trend your friend? An analysis of technology 4.0 investment decisions in agricultural SMEs. Computers in Industry, 109, 59-71. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.003Baio, F. H. R. (2011). Evaluation of an auto-guidance system operating on a sugar cane harvester. Precision Agriculture, 13(1), 141-147. doi:10.1007/s11119-011-9241-6Belaud, J.-P., Prioux, N., Vialle, C., & Sablayrolles, C. (2019). Big data for agri-food 4.0: Application to sustainability management for by-products supply chain. Computers in Industry, 111, 41-50. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.06.006Nicolaas Bezuidenhout, C., Bodhanya, S., & Brenchley, L. (2012). An analysis of collaboration in a sugarcane production and processing supply chain. British Food Journal, 114(6), 880-895. doi:10.1108/00070701211234390Bhatt, M. R., & Buch, S. (2015). Prediction of formability for sheet metal component using artificial intelligent technique. 2015 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN). doi:10.1109/spin.2015.7095356Birkel, H. S., & Hartmann, E. (2019). Impact of IoT challenges and risks for SCM. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(1), 39-61. doi:10.1108/scm-03-2018-0142Boehlje, M. (1999). Structural Changes in the Agricultural Industries: How Do We Measure, Analyze and Understand Them? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(5), 1028-1041. doi:10.2307/1244080Bonney, L., Clark, R., Collins, R., & Fearne, A. (2007). From serendipity to sustainable competitive advantage: insights from Houston’s Farm and their journey of co‐innovation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(6), 395-399. doi:10.1108/13598540710826326Boshkoska, B. M., Liu, S., Zhao, G., Fernandez, A., Gamboa, S., del Pino, M., 
 Chen, H. (2019). A decision support system for evaluation of the knowledge sharing crossing boundaries in agri-food value chains. Computers in Industry, 110, 64-80. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.012Brewster, C., Roussaki, I., Kalatzis, N., Doolin, K., & Ellis, K. (2017). IoT in Agriculture: Designing a Europe-Wide Large-Scale Pilot. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(9), 26-33. doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1600528Bronson, K., & Knezevic, I. (2016). Big Data in food and agriculture. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 205395171664817. doi:10.1177/2053951716648174Brown, K. (2013). Global environmental change I. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 107-117. doi:10.1177/0309132513498837Chilcanan, D., Navas, P., & Escobar, S. M. (2017). Expert system for remote process automation in multiplatform servers, through human machine conversation. 2017 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). doi:10.23919/cisti.2017.7975913Choi, J., In, Y., Park, C., Seok, S., Seo, H., & Kim, H. (2016). Secure IoT framework and 2D architecture for End-To-End security. The Journal of Supercomputing, 74(8), 3521-3535. doi:10.1007/s11227-016-1684-0Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. doi:10.2307/2393553Dabbene, F., Gay, P., & Tortia, C. (2014). Traceability issues in food supply chain management: A review. Biosystems Engineering, 120, 65-80. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.09.006Del Borghi, A., Gallo, M., Strazza, C., & Del Borghi, M. (2014). An evaluation of environmental sustainability in the food industry through Life Cycle Assessment: the case study of tomato products supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 78, 121-130. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.083Devarakonda, R., Shrestha, B., Palanisamy, G., Hook, L., Killeffer, T., Krassovski, M., 
 Lazer, K. (2014). OME: Tool for generating and managing metadata to handle BigData. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). doi:10.1109/bigdata.2014.7004476Nascimento, A. F. do, Mendonça, E. de S., Leite, L. F. C., Scholberg, J., & Neves, J. C. L. (2012). Calibration and validation of models for short-term decomposition and N mineralization of plant residues in the tropics. Scientia Agricola, 69(6), 393-401. doi:10.1590/s0103-90162012000600008Dolan, C., & Humphrey, J. (2000). Governance and Trade in Fresh Vegetables: The Impact of UK Supermarkets on the African Horticulture Industry. Journal of Development Studies, 37(2), 147-176. doi:10.1080/713600072Dragincic, J., Korac, N., & Blagojevic, B. (2015). Group multi-criteria decision making (GMCDM) approach for selecting the most suitable table grape variety intended for organic viticulture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 111, 194-202. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2014.12.023Dworak, V., Selbeck, J., Dammer, K.-H., Hoffmann, M., Zarezadeh, A., & Bobda, C. (2013). Strategy for the Development of a Smart NDVI Camera System for Outdoor Plant Detection and Agricultural Embedded Systems. Sensors, 13(2), 1523-1538. doi:10.3390/s130201523Eisele, M., Kiese, R., KrĂ€mer, A., & Leibundgut, C. (2001). Application of a catchment water quality model for assessment and prediction of nitrogen budgets. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 26(7-8), 547-551. doi:10.1016/s1464-1909(01)00048-xElsayed, K. M. F., Ismail, T., & S. Ouf, N. (2018). A Review on the Relevant Applications of Machine Learning in Agriculture. IJIREEICE, 6(8), 1-17. doi:10.17148/ijireeice.2018.681Esteso, A., Alemany, M. M. E., & Ortiz, A. (2017). MĂ©todos y Modelos Deterministas e Inciertos para la GestiĂłn de Cadenas de Suministro Agroalimentarias. DirecciĂłn y OrganizaciĂłn, 41-46. doi:10.37610/dyo.v0i0.509Esteso, A., Alemany, M. M. E., & Ortiz, A. (2018). Conceptual framework for designing agri-food supply chains under uncertainty by mathematical programming models. International Journal of Production Research, 56(13), 4418-4446. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1447706GERHARDS, R., GUTJAHR, C., WEIS, M., KELLER, M., SÖKEFELD, M., MÖHRING, J., & PIEPHO, H. P. (2011). Using precision farming technology to quantify yield effects attributed to weed competition and herbicide application. Weed Research, 52(1), 6-15. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00893.xGovindan, K., Jafarian, A., Khodaverdi, R., & Devika, K. (2014). Two-echelon multiple-vehicle location–routing problem with time windows for optimization of sustainable supply chain network of perishable food. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 9-28. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.028Gumaste, S. S., & Kadam, A. J. (2016). Future weather prediction using genetic algorithm and FFT for smart farming. 2016 International Conference on Computing Communication Control and automation (ICCUBEA). doi:10.1109/iccubea.2016.7860028Hashem, H., & Ranc, D. (2016). A review of modeling toolbox for BigData. 2016 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS). doi:10.1109/icmcis.2016.7496565Hefnawy, A., Elhariri, T., Cherifi, C., Robert, J., Bouras, A., Kubler, S., & Framling, K. (2017). Combined use of lifecycle management and IoT in smart cities. 2017 11th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA). doi:10.1109/skima.2017.8294112Hosseini, S. H., Tang, C. Y., & Jiang, J. N. (2014). Calibration of a Wind Farm Wind Speed Model With Incomplete Wind Data. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 5(1), 343-350. doi:10.1109/tste.2013.2284490Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Li, J., & Mehrotra, S. (2016). ICME 2016 Image Recognition Grand Challenge. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW). doi:10.1109/icmew.2016.7574663A. Irmak, J. W. Jones, W. D. Batchelor, S. Irmak, K. J. Boote, & J. O. Paz. (2006). Artificial Neural Network Model as a Data Analysis Tool in Precision Farming. Transactions of the ASABE, 49(6), 2027-2037. doi:10.13031/2013.22264Jeon, S., Kim, B., & Huh, J. (2017). Study on methods to determine rotor equivalent wind speed to increase prediction accuracy of wind turbine performance under wake condition. Energy for Sustainable Development, 40, 41-49. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2017.06.001Joly, P.-B. (2005). Resilient farming systems in a complex world — new issues for the governance of science and innovation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 45(6), 617. doi:10.1071/ea03252Joshi, R., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2009). Indian cold chain: modeling the inhibitors. British Food Journal, 111(11), 1260-1283. doi:10.1108/00070700911001077Kamata, T., Roshanianfard, A., & Noguchi, N. (2018). Heavy-weight Crop Harvesting Robot - Controlling Algorithm. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(17), 244-249. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.165Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2020). Achieving sustainable performance in a data-driven agriculture supply chain: A review for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 179-194. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.022Kamilaris, A., Kartakoullis, A., & Prenafeta-BoldĂș, F. X. (2017). A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 143, 23-37. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.037Kelepouris, T., Pramatari, K., & Doukidis, G. (2007). RFID‐enabled traceability in the food supply chain. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(2), 183-200. doi:10.1108/02635570710723804Khan, S. F., & Ismail, M. Y. (2018). An Investigation into the Challenges and Opportunities Associated with the Application of Internet of Things (IoT) in the Agricultural Sector-A Review. Journal of Computer Science, 14(2), 132-143. doi:10.3844/jcssp.2018.132.143Kladivko, E. J., Helmers, M. J., Abendroth, L. J., Herzmann, D., Lal, R., Castellano, M. J., 
 Villamil, M. B. (2014). Standardized research protocols enable transdisciplinary research of climate variation impacts in corn production systems. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 69(6), 532-542. doi:10.2489/jswc.69.6.532Ko, T., Lee, J., & Ryu, D. (2018). Blockchain Technology and Manufacturing Industry: Real-Time Transparency and Cost Savings. Sustainability, 10(11), 4274. doi:10.3390/su10114274KÖK, M. S. (2009). Application of Food Safety Management Systems (ISO 22000/HACCP) in the Turkish Poultry Industry: A Comparison Based on Enterprise Size. Journal of Food Protection, 72(10), 2221-2225. doi:10.4315/0362-028x-72.10.2221KvĂ­z, Z., Kroulik, M., & Chyba, J. (2014). Machinery guidance systems analysis concerning pass-to-pass accuracy as a tool for efficient plant production in fields and for soil damage reduction. Plant, Soil and Environment, 60(No. 1), 36-42. doi:10.17221/622/2012-pseLamsal, K., Jones, P. C., & Thomas, B. W. (2016). Harvest logistics in agricultural systems with multiple, independent producers and no on-farm storage. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 91, 129-138. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2015.10.018Laube, P., Duckham, M., & Palaniswami, M. (2011). Deferred decentralized movement pattern mining for geosensor networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(2), 273-292. doi:10.1080/13658810903296630Li, F.-R., Gao, C.-Y., Zhao, H.-L., & Li, X.-Y. (2002). Soil conservation effectiveness and energy efficiency of alternative rotations and continuous wheat cropping in the Loess Plateau of northwest China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 91(1-3), 101-111. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00265-1Liakos, K., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674. doi:10.3390/s18082674Meichen, L., Jun, C., Xiang, Z., Lu, W., & Yongpeng, T. (2018). Dynamic obstacle detection based on multi-sensor information fusion. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(17), 861-865. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.086Louwagie, G., Northey, G., Finn, J. A., & Purvis, G. (2012). Development of indicators for assessment of the environmental impact of livestock farming in Ireland using the Agri-environmental Footprint Index. Ecological Indicators, 18, 149-162. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.11.003Luque, A., Peralta, M. E., de las Heras, A., & CĂłrdoba, A. (2017). State of the Industry 4.0 in the Andalusian food sector. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1199-1205. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.195Malhotra, S., Doja, M. ., Alam, B., & Alam, M. (2017). Bigdata analysis and comparison of bigdata analytic approches. 2017 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA). doi:10.1109/ccaa.2017.8229821Mayer, J., Gunst, L., MĂ€der, P., Samson, M.-F., Carcea, M., Narducci, V., 
 Dubois, D. (2015). «Productivity, quality and sustainability of winter wheat under long-term conventional and organic management in Switzerland». European Journal of Agronomy, 65, 27-39. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.01.002McGuire, S., & Sperling, L. (2013). Making seed systems more resilient to stress. Global Environmental Change, 23(3), 644-653. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.001Mekala, M. S., & Viswanathan, P. (2017). A Survey: Smart agriculture IoT with cloud computing. 2017 International conference on Microelectronic Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICMDCS). doi:10.1109/icmdcs.2017.8211551Mishra, S., Mishra, D., & Santra, G. H. (2016). Applications of Machine Learning Techniques in Agricultural Crop Production: A Review Paper. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(38). doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i38/95032Mocnej, J., Seah, W. K. G., Pekar, A., & Zolotova, I. (2018). Decentralised IoT Architecture for Efficient Resources Utilisation. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(6), 168-173. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.07.148Mohanraj, I., Gokul, V., Ezhilarasie, R., & Umamakeswari, A. (2017). Intelligent drip irrigation and fertigation using wireless sensor networks. 2017 IEEE Technological Innovations in ICT for Agriculture and Rural Development (TIAR). doi:10.1109/tiar.2017.8273682Montecinos, J., Ouhimmou, M., Chauhan, S., & Paquet, M. (2018). Forecasting multiple waste collecting sites for the agro-food industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 932-939. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.127Yandun NarvĂĄez, F., Gregorio, E., EscolĂ , A., Rosell-Polo, J. R., Torres-Torriti, M., & Auat Cheein, F. (2018). Terrain classification using ToF sensors for the enhancement of agricultural machinery traversability. Journal of Terramechanics, 76, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.jterra.2017.10.005Nguyen, T., ZHOU, L., Spiegler, V., Ieromonachou, P., & Lin, Y. (2018). Big data analytics in supply chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. Computers & Operations Research, 98, 254-264. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2017.07.004Nilsson, E., Hochrainer-Stigler, S., Mochizuki, J., & Uvo, C. B. (2016). Hydro-climatic variability and agricultural production on the shores of Lake Chad. Environmental Development, 20, 15-30. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2016.09.001Nolan, P., Paley, D. A., & Kroeger, K. (2017). Multi-UAS path planning for non-uniform data collection in precision agriculture. 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference. doi:10.1109/aero.2017.7943794Oberholster, C., Adendorff, C., & Jonker, K. (2015). Financing Agricultural Production from a Value Chain Perspective. Outlook on Agriculture, 44(1), 49-60. doi:10.5367/oa.2015.0197Opara, L. U., & Mazaud, F. (2001). Food Traceability from Field to Plate. Outlook on Agriculture, 30(4), 239-247. doi:10.5367/000000001101293724Ott, K.-H., Aranı́bar, N., Singh, B., & Stockton, G. W. (2003). Metabonomics classifies pathways affected by bioactive compounds. Artificial neural network classification of NMR spectra of plant extracts. Phytochemistry, 62(6), 971-985. doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00717-3Panetto, H. (2007). Towards a classification framework for interoperability of enterprise applications. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 20(8), 727-740. doi:10.1080/09511920600996419Paulraj, G. J. L., Francis, S. A. J., Peter, J. D., & Jebadurai, I. J. (2018). Resource-aware virtual machine migration in IoT cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems, 85, 173-183. doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.03.024Pilli, S. K., Nallathambi, B., George, S. J., & Diwanji, V. (2015). eAGROBOT — A robot for early crop disease detection using image processing. 2015 2nd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS). doi:10.1109/ecs.2015.7124873Pinho, P., Dias, T., Cruz, C., Sim Tang, Y., Sutton, M. A., Martins-Loução, M.-A., 
 Branquinho, C. (2011). Using lichen functional diversity to assess the effects of atmospheric ammonia in Mediterranean woodlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(5), 1107-1116. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02033.xPrathibha, S. R., Hongal, A., & Jyothi, M. P. (2017). IOT Based Monitoring System in Smart Agriculture. 2017 International Conference on Recent Advances in Electronics and Communication Technology (ICRAECT). doi:10.1109/icraect.2017.52Reardon, T., Echeverria, R., BerdeguĂ©, J., Minten, B., Liverpool-Tasie, S., Tschirley, D., & Zilberman, D. (2019). Rapid transformation of food systems in developing regions: Highlighting the role of agricultural research & innovations. Agricultural Systems, 172, 47-59. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.022Ribarics, P. (2016). Big Data and its impact on agriculture. Ecocycles, 2(1), 33-34. doi:10.19040/ecocycles.v2i1.54Rosell, J. R., & Sanz, R. (2012). A review of methods and applications of the geometric characterization of tree crops in agricultural activities. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 81, 124-141. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2011.09.007Roshanianfard, A., Kamata, T., & Noguchi, N. (2018). Performance evaluation of harvesting robot for heavy-weight crops. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(17), 332-338. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.200Routroy, S., & Behera, A. (2017). Agriculture supply chain. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 7(3), 275-302. doi:10.1108/jadee-06-2016-0039Ruiz-Garcia, L., Steinberger, G., & Rothmund, M. (2010). A model and prototype implementation for tracking and tracing agricultural batch products along the food chain. Food Control, 21(2), 112-121. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.12.003Saggi, M. K., & Jain, S. (2018). A survey towards an integration of big

    Social Media Marketing Strategies in Nonprofit Professional Membership Organizations

    Get PDF
    The use of social media in nonprofit professional membership organizations affects how leaders communicate with members, consumers, the community, and other stakeholders. The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study was to explore the social media marketing strategies that leaders in nonprofit professional membership organizations use to keep their organizations sustainable. Data were collected from 5 social media marketing leaders representing 5 nonprofit professional membership organizations in the Chicago region. Data collection occurred through semistructured interviews, review of organizational documents pertaining to social media marketing strategies, and review of the social media sites and websites of the participants\u27 organizations. Rogers\u27s diffusion of innovation theory served as the conceptual framework for this study. A thematic analysis of the data yielded 4 themes: social media platforms and engagement strategies, social media content, social media challenges, and brand awareness. Leaders of nonprofit professional membership organizations who want to gain a competitive edge by using the appropriate social media platforms, creating quality content, overcoming challenges, and increasing brand awareness might choose to align with the strategies identified in this study. The findings of this study could help organizational leaders use social media marketing strategies effectively for engagement and organizational sustainability. The implications for positive social change arising from the use of social media by leaders in nonprofit professional membership organizations include opportunities to connect with and engage the public to build stronger communities through collaboration

    It’s All in Marshall: The Impact of External Economies on Regional Dynamics

    Get PDF
    Marshall's student Pigou noted: “It’s all in Marshall.” From a static point of view, this seems rather bold in a constantly changing world. However, this statement becomes more plausible in a dynamic context, where principles are subject to change. Indeed, over time, Marshall's concept of external economies gained fresh perspective as new concepts of regional characteristics and agglomeration evolved. This paper focuses on the impact of region and industry on dynamics and growth, distinguishing between industrial districts, industrial agglomerations and urban agglomerations. Based on these three types, we use a comprehensive large dataset on German regions to test the following: (1) these regions can be characterized by given location variables describing geographic location, firm structure, and surrounding location factors and (2) every region's locational variables affects its potential for dynamics.regional and urban development, agglomeration, industrial districts, location factors, external economies

    Rules versus Discretion in Loan Rate Setting

    Get PDF
    We propose a heteroscedastic regression model to identify the determinants of the dispersion in interest rates on loans granted to small and medium sized enterprises. We interpret unexplained deviations as evidence of the banks’ discretionary use of market power in the loan rate setting process. “Discretion” in the loan-pricing process is most important, we find, if: (i) loans are small and uncollateralized; (ii) firms are small, risky and difficult to monitor; (iii) firms’ owners are older, and, (iv) the banking market where the firm operates is large and highly concentrated. We also find that the weight of “discretion” in loan rates of small credits to opaque firms has decreased somewhat over the last fifteen years, consistent with the proliferation of information-technologies in the banking industry. Overall, our results reflect the relevance in the credit market of the costs firms face in searching information and switching lenders.financial intermediation. loan rates, price discrimination, variance analysis
    • 

    corecore