A general construction of Ordered Orthogonal Arrays using LFSRs

In \cite{Castoldi}, q^t \by (q+1)t ordered orthogonal arrays (OOAs) of strength $t$ over the alphabet \FF_q were constructed using linear feedback shift register sequences (LFSRs) defined by {\em primitive} polynomials in \FF_q[x]. In this paper we extend this result to all polynomials in \FF_q[x] which satisfy some fairly simple restrictions, restrictions that are automatically satisfied by primitive polynomials. While these restrictions sometimes reduce the number of columns produced from $(q+1)t$ to a smaller multiple of $t$, in many cases we still obtain the maximum number of columns in the constructed OOA when using non-primitive polynomials. For small values of $q$ and $t$, we generate OOAs in this manner for all permissible polynomials of degree $t$ in \FF_q[x] and compare the results to the ones produced in \cite{Castoldi}, \cite{Rosenbloom} and \cite{Skriganov} showing how close the arrays are to being "full" orthogonal arrays. Unusually for finite fields, our arrays based on non-primitive irreducible and even reducible polynomials are closer to orthogonal arrays than those built from primitive polynomials

Bounds on Covering Codes in RT spaces using Ordered Covering Arrays

In this work, constructions of ordered covering arrays are discussed and applied to obtain new upper bounds on covering codes in Rosenbloom-Tsfasman spaces (RT spaces), improving or extending some previous results.Comment: 12 page

Pseudorandom sequence generation using binary cellular automata

Tezin basılısı İstanbul Şehir Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi'ndedir.Random numbers are an integral part of many applications from computer simulations, gaming, security protocols to the practices of applied mathematics and physics. As randomness plays more critical roles, cheap and fast generation methods are becoming a point of interest for both scientific and technological use. Cellular Automata (CA) is a class of functions which attracts attention mostly due to the potential it holds in modeling complex phenomena in nature along with its discreteness and simplicity. Several studies are available in the literature expressing its potentiality for generating randomness and presenting its advantages over commonly used random number generators. Most of the researches in the CA field focus on one-dimensional 3-input CA rules. In this study, we perform an exhaustive search over the set of 5-input CA to find out the rules with high randomness quality. As the measure of quality, the outcomes of NIST Statistical Test Suite are used. Since the set of 5-input CA rules is very large (including more than 4.2 billions of rules), they are eliminated by discarding poor-quality rules before testing. In the literature, generally entropy is used as the elimination criterion, but we preferred mutual information. The main motive behind that choice is to find out a metric for elimination which is directly computed on the truth table of the CA rule instead of the generated sequence. As the test results collected on 3- and 4-input CA indicate, all rules with very good statistical performance have zero mutual information. By exploiting this observation, we limit the set to be tested to the rules with zero mutual information. The reasons and consequences of this choice are discussed. In total, more than 248 millions of rules are tested. Among them, 120 rules show out- standing performance with all attempted neighborhood schemes. Along with these tests, one of them is subjected to a more detailed testing and test results are included. Keywords: Cellular Automata, Pseudorandom Number Generators, Randomness TestsContents Declaration of Authorship ii Abstract iii Öz iv Acknowledgments v List of Figures ix List of Tables x 1 Introduction 1 2 Random Number Sequences 4 2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 Theoretical Approaches to Randomness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2.1 Information Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2.2 Complexity Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2.3 Computability Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.3 Random Number Generator Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.3.1 Physical TRNGs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3.2 Non-Physical TRNGs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.3.3 Pseudorandom Number Generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3.3.1 Generic Design of Pseudorandom Number Generators . . 10 2.3.3.2 Cryptographically Secure Pseudorandom Number Gener- ators . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 2.3.4 Hybrid Random Number Generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.4 A Comparison between True and Pseudo RNGs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.5 General Requirements on Random Number Sequences . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.6 Evaluation Criteria of PRNGs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.7 Statistical Test Suites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.8 NIST Test Suite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.8.1 Hypothetical Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.8.2 Tests in NIST Test Suite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.8.2.1 Frequency Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.8.2.2 Block Frequency Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.8.2.3 Runs Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.8.2.4 Longest Run of Ones in a Block . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.8.2.5 Binary Matrix Rank Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.8.2.6 Spectral Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.8.2.7 Non-overlapping Template Matching Test . . . . . . . . . 22 2.8.2.8 Overlapping Template Matching Test . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.8.2.9 Universal Statistical Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.8.2.10 Linear Complexity Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.8.2.11 Serial Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.8.2.12 Approximate Entropy Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.8.2.13 Cumulative Sums Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.8.2.14 Random Excursions Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.8.2.15 Random Excursions Variant Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3 Cellular Automata 26 3.1 History of Cellular Automata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 3.1.1 von Neumann’s Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.1.2 Conway’s Life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.1.3 Wolfram’s Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.2 Cellular Automata and the Definitive Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.2.1 Lattice Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.2.2 Cell Content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.2.3 Guiding Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.2.4 Neighborhood Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.3 A Formal Definition of Cellular Automata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.4 Elementary Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.5 Rule Families . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3.6 Producing Randomness via Cellular Automata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 3.6.1 CA-Based PRNGs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 3.6.2 Balancedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.6.3 Mutual Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.6.4 Entropy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4 Test Results 47 4.1 Output of a Statistical Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 4.2 Testing Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 4.3 Interpretation of the Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4.3.1 Rate of success over all trials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4.3.2 Distribution of P-values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.4 Testing over a big space of functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.5 Our Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 4.6 Results and Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.6.1 Change in State Width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 4.6.2 Change in Neighborhood Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 4.6.3 Entropy vs. Statistical Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 4.6.4 Mutual Information vs. Statistical Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 4.6.5 Entropy vs. Mutual Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.6.6 Overall Test Results of 4- and 5-input CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.7 The simplest rule: 1435932310 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5 Conclusion 74 A Test Results for Rule 30 and Rule 45 77 B 120 Rules with their Shortest Boolean Formulae 80 Bibliograph

Ordered Covering Arrays and Upper Bounds on Covering Codes in NRT spaces

This work shows several direct and recursive constructions of ordered covering arrays using projection, fusion, column augmentation, derivation, concatenation and cartesian product. Upper bounds on covering codes in NRT spaces are also obtained by improving a general upper bound. We explore the connection between ordered covering arrays and covering codes in NRT spaces, which generalize similar results for the Hamming metric. Combining the new upper bounds for covering codes in NRT spaces and ordered covering arrays, we improve upper bounds on covering codes in NRT spaces for larger alphabets. We give tables comparing the new upper bounds for covering codes to existing ones.Comment: 27 page

Performance Study of Hybrid Spread Spectrum Techniques

This thesis focuses on the performance analysis of hybrid direct sequence/slow frequency hopping (DS/SFH) and hybrid direct sequence/fast frequency hopping (DS/FFH) systems under multi-user interference and Rayleigh fading. First, we analyze the performance of direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS), slow frequency hopping (SFH) and fast frequency hopping (FFH) systems for varying processing gains under interference environment assuming equal bandwidth constraint with Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK) modulation and synchronous system. After thorough literature survey, we show that hybrid DS/FFH systems outperform both SFH and hybrid DS/SFH systems under Rayleigh fading and multi-user interference. Also, both hybrid DS/SFH and hybrid DS/FFH show performance improvement with increasing spreading factor and decreasing number of hopping frequencies

Space-time coding for CDMA-based wireless communication systems

Thesis (Master)--Izmir Institute of Technology, Electronics and Communication Engineering, Izmir, 2002Includes bibliographical references (leaves: 72-75)Text in English; Abstract: Turkish and Englishx, 75 leavesMultiple transmit antennas giving rise to diversity (transmit diversity) have been shown to increase downlink (base station to the mobile) capacity in cellular systems.The third generation partnership project (3GPP) for WCDMA has chosen space time transmit diversity (STTD) as the open loop transmit diversity technique for two transmit antennas.On the other hand, the CDMA 2000 has chosen space time spreading (STS) and orthogonal transmit diversity (OTD) as the open loop transmit diversity.In addition to all the standardization aspects, proposed contributions such as space time coding assisted double spread rake receiver (STC-DS-RR) are exist.In this thesis, open loop transmit diversity techniques of 3GPP, CDMA 2000 and existing contributions are investigated.Their performances are compared as a means of biterror- rate (BER) versus signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

An Analysis of Mutually Dispersive Brown Symbols for Non-Linear Ambiguity Suppression

This thesis significantly advances research towards the implementation of optimal Non-linear Ambiguity Suppression (NLS) waveforms by analyzing the Brown theorem. The Brown theorem is reintroduced with the use of simplified linear algebraic notation. A methodology for Brown symbol design and digitization is provided, and the concept of dispersive gain is introduced. Numerical methods are utilized to design, synthesize, and analyze Brown symbol performance. The theoretical performance in compression and dispersion of Brown symbols is demonstrated and is shown to exhibit significant improvement compared to discrete codes. As a result of this research a process is derived for the design of optimal mutually dispersive symbols for any sized family. In other words, the limitations imposed by conjugate LFM are overcome using NLS waveforms that provide an effective-fold increase in radar unambiguous range. This research effort has taken a theorem from its infancy, validated it analytically, simplified it algebraically, tested it for realizability, and now provides a means for the synthesis and digitization of pulse coded waveforms that generate an N-fold increase in radar effective unambiguous range. Peripherally, this effort has motivated many avenues of future research