Order-Sorted Unification with Regular Expression Sorts

We extend first-order order-sorted unification by permitting regular expression sorts for variables and in the domains of function symbols. The set of basic sorts is finite. The obtained signature corresponds to a finite bottom-up hedge automaton. The unification problem in such a theory generalizes some known unification problems. Its unification type is infinitary. We give a complete unification procedure and prove decidability

Matching Logic

This paper presents matching logic, a first-order logic (FOL) variant for specifying and reasoning about structure by means of patterns and pattern matching. Its sentences, the patterns, are constructed using variables, symbols, connectives and quantifiers, but no difference is made between function and predicate symbols. In models, a pattern evaluates into a power-set domain (the set of values that match it), in contrast to FOL where functions and predicates map into a regular domain. Matching logic uniformly generalizes several logical frameworks important for program analysis, such as: propositional logic, algebraic specification, FOL with equality, modal logic, and separation logic. Patterns can specify separation requirements at any level in any program configuration, not only in the heaps or stores, without any special logical constructs for that: the very nature of pattern matching is that if two structures are matched as part of a pattern, then they can only be spatially separated. Like FOL, matching logic can also be translated into pure predicate logic with equality, at the same time admitting its own sound and complete proof system. A practical aspect of matching logic is that FOL reasoning with equality remains sound, so off-the-shelf provers and SMT solvers can be used for matching logic reasoning. Matching logic is particularly well-suited for reasoning about programs in programming languages that have an operational semantics, but it is not limited to this

Order-sorted algebra I: equational deduction for multiple inheritance, overloading, exceptions and partial operations

AbstractThis paper generalizes many-sorted algebra (MSA) to order-sorted algebra (OSA) by allowing a partial ordering relation on the set of sorts. This supports abstract data types with multiple inheritance (in roughly the sense of object-oriented programming), several forms of polymorphism and overloading, partial operations (as total on equationally defined subsorts), exception handling, and an operational semantics based on term rewriting. We give the basic algebraic constructions for OSA, including quotient, image, product and term algebra, and we prove their basic properties, including quotient, homomorphism, and initiality theorems. The paper's major mathematical results include a notion of OSA deduction, a completeness theorem for it, and an OSA Birkhoff variety theorem. We also develop conditional OSA, including initiality, completeness, and McKinsey-Malcev quasivariety theorems, and we reduce OSA to (conditional) MSA, which allows lifting many known MSA results to OSA. Retracts, which intuitively are left inverses to subsort inclusions, provide relatively inexpensive run-time error handling. We show that it is safe to add retracts to any OSA signature, in the sense that it gives rise to a conservative extension. A final section compares and contrasts many different approaches to OSA. This paper also includes several examples demonstrating the flexibility and applicability of OSA, including some standard benchmarks like stack and list, as well as a much more substantial example, the number hierarchy from the naturals up to the quaternions

Type Inference for Records in a Natural Extension of ML

We describe an extension of ML with records where inheritance is given by ML generic polymorphism. All operations on records introduced by Wand in [Wan87] are supported, in particular the unrestricted extension of a field, and other operations such as renaming of fields are added. The solution relies on both an extension of ML, where the language of types is sorted and considered modulo equations [Rem9Ob], and on a record extension of types [Rem9Oc]. The solution is simple and modular and the type inference algorithm is efficient in practice

Programming and symbolic computation in Maude

[EN] Rewriting logic is both a flexible semantic framework within which widely different concurrent systems can be naturally specified and a logical framework in which widely different logics can be specified. Maude programs are exactly rewrite theories. Maude has also a formal environment of verification tools. Symbolic computation is a powerful technique for reasoning about the correctness of concurrent systems and for increasing the power of formal tools. We present several new symbolic features of Maude that enhance formal reasoning about Maude programs and the effectiveness of formal tools. They include: (i) very general unification modulo user-definable equational theories, and (ii) symbolic reachability analysis of concurrent systems using narrowing. The paper does not focus just on symbolic features: it also describes several other new Maude features, including: (iii) Maude's strategy language for controlling rewriting, and (iv) external objects that allow flexible interaction of Maude object-based concurrent systems with the external world. In particular, meta-interpreters are external objects encapsulating Maude interpreters that can interact with many other objects. To make the paper self-contained and give a reasonably complete language overview, we also review the basic Maude features for equational rewriting and rewriting with rules, Maude programming of concurrent object systems, and reflection. Furthermore, we include many examples illustrating all the Maude notions and features described in the paper.Duran has been partially supported by MINECO/FEDER project TIN2014-52034-R. Escobar has been partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the MCIU under grant RTI2018-094403-B-C32, by the Spanish Generalitat Valenciana under grant PROMETE0/2019/098, and by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research under award number FA9550-17-1-0286. MartiOliet and Rubio have been partially supported by MCIU Spanish project TRACES (TIN2015-67522-C3-3-R). Rubio has also been partially supported by a MCIU grant FPU17/02319. Meseguer and Talcott have been partially supported by NRL Grant N00173 -17-1-G002. Talcott has also been partially supported by ONR Grant N00014-15-1-2202.Durán, F.; Eker, S.; Escobar Román, S.; NARCISO MARTÍ OLIET; José Meseguer; Rubén Rubio; Talcott, C. (2020). Programming and symbolic computation in Maude. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming. 110:1-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlamp.2019.100497S158110Alpuente, M., Escobar, S., Espert, J., & Meseguer, J. (2014). A modular order-sorted equational generalization algorithm. Information and Computation, 235, 98-136. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2014.01.006K. Bae, J. Meseguer, Predicate abstraction of rewrite theories, in: [36], 2014, pp. 61–76.Bae, K., & Meseguer, J. (2015). Model checking linear temporal logic of rewriting formulas under localized fairness. Science of Computer Programming, 99, 193-234. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.02.006Bae, K., Meseguer, J., & Ölveczky, P. C. (2014). Formal patterns for multirate distributed real-time systems. Science of Computer Programming, 91, 3-44. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2013.09.010P. Borovanský, C. Kirchner, H. Kirchner, P.E. Moreau, C. Ringeissen, An overview of ELAN, in: [77], 1998, pp. 55–70.Bouhoula, A., Jouannaud, J.-P., & Meseguer, J. (2000). Specification and proof in membership equational logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 236(1-2), 35-132. doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(99)00206-6Bravenboer, M., Kalleberg, K. T., Vermaas, R., & Visser, E. (2008). Stratego/XT 0.17. A language and toolset for program transformation. Science of Computer Programming, 72(1-2), 52-70. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2007.11.003Bruni, R., & Meseguer, J. (2006). Semantic foundations for generalized rewrite theories. Theoretical Computer Science, 360(1-3), 386-414. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2006.04.012M. Clavel, F. Durán, S. Eker, S. Escobar, P. Lincoln, N. Martí-Oliet, C.L. Talcott, Two decades of Maude, in: [86], 2015, pp. 232–254.Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martı́-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., & Quesada, J. F. (2002). Maude: specification and programming in rewriting logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 285(2), 187-243. doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(01)00359-0Clavel, M., & Meseguer, J. (2002). Reflection in conditional rewriting logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 285(2), 245-288. doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(01)00360-7F. Durán, S. Eker, S. Escobar, N. Martí-Oliet, J. Meseguer, C.L. Talcott, Associative unification and symbolic reasoning modulo associativity in Maude, in: [121], 2018, pp. 98–114.Durán, F., Lucas, S., Marché, C., Meseguer, J., & Urbain, X. (2008). Proving operational termination of membership equational programs. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 21(1-2), 59-88. doi:10.1007/s10990-008-9028-2F. Durán, J. Meseguer, An extensible module algebra for Maude, in: [77], 1998, pp. 174–195.Durán, F., & Meseguer, J. (2003). Structured theories and institutions. Theoretical Computer Science, 309(1-3), 357-380. doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(03)00312-8Durán, F., & Meseguer, J. (2007). Maude’s module algebra. Science of Computer Programming, 66(2), 125-153. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2006.07.002Durán, F., & Meseguer, J. (2012). On the Church-Rosser and coherence properties of conditional order-sorted rewrite theories. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 81(7-8), 816-850. doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2011.12.004F. Durán, P.C. Ölveczky, A guide to extending Full Maude illustrated with the implementation of Real-Time Maude, in: [116], 2009, pp. 83–102.S. Escobar, Multi-paradigm programming in Maude, in: [121], 2018, pp. 26–44.Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J., & Santiago, S. (2014). State space reduction in the Maude-NRL Protocol Analyzer. Information and Computation, 238, 157-186. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2014.07.007Escobar, S., Sasse, R., & Meseguer, J. (2012). Folding variant narrowing and optimal variant termination. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 81(7-8), 898-928. doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2012.01.002H. Garavel, M. Tabikh, I. Arrada, Benchmarking implementations of term rewriting and pattern matching in algebraic, functional, and object-oriented languages – the 4th rewrite engines competition, in: [121], 2018, pp. 1–25.Goguen, J. A., & Burstall, R. M. (1992). Institutions: abstract model theory for specification and programming. Journal of the ACM, 39(1), 95-146. doi:10.1145/147508.147524Goguen, J. A., & Meseguer, J. (1984). Equality, types, modules, and (why not?) generics for logic programming. The Journal of Logic Programming, 1(2), 179-210. doi:10.1016/0743-1066(84)90004-9Goguen, J. A., & Meseguer, J. (1992). Order-sorted algebra I: equational deduction for multiple inheritance, overloading, exceptions and partial operations. Theoretical Computer Science, 105(2), 217-273. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(92)90302-vR. Gutiérrez, J. Meseguer, Variant-based decidable satisfiability in initial algebras with predicates, in: [61], 2018, pp. 306–322.Gutiérrez, R., Meseguer, J., & Rocha, C. (2015). Order-sorted equality enrichments modulo axioms. Science of Computer Programming, 99, 235-261. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.07.003Horn, A. (1951). On sentences which are true of direct unions of algebras. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 16(1), 14-21. doi:10.2307/2268661Katelman, M., Keller, S., & Meseguer, J. (2012). Rewriting semantics of production rule sets. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 81(7-8), 929-956. doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2012.06.002Kowalski, R. (1979). Algorithm = logic + control. Communications of the ACM, 22(7), 424-436. doi:10.1145/359131.359136Lucanu, D., Rusu, V., & Arusoaie, A. (2017). A generic framework for symbolic execution: A coinductive approach. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 80, 125-163. doi:10.1016/j.jsc.2016.07.012D. Lucanu, V. Rusu, A. Arusoaie, D. Nowak, Verifying reachability-logic properties on rewriting-logic specifications, in: [86], 2015, pp. 451–474.Lucas, S., & Meseguer, J. (2016). Normal forms and normal theories in conditional rewriting. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, 85(1), 67-97. doi:10.1016/j.jlamp.2015.06.001N. Martí-Oliet, J. Meseguer, A. Verdejo, A rewriting semantics for Maude strategies, in: [116], 2009, pp. 227–247.Martí-Oliet, N., Palomino, M., & Verdejo, A. (2007). Strategies and simulations in a semantic framework. Journal of Algorithms, 62(3-4), 95-116. doi:10.1016/j.jalgor.2007.04.002Meseguer, J. (1992). Conditional rewriting logic as a unified model of concurrency. Theoretical Computer Science, 96(1), 73-155. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(92)90182-fMeseguer, J. (2012). Twenty years of rewriting logic. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 81(7-8), 721-781. doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2012.06.003Meseguer, J. (2017). Strict coherence of conditional rewriting modulo axioms. Theoretical Computer Science, 672, 1-35. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2016.12.026J. Meseguer, Generalized rewrite theories and coherence completion, in: [121], 2018, pp. 164–183.Meseguer, J. (2018). Variant-based satisfiability in initial algebras. Science of Computer Programming, 154, 3-41. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2017.09.001Meseguer, J., Goguen, J. A., & Smolka, G. (1989). Order-sorted unification. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 8(4), 383-413. doi:10.1016/s0747-7171(89)80036-7Meseguer, J., & Ölveczky, P. C. (2012). Formalization and correctness of the PALS architectural pattern for distributed real-time systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 451, 1-37. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2012.05.040Meseguer, J., Palomino, M., & Martí-Oliet, N. (2008). Equational abstractions. Theoretical Computer Science, 403(2-3), 239-264. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2008.04.040Meseguer, J., & Roşu, G. (2007). The rewriting logic semantics project. Theoretical Computer Science, 373(3), 213-237. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2006.12.018Meseguer, J., & Roşu, G. (2013). The rewriting logic semantics project: A progress report. Information and Computation, 231, 38-69. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2013.08.004Meseguer, J., & Skeirik, S. (2017). Equational formulas and pattern operations in initial order-sorted algebras. Formal Aspects of Computing, 29(3), 423-452. doi:10.1007/s00165-017-0415-5Meseguer, J., & Thati, P. (2007). Symbolic reachability analysis using narrowing and its application to verification of cryptographic protocols. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 20(1-2), 123-160. doi:10.1007/s10990-007-9000-6C. Olarte, E. Pimentel, C. Rocha, Proving structural properties of sequent systems in rewriting logic, in: [121], 2018, pp. 115–135.Ölveczky, P. C., & Meseguer, J. (2007). Semantics and pragmatics of Real-Time Maude. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 20(1-2), 161-196. doi:10.1007/s10990-007-9001-5Ölveczky, P. C., & Thorvaldsen, S. (2009). Formal modeling, performance estimation, and model checking of wireless sensor network algorithms in Real-Time Maude. Theoretical Computer Science, 410(2-3), 254-280. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2008.09.022Rocha, C., Meseguer, J., & Muñoz, C. (2017). Rewriting modulo SMT and open system analysis. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, 86(1), 269-297. doi:10.1016/j.jlamp.2016.10.001Şerbănuţă, T. F., Roşu, G., & Meseguer, J. (2009). A rewriting logic approach to operational semantics. Information and Computation, 207(2), 305-340. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2008.03.026Skeirik, S., & Meseguer, J. (2018). Metalevel algorithms for variant satisfiability. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, 96, 81-110. doi:10.1016/j.jlamp.2017.12.006S. Skeirik, A. Ştefănescu, J. Meseguer, A constructor-based reachability logic for rewrite theories, in: [61], 2018, pp. 201–217.Strachey, C. (2000). Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 13(1/2), 11-49. doi:10.1023/a:1010000313106A. Ştefănescu, S. Ciobâcă, R. Mereuta, B.M. Moore, T. Serbanuta, G. Roşu, All-path reachability logic, in: [36], 2014, pp. 425–440.Tushkanova, E., Giorgetti, A., Ringeissen, C., & Kouchnarenko, O. (2015). A rule-based system for automatic decidability and combinability. Science of Computer Programming, 99, 3-23. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.02.00

An Optimizing Protocol Transformation for Constructor Finite Variant Theories in Maude-NPA

[EN] Maude-NPA is an analysis tool for cryptographic security protocols that takes into account the algebraic properties of the cryptosystem. Maude-NPA can reason about a wide range of cryptographic properties. However, some algebraic properties, and protocols using them, have been beyond Maude-NPA capabilities, either because the cryptographic properties cannot be expressed using its equational unification features or because the state space is unmanageable. In this paper, we provide a protocol transformation that can safely get rid of cryptographic properties under some conditions. The time and space difference between verifying the protocol with all the crypto properties and verifying the protocol with a minimal set of the crypto properties is remarkable. We also provide, for the first time, an encoding of the theory of bilinear pairing into Maude-NPA that goes beyond the encoding of bilinear pairing available in the Tamarin toolPartially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the Spanish MCIU under grant RTI2018-094403-B-C32, by the Spanish Generalitat Valenciana under grant PROMETEO/2019/098, and by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research under award number FA9550-17-1-0286. Julia Sapiña has been supported by the Generalitat Valenciana APOSTD/2019/127 grantAparicio-Sánchez, D.; Escobar Román, S.; Gutiérrez Gil, R.; Sapiña-Sanchis, J. (2020). An Optimizing Protocol Transformation for Constructor Finite Variant Theories in Maude-NPA. Springer Nature. 230-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59013-0_12S230250Maude-NPA manual v3.1. http://maude.cs.illinois.edu/w/index.php/Maude_Tools:_Maude-NPAThe Tamarin-Prover Manual, 4 June 2019. https://tamarin-prover.github.io/manual/tex/tamarin-manual.pdfAl-Riyami, S.S., Paterson, K.G.: Tripartite authenticated key agreement protocols from pairings. In: Paterson, K.G. (ed.) Cryptography and Coding 2003. LNCS, vol. 2898, pp. 332–359. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-40974-8_27Baader, F., Snyder, W.: Unification theory. In: Robinson, J.A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, vol. 1, pp. 447–533. Elsevier Science (2001)Baelde, D., Delaune, S., Gazeau, I., Kremer, S.: Symbolic verification of privacy-type properties for security protocols with XOR. In: 30th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium, CSF 2017, pp. 234–248. IEEE Computer Society (2017)Blanchet, B.: Modeling and verifying security protocols with the applied pi calculus and ProVerif. Found. Trends Privacy Secur. 1(1–2), 1–135 (2016)Clavel, M., et al.: Maude manual (version 3.0). Technical report, SRI International, Computer Science Laboratory (2020). http://maude.cs.uiuc.eduComon-Lundh, H., Delaune, S.: The finite variant property: how to get rid of some algebraic properties. In: Giesl, J. (ed.) RTA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3467, pp. 294–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32033-3_22Cremers, C.J.F.: The scyther tool: verification, falsification, and analysis of security protocols. In: Gupta, A., Malik, S. (eds.) CAV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5123, pp. 414–418. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70545-1_38Dreier, J., Duménil, C., Kremer, S., Sasse, R.: Beyond subterm-convergent equational theories in automated verification of stateful protocols. In: Maffei, M., Ryan, M. (eds.) POST 2017. LNCS, vol. 10204, pp. 117–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54455-6_6Escobar, S., Hendrix, J., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J.: Diffie-Hellman cryptographic reasoning in the Maude-NRL protocol analyzer. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Security and Rewriting Techniques (SecReT 2007) (2007)Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J.: A rewriting-based inference system for the NRL protocol analyzer and its meta-logical properties. Theor. Comput. Sci. 367(1–2), 162–202 (2006)Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J.: Maude-NPA: cryptographic protocol analysis modulo equational properties. In: Aldini, A., Barthe, G., Gorrieri, R. (eds.) FOSAD 2007-2009. LNCS, vol. 5705, pp. 1–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03829-7_1Escobar, S., et al.: Protocol analysis in Maude-NPA using unification modulo homomorphic encryption. In: Proceedings of PPDP 2011, pp. 65–76. ACM (2011)Escobar, S., Meadows, C.A., Meseguer, J., Santiago, S.: State space reduction in the Maude-NRL protocol analyzer. Inf. Comput. 238, 157–186 (2014)Escobar, S., Sasse, R., Meseguer, J.: Folding variant narrowing and optimal variant termination. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 81(7–8), 898–928 (2012)Fabrega, F.J.T., Herzog, J.C., Guttman, J.D.: Strand spaces: why is a security protocol correct? In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 160–171 (1998)Guttman, J.D.: Security goals and protocol transformations. In: Mödersheim, S., Palamidessi, C. (eds.) TOSCA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6993, pp. 130–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27375-9_8Joux, A.: A one round protocol for tripartite Diffie-Hellman. In: Bosma, W. (ed.) ANTS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1838, pp. 385–393. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/10722028_23Kim, Y., Perrig, A., Tsudik, G.: Communication-efficient group key agreement. In: Dupuy, M., Paradinas, P. (eds.) SEC 2001. IIFIP, vol. 65, pp. 229–244. Springer, Boston, MA (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46998-7_16Küsters, R., Truderung, T.: Using ProVerif to analyze protocols with Diffie-Hellman exponentiation. In: IEEE Computer Security Foundations, pp. 157–171 (2009)Küsters, R., Truderung, T.: Reducing protocol analysis with XOR to the XOR-free case in the horn theory based approach. J. Autom. Reason. 46(3–4), 325–352 (2011)Meadows, C.: The NRL protocol analyzer: an overview. J. Logic Program. 26(2), 113–131 (1996)Meier, S., Cremers, C., Basin, D.: Strong invariants for the efficient construction of machine-checked protocol security proofs. In: 2010 23rd IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium, pp. 231–245 (2010)Meseguer, J.: Conditional rewriting logic as a united model of concurrency. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 96(1), 73–155 (1992)Meseguer, J.: Variant-based satisfiability in initial algebras. Sci. Comput. Program. 154, 3–41 (2018)Meseguer, J.: Generalized rewrite theories, coherence completion, and symbolic methods. J. Log. Algebr. Meth. Program. 110, 100483 (2020)Mödersheim, S., Viganò, L.: The open-source fixed-point model checker for symbolic analysis of security protocols. In: Aldini, A., Barthe, G., Gorrieri, R. (eds.) FOSAD 2007-2009. LNCS, vol. 5705, pp. 166–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03829-7_6Sasse, R., Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J.: Protocol analysis modulo combination of theories: a case study in Maude-NPA. In: Cuellar, J., Lopez, J., Barthe, G., Pretschner, A. (eds.) STM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6710, pp. 163–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22444-7_11Schmidt, B., Sasse, R., Cremers, C., Basin, D.A.: Automated verification of group key agreement protocols. In: 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2014, pp. 179–194. IEEE Computer Society (2014)Skeirik, S., Meseguer, J.: Metalevel algorithms for variant satisfiability. J. Log. Algebraic Methods Program. 96, 81–110 (2018)TeReSe: Term Rewriting Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Yang, F., Escobar, S., Meadows, C.A., Meseguer, J., Narendran, P.: Theories of homomorphic encryption, unification, and the finite variant property. In: Proceedings of PPDP 2014, pp. 123–133. ACM (2014