232 research outputs found
Multiagent Maximum Coverage Problems: The Trade-off Between Anarchy and Stability
The price of anarchy and price of stability are three well-studied
performance metrics that seek to characterize the inefficiency of equilibria in
distributed systems. The distinction between these two performance metrics
centers on the equilibria that they focus on: the price of anarchy
characterizes the quality of the worst-performing equilibria, while the price
of stability characterizes the quality of the best-performing equilibria. While
much of the literature focuses on these metrics from an analysis perspective,
in this work we consider these performance metrics from a design perspective.
Specifically, we focus on the setting where a system operator is tasked with
designing local utility functions to optimize these performance metrics in a
class of games termed covering games. Our main result characterizes a
fundamental trade-off between the price of anarchy and price of stability in
the form of a fully explicit Pareto frontier. Within this setup, optimizing the
price of anarchy comes directly at the expense of the price of stability (and
vice versa). Our second results demonstrates how a system-operator could
incorporate an additional piece of system-level information into the design of
the agents' utility functions to breach these limitations and improve the
system's performance. This valuable piece of system-level information pertains
to the performance of worst performing agent in the system.Comment: 14 pages, 4 figure
Utility Design for Distributed Resource Allocation -- Part I: Characterizing and Optimizing the Exact Price of Anarchy
Game theory has emerged as a fruitful paradigm for the design of networked
multiagent systems. A fundamental component of this approach is the design of
agents' utility functions so that their self-interested maximization results in
a desirable collective behavior. In this work we focus on a well-studied class
of distributed resource allocation problems where each agent is requested to
select a subset of resources with the goal of optimizing a given system-level
objective. Our core contribution is the development of a novel framework to
tightly characterize the worst case performance of any resulting Nash
equilibrium (price of anarchy) as a function of the chosen agents' utility
functions. Leveraging this result, we identify how to design such utilities so
as to optimize the price of anarchy through a tractable linear program. This
provides us with a priori performance certificates applicable to any existing
learning algorithm capable of driving the system to an equilibrium. Part II of
this work specializes these results to submodular and supermodular objectives,
discusses the complexity of computing Nash equilibria, and provides multiple
illustrations of the theoretical findings.Comment: 15 pages, 5 figure
Competing for shelf space
This paper studies competition for shelf space in a multi-supplier retail point. We consider a retailer that seeks to allocate her shelf space to maximize her profit. Because products associated with larger profit margin are granted more shelf space, suppliers can offer the retailer financial incentives to obtain larger space allocations. We analyze the competitive dynamics arising from the scarcity of space, and show existence and uniqueness of equilibrium. We then demonstrate that the inefficiencies from decentralizing decision-making are limited to 6% with wholesale-price contracts, and that full coordination can be achieved with pay-to-stay fee contracts. We finally investigate how competition is distorted under the practice of category management.Game theory; Supply chain competition; Price of Anarchy; Pricing; Supply contracts;
Distributed Flow Scheduling in an Unknown Environment
Flow scheduling tends to be one of the oldest and most stubborn problems in
networking. It becomes more crucial in the next generation network, due to fast
changing link states and tremendous cost to explore the global structure. In
such situation, distributed algorithms often dominate. In this paper, we design
a distributed virtual game to solve the flow scheduling problem and then
generalize it to situations of unknown environment, where online learning
schemes are utilized. In the virtual game, we use incentives to stimulate
selfish users to reach a Nash Equilibrium Point which is valid based on the
analysis of the `Price of Anarchy'. In the unknown-environment generalization,
our ultimate goal is the minimization of cost in the long run. In order to
achieve balance between exploration of routing cost and exploitation based on
limited information, we model this problem based on Multi-armed Bandit Scenario
and combined newly proposed DSEE with the virtual game design. Armed with these
powerful tools, we find a totally distributed algorithm to ensure the
logarithmic growing of regret with time, which is optimum in classic
Multi-armed Bandit Problem. Theoretical proof and simulation results both
affirm this claim. To our knowledge, this is the first research to combine
multi-armed bandit with distributed flow scheduling.Comment: 10 pages, 3 figures, conferenc
- …