5,123 research outputs found
Scaling Monte Carlo Tree Search on Intel Xeon Phi
Many algorithms have been parallelized successfully on the Intel Xeon Phi
coprocessor, especially those with regular, balanced, and predictable data
access patterns and instruction flows. Irregular and unbalanced algorithms are
harder to parallelize efficiently. They are, for instance, present in
artificial intelligence search algorithms such as Monte Carlo Tree Search
(MCTS). In this paper we study the scaling behavior of MCTS, on a highly
optimized real-world application, on real hardware. The Intel Xeon Phi allows
shared memory scaling studies up to 61 cores and 244 hardware threads. We
compare work-stealing (Cilk Plus and TBB) and work-sharing (FIFO scheduling)
approaches. Interestingly, we find that a straightforward thread pool with a
work-sharing FIFO queue shows the best performance. A crucial element for this
high performance is the controlling of the grain size, an approach that we call
Grain Size Controlled Parallel MCTS. Our subsequent comparing with the Xeon
CPUs shows an even more comprehensible distinction in performance between
different threading libraries. We achieve, to the best of our knowledge, the
fastest implementation of a parallel MCTS on the 61 core Intel Xeon Phi using a
real application (47 relative to a sequential run).Comment: 8 pages, 9 figure
Hybrid static/dynamic scheduling for already optimized dense matrix factorization
We present the use of a hybrid static/dynamic scheduling strategy of the task
dependency graph for direct methods used in dense numerical linear algebra.
This strategy provides a balance of data locality, load balance, and low
dequeue overhead. We show that the usage of this scheduling in communication
avoiding dense factorization leads to significant performance gains. On a 48
core AMD Opteron NUMA machine, our experiments show that we can achieve up to
64% improvement over a version of CALU that uses fully dynamic scheduling, and
up to 30% improvement over the version of CALU that uses fully static
scheduling. On a 16-core Intel Xeon machine, our hybrid static/dynamic
scheduling approach is up to 8% faster than the version of CALU that uses a
fully static scheduling or fully dynamic scheduling. Our algorithm leads to
speedups over the corresponding routines for computing LU factorization in well
known libraries. On the 48 core AMD NUMA machine, our best implementation is up
to 110% faster than MKL, while on the 16 core Intel Xeon machine, it is up to
82% faster than MKL. Our approach also shows significant speedups compared with
PLASMA on both of these systems
- …