Learning static spectral weightings for speech intelligibility enhancement in noise

Near-end speech enhancement works by modifying speech prior to presentation in a noisy environment, typically operating under a constraint of limited or no increase in speech level. One issue is the extent to which near-end enhancement techniques require detailed estimates of the masking environment to function effectively. The current study investigated speech modification strategies based on reallocating energy statically across the spectrum using masker-specific spectral weightings. Weighting patterns were learned offline by maximising a glimpse-based objective intelligibility metric. Keyword scores in sentences in the presence of stationary and fluctuating maskers increased, in some cases by very substantial amounts, following the application of masker- and SNR-specific spectral weighting. A second experiment using generic masker-independent spectral weightings that boosted all frequencies above 1 kHz also led to significant gains in most conditions. These findings indicate that energy-neutral spectral weighting is a highly-effective near-end speech enhancement approach that places minimal demands on detailed masker estimation

Background adaptation for improved listening experience in broadcasting

The intelligibility of speech in noise can be improved by modifying the speech. But with object-based audio, there is the possibility of altering the background sound while leaving the speech unaltered. This may prove a less intrusive approach, affording good speech intelligibility without overly compromising the perceived sound quality. In this study, the technique of spectral weighting was applied to the background. The frequency-dependent weightings for adaptation were learnt by maximising a weighted combination of two perceptual objective metrics for speech intelligibility and audio quality. The balance between the two objective metrics was determined by the perceptual relationship between intelligibility and quality. A neural network was trained to provide a fast solution for real-time processing. Tested in a variety of background sounds and speech-to-background ratios (SBRs), the proposed method led to a large intelligibility gain over the unprocessed baseline. Compared to an approach using constant weightings, the proposed method was able to dynamically preserve the overall audio quality better with respect to SBR changes

The listening talker: A review of human and algorithmic context-induced modifications of speech

International audienceSpeech output technology is finding widespread application, including in scenarios where intelligibility might be compromised - at least for some listeners - by adverse conditions. Unlike most current algorithms, talkers continually adapt their speech patterns as a response to the immediate context of spoken communication, where the type of interlocutor and the environment are the dominant situational factors influencing speech production. Observations of talker behaviour can motivate the design of more robust speech output algorithms. Starting with a listener-oriented categorisation of possible goals for speech modification, this review article summarises the extensive set of behavioural findings related to human speech modification, identifies which factors appear to be beneficial, and goes on to examine previous computational attempts to improve intelligibility in noise. The review concludes by tabulating 46 speech modifications, many of which have yet to be perceptually or algorithmically evaluated. Consequently, the review provides a roadmap for future work in improving the robustness of speech output

A study on the relationship between the intelligibility and quality of algorithmically-modified speech for normal hearing listeners

This study investigates the relationship between the intelligibility and quality of modified speech in noise and in quiet. Speech signals were processed by seven algorithms designed to increase speech intelligibility in noise without altering speech intensity. In three noise maskers, including both stationary and fluctuating noise at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), listeners identified keywords from unmodified or modified sentences. The intelligibility performance of each type of speech was measured as the listeners’ word recognition rate in each condition, while the quality was rated as a mean opinion score. In quiet, only the perceptual quality of each type of speech was assessed. The results suggest that when listening in noise, modification performance on improving intelligibility is more important than its potential negative impact on speech quality. However, when listening in quiet or at SNRs in which intelligibility is no longer an issue to listeners, the impact to speech quality due to modification becomes a concern

Evaluating the predictions of objective intelligibility metrics for modified and synthetic speech

Several modification algorithms that alter natural or synthetic speech with the goal of improving intelligibility in noise have been proposed recently. A key requirement of many modification techniques is the ability to predict intelligibility, both offline during algorithm development, and online, in order to determine the optimal modification for the current noise context. While existing objective intelligibility metrics (OIMs) have good predictive power for unmodified natural speech in stationary and fluctuating noise, little is known about their effectiveness for other forms of speech. The current study evaluated how well seven OIMs predict listener responses in three large datasets of modified and synthetic speech which together represent 396 combinations of speech modification, masker type and signal-to-noise ratio. The chief finding is a clear reduction in predictive power for most OIMs when faced with modified and synthetic speech. Modifications introducing durational changes are particularly harmful to intelligibility predictors. OIMs that measure masked audibility tend to over-estimate intelligibility in the presence of fluctuating maskers relative to stationary maskers, while OIMs that estimate the distortion caused by the masker to a clean speech prototype exhibit the reverse pattern

A non-intrusive method for estimating binaural speech intelligibility from noise-corrupted signals captured by a pair of microphones

A non-intrusive method is introduced to predict binaural speech intelligibility in noise directly from signals captured using a pair of microphones. The approach combines signal processing techniques in blind source separation and localisation, with an intrusive objective intelligibility measure (OIM). Therefore, unlike classic intrusive OIMs, this method does not require a clean reference speech signal and knowing the location of the sources to operate. The proposed approach is able to estimate intelligibility in stationary and fluctuating noises, when the noise masker is presented as a point or diffused source, and is spatially separated from the target speech source on a horizontal plane. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated in two rooms. When predicting subjective intelligibility measured as word recognition rate, this method showed reasonable predictive accuracy with correlation coefficients above 0.82, which is comparable to that of a reference intrusive OIM in most of the conditions. The proposed approach offers a solution for fast binaural intelligibility prediction, and therefore has practical potential to be deployed in situations where on-site speech intelligibility is a concern

Mask-based enhancement of very noisy speech

When speech is contaminated by high levels of additive noise, both its perceptual quality and its intelligibility are reduced. Studies show that conventional approaches to speech enhancement are able to improve quality but not intelligibility. However, in recent years, algorithms that estimate a time-frequency mask from noisy speech using a supervised machine learning approach and then apply this mask to the noisy speech have been shown to be capable of improving intelligibility. The most direct way of measuring intelligibility is to carry out listening tests with human test subjects. However, in situations where listening tests are impractical and where some additional uncertainty in the results is permissible, for example during the development phase of a speech enhancer, intrusive intelligibility metrics can provide an alternative to listening tests. This thesis begins by outlining a new intrusive intelligibility metric, WSTOI, that is a development of the existing STOI metric. WSTOI improves STOI by weighting the intelligibility contributions of different time-frequency regions with an estimate of their intelligibility content. The prediction accuracies of WSTOI and STOI are compared for a range of noises and noise suppression algorithms and it is found that WSTOI outperforms STOI in all tested conditions. The thesis then investigates the best choice of mask-estimation algorithm, target mask, and method of applying the estimated mask. A new target mask, the HSWOBM, is proposed that optimises a modified version of WSTOI with a higher frequency resolution. The HSWOBM is optimised for a stochastic noise signal to encourage a mask estimator trained on the HSWOBM to generalise better to unseen noise conditions. A high frequency resolution version of WSTOI is optimised as this gives improvements in predicted quality compared with optimising WSTOI. Of the tested approaches to target mask estimation, the best-performing approach uses a feed-forward neural network with a loss function based on WSTOI. The best-performing feature set is based on the gains produced by a classical speech enhancer and an estimate of the local voiced-speech-plus-noise to noise ratio in different time-frequency regions, which is obtained with the aid of a pitch estimator. When the estimated target mask is applied in the conventional way, by multiplying the speech by the mask in the time-frequency domain, it can result in speech with very poor perceptual quality. The final chapter of this thesis therefore investigates alternative approaches to applying the estimated mask to the noisy speech, in order to improve both intelligibility and quality. An approach is developed that uses the mask to supply prior information about the speech presence probability to a classical speech enhancer that minimises the expected squared error in the log spectral amplitudes. The proposed end-to-end enhancer outperforms existing algorithms in terms of predicted quality and intelligibility for most noise types.Open Acces