3,524 research outputs found
Optimality Theory as a Framework for Lexical Acquisition
This paper re-investigates a lexical acquisition system initially developed
for French.We show that, interestingly, the architecture of the system
reproduces and implements the main components of Optimality Theory. However, we
formulate the hypothesis that some of its limitations are mainly due to a poor
representation of the constraints used. Finally, we show how a better
representation of the constraints used would yield better results
The optimality of attaching unlinked labels to unlinked meanings
Vocabulary learning by children can be characterized by many biases. When encountering a
new word, children as well as adults, are biased towards assuming that it means something totally
different from the words that they already know. To the best of our knowledge, the 1st mathematical
proof of the optimality of this bias is presented here. First, it is shown that this bias is a particular case of the maximization of mutual information between words and meanings. Second, the optimality is proven within a more general information theoretic framework where mutual information maximization competes with other information theoretic principles. The bias is a prediction from modern information theory. The relationship between information theoretic principles and the principles of contrast and mutual exclusivity is also shown.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version
Modelling the formation of phonotactic restrictions across the mental lexicon
Experimental data shows that adult learners of an artificial language with a phonotactic restriction learned this restriction better when being trained on word types (e.g. when they were presented with 80 different words twice each) than when being trained on word tokens (e.g. when presented with 40 different words four times each) (Hamann & Ernestus submitted). These findings support Pierrehumbert’s (2003) observation that phonotactic co-occurrence restrictions are formed across lexical entries, since only lexical levels of representation can be sensitive to type frequencies
What variational linguistics can learn from Galician
This short overview reviews, in the first part, some of the most important fields of investigation where studies on Galician have contributed to variational linguistics, including macro- and micro-sociolinguistic studies (sections 1-3). The second part (sections 4-7) postulates some possible theoretical and empirical areas which we recommend to be included in future research. We propose a critical application of new models of linguistic variation, including recent frameworks such as studies on grammaticalisation, OT, intonational phonology, etc., but also call for the inclusion of established insights into language variation common in the European tradition. The high concentration of research institutions and the strongly dynamic situation of contemporary Galician could serve as an empirical touchstone for these theoretical frameworks, and Galician linguistics should apply them in a critical, flexible and creative way. This means that research on Galician will not only learn from theory but also contribute to it. We also briefly mention some of the areas where the studies of Galician have already contributed some important results to an overall perspective on linguistic variation
Introduction
This chapter will motivate why it is useful to consider the topic of derivations
and filtering in more detail. We will argue against the popular belief that
the minimalist program and optimality theory are incompatible theories in that the
former places the explanatory burden on the generative device (the computational
system) whereas the latter places it on the fi ltering device (the OT evaluator).
Although this belief may be correct in as far as it describes existing tendencies,
we will argue that minimalist and optimality theoretic approaches normally adopt
more or less the same global architecture of grammar: both assume that a generator
defines a set S of potentially well-formed expressions that can be generated on the
basis of a given input and that there is an evaluator that selects the expressions from
S that are actually grammatical in a given language L. For this reason, we believe
that it has a high priority to investigate the role of the two components in more detail
in the hope that this will provide a better understanding of the differences and similarities
between the two approaches. We will conclude this introduction with a brief
review of the studies collected in this book.
Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model
Abstract. A weakness of standard Optimality Theory is its inability to account for grammar
The evolution of auditory contrast
This paper reconciles the standpoint that language users do not aim at improving their sound systems with the observation that languages seem to improve their sound systems. Computer simulations of inventories of sibilants show that Optimality-Theoretic learners who optimize their perception grammars automatically introduce a so-called prototype effect, i.e. the phenomenon that the learner’s preferred auditory realization of a certain phonological category is more peripheral than the average auditory realization of this category in her language environment. In production, however, this prototype effect is counteracted by an articulatory effect that limits the auditory form to something that is not too difficult to pronounce. If the prototype effect and the articulatory effect are of a different size, the learner must end up with an auditorily different sound system from that of her language environment. The computer simulations show that, independently of the initial auditory sound system, a stable equilibrium is reached within a small number of generations. In this stable state, the dispersion of the sibilants of the language strikes an optimal balance between articulatory ease and auditory contrast. The important point is that this is derived within a model without any goal-oriented elements such as dispersion constraints
Remarks on the architecture of OT syntax grammars
This paper argues for a particular architecture of OT syntax. This architecture hasthree core features: i) it is bidirectional, the usual production-oriented optimisation (called ‘first optimisation’ here) is accompanied by a second step that checks the recoverability of an underlying form; ii) this underlying form already contains a full-fledged syntactic specification; iii) especially the procedure checking for recoverability makes crucial use of semantic and pragmatic factors. The first section motivates the basic architecture. The second section shows with two examples, how contextual factors are integrated. The third section examines its implications for learning theory, and the fourth section concludes with a broader discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed model
- …