673 research outputs found

    The envirome and the connectome: exploring the structural noise in the human brain associated with socioeconomic deprivation

    Get PDF
    Complex cognitive functions are widely recognized to be the result of a number of brain regions working together as large-scale networks. Recently, complex network analysis has been used to characterize various structural properties of the large scale network organization of the brain. For example, the human brain has been found to have a modular architecture i.e. regions within the network form communities (modules) with more connections between regions within the community compared to regions outside it. The aim of this study was to examine the modular and overlapping modular architecture of the brain networks using complex network analysis. We also examined the association between neighborhood level deprivation and brain network structure – modularity and grey nodes. We compared network structure derived from anatomical MRI scans of 42 middle-aged neurologically healthy men from the least (LD) and the most deprived (MD) neighborhoods of Glasgow with their corresponding random networks. Cortical morphological covariance networks were constructed from the cortical thickness derived from the MRI scans of the brain. For a given modularity threshold, networks derived from the MD group showed similar number of modules compared to their corresponding random networks, while networks derived from the LD group had more modules compared to their corresponding random networks. The MD group also had fewer grey nodes – a measure of overlapping modular structure. These results suggest that apparent structural difference in brain networks may be driven by differences in cortical thicknesses between groups. This demonstrates a structural organization that is consistent with a system that is less robust and less efficient in information processing. These findings provide some evidence of the relationship between socioeconomic deprivation and brain network topology

    Modeling Structural Brain Connectivity

    Get PDF

    Spatial parcellations, spectral filtering, and connectivity measures in fMRI: Optimizing for discrimination.

    Get PDF
    The analysis of Functional Connectivity (FC) is a key technique of fMRI, having been used to distinguish brain states and conditions. While many approaches to calculating FC are available, there have been few assessments of their differences, making it difficult to choose approaches and compare results. Here, we assess the impact of methodological choices on discriminability, using a fully controlled dataset of continuous active states involving basic visual and motor tasks, providing robust localized FC changes. We tested a range of anatomical and functional parcellations, including the AAL atlas, parcellations derived from the Human Connectome Project and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) of many dimensionalities. We measure amplitude, covariance, correlation and regularized partial correlation under different temporal filtering choices. We evaluate features derived from these methods for discriminating states using MVPA. We find that multidimensional parcellations derived from functional data performed similarly, outperforming an anatomical atlas, with correlation and partial correlation (p<0.05, FDR). Partial correlation, with appropriate regularization, outperformed correlation. Amplitude and covariance generally discriminated less well, although gave good results with high-dimensionality ICA. We found that discriminative FC properties are frequency specific; higher frequencies performed surprisingly well under certain configurations of atlas choices and dependency measures, with ICA-based parcellations revealing greater discriminability at high frequencies compared to other parcellations. Methodological choices in FC analyses can have a profound impact on results and can be selected to optimize accuracy, interpretability, and sharing of results. This work contributes to a basis for consistent selection of approaches to estimating and analyzing FC

    Navigation of brain networks

    Get PDF
    Understanding the mechanisms of neural communication in large-scale brain networks remains a major goal in neuroscience. We investigated whether navigation is a parsimonious routing model for connectomics. Navigating a network involves progressing to the next node that is closest in distance to a desired destination. We developed a measure to quantify navigation efficiency and found that connectomes in a range of mammalian species (human, mouse and macaque) can be successfully navigated with near-optimal efficiency (>80% of optimal efficiency for typical connection densities). Rewiring network topology or repositioning network nodes resulted in 45%-60% reductions in navigation performance. Specifically, we found that brain networks cannot be progressively rewired (randomized or clusterized) to result in topologies with significantly improved navigation performance. Navigation was also found to: i) promote a resource-efficient distribution of the information traffic load, potentially relieving communication bottlenecks; and, ii) explain significant variation in functional connectivity. Unlike prevalently studied communication strategies in connectomics, navigation does not mandate biologically unrealistic assumptions about global knowledge of network topology. We conclude that the wiring and spatial embedding of brain networks is conducive to effective decentralized communication. Graph-theoretic studies of the connectome should consider measures of network efficiency and centrality that are consistent with decentralized models of neural communication

    Using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging and tracts constrained by underlying anatomy to differentiate between subjects along the Alzheimer's disease continuum

    Full text link
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the involvement of the white matter of the brain in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Using Neurite Orientation Density and Dispersion Imaging (NODDI) and the probabilistic white matter parcellation tool Tracula as a means for understanding whether alterations in the white matter underlie changes in perceived cognitive abilities across the spectrum from health aging to Alzheimer’s disease. METHOD: Data were obtained from 28 participants in the Health Outreach Program for the Elderly (HOPE) at the Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Center (BU ADC) Clinical Core Registry. MRI scans included an MPRAGE T1 scan, multi-b shell diffusion scan and a High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging scan (HARDI). Scans were processed with Freesurfer v6.0 and the NODDI Python2.7 toolkit. The resulting data included the orientation dispersion index (ODI) and Fractional Anisotropy (FA) values for cortical and subcortical regions in the DKT atlas space as well as specific Tracts Constrained by Underlying Anatomy (TRACULA) measurements for 18 specific established white matter tracts. Statistical models using measures of pathway integrity (FA and ODI data) were used to assess relationships with Informant Cognitive Change Index (ICCI), self-described Cognitive Change Index (CCI), and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) values. RESULTS: Measures of white matter integrity within several tracts predicted ICCI and CDR well in statistical models. FA and ODI values of the bilateral superior longitudinal fasciculi, inferior longitudinal fasciculi, and the cingulum bundle tracts were all related to ICCI and CDR. None of the known tracts’ FA or ODI values were related to CCI. CONCLUSIONS: Measures of white matter pathway integrity were predictive of ICCI and CDR scores but not CCI. These finding support the notion that self-report of cognitive abilities may be compromised by alterations in insight and reinforce the need for informed study partners and clinical ratings to evaluate potential MCI and AD
    • …
    corecore