55 research outputs found
From the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm to a Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz
The next few years will be exciting as prototype universal quantum processors
emerge, enabling implementation of a wider variety of algorithms. Of particular
interest are quantum heuristics, which require experimentation on quantum
hardware for their evaluation, and which have the potential to significantly
expand the breadth of quantum computing applications. A leading candidate is
Farhi et al.'s Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, which alternates
between applying a cost-function-based Hamiltonian and a mixing Hamiltonian.
Here, we extend this framework to allow alternation between more general
families of operators. The essence of this extension, the Quantum Alternating
Operator Ansatz, is the consideration of general parametrized families of
unitaries rather than only those corresponding to the time-evolution under a
fixed local Hamiltonian for a time specified by the parameter. This ansatz
supports the representation of a larger, and potentially more useful, set of
states than the original formulation, with potential long-term impact on a
broad array of application areas. For cases that call for mixing only within a
desired subspace, refocusing on unitaries rather than Hamiltonians enables more
efficiently implementable mixers than was possible in the original framework.
Such mixers are particularly useful for optimization problems with hard
constraints that must always be satisfied, defining a feasible subspace, and
soft constraints whose violation we wish to minimize. More efficient
implementation enables earlier experimental exploration of an alternating
operator approach to a wide variety of approximate optimization, exact
optimization, and sampling problems. Here, we introduce the Quantum Alternating
Operator Ansatz, lay out design criteria for mixing operators, detail mappings
for eight problems, and provide brief descriptions of mappings for diverse
problems.Comment: 51 pages, 2 figures. Revised to match journal pape
Recommended from our members
When almost is not even close: Remarks on the approximability of HDTP
A growing number of researchers in Cognitive Science advocate the thesis that human cognitive capacities are constrained by computational tractability. If right, this thesis also can be expected to have far-reaching consequences for work in Artificial General Intelligence: Models and systems considered as basis for the development of general cognitive architectures with human-like performance would also have to comply with tractability constraints, making in-depth complexity theoretic analysis a necessary and important part of the standard research and development cycle already from a rather early stage. In this paper we present an application case study for such an analysis based on results from a parametrized complexity and approximation theoretic analysis of the Heuristic Driven Theory Projection (HDTP) analogy-making framework
Complexity of coalition structure generation
We revisit the coalition structure generation problem in which the goal is to
partition the players into exhaustive and disjoint coalitions so as to maximize
the social welfare. One of our key results is a general polynomial-time
algorithm to solve the problem for all coalitional games provided that player
types are known and the number of player types is bounded by a constant. As a
corollary, we obtain a polynomial-time algorithm to compute an optimal
partition for weighted voting games with a constant number of weight values and
for coalitional skill games with a constant number of skills. We also consider
well-studied and well-motivated coalitional games defined compactly on
combinatorial domains. For these games, we characterize the complexity of
computing an optimal coalition structure by presenting polynomial-time
algorithms, approximation algorithms, or NP-hardness and inapproximability
lower bounds.Comment: 17 page
Inapproximability of Maximum Biclique Problems, Minimum -Cut and Densest At-Least--Subgraph from the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis
The Small Set Expansion Hypothesis (SSEH) is a conjecture which roughly
states that it is NP-hard to distinguish between a graph with a small subset of
vertices whose edge expansion is almost zero and one in which all small subsets
of vertices have expansion almost one. In this work, we prove inapproximability
results for the following graph problems based on this hypothesis:
- Maximum Edge Biclique (MEB): given a bipartite graph , find a complete
bipartite subgraph of with maximum number of edges.
- Maximum Balanced Biclique (MBB): given a bipartite graph , find a
balanced complete bipartite subgraph of with maximum number of vertices.
- Minimum -Cut: given a weighted graph , find a set of edges with
minimum total weight whose removal partitions into connected
components.
- Densest At-Least--Subgraph (DALS): given a weighted graph , find a
set of at least vertices such that the induced subgraph on has
maximum density (the ratio between the total weight of edges and the number of
vertices).
We show that, assuming SSEH and NP BPP, no polynomial time
algorithm gives -approximation for MEB or MBB for every
constant . Moreover, assuming SSEH, we show that it is NP-hard
to approximate Minimum -Cut and DALS to within factor
of the optimum for every constant .
The ratios in our results are essentially tight since trivial algorithms give
-approximation to both MEB and MBB and efficient -approximation
algorithms are known for Minimum -Cut [SV95] and DALS [And07, KS09].
Our first result is proved by combining a technique developed by Raghavendra
et al. [RST12] to avoid locality of gadget reductions with a generalization of
Bansal and Khot's long code test [BK09] whereas our second result is shown via
elementary reductions.Comment: A preliminary version of this work will appear at ICALP 2017 under a
different title "Inapproximability of Maximum Edge Biclique, Maximum Balanced
Biclique and Minimum k-Cut from the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis
Inapproximability of Combinatorial Optimization Problems
We survey results on the hardness of approximating combinatorial optimization
problems
- …