Closed on-line bin packing

An optimal algorithm for the classical bin packing problem partitions (packs) a given set of items with sizes at most 1 into a smallest number of unit-capacity bins such that the sum of the sizes of the items in each bin is at most 1. Approximation algorithms for this NP-hard problem are called on-line if the items are packed sequentially into bins with the bin receiving a given item being independent of the number and sizes of all items as yet unpacked. Off-line algorithms plan packings assuming full (advance) knowledge of all item sizes. The closed on-line algorithms are intermediate: item sizes are not known in advance but the number n of items is. The uniform model, where the n item sizes are independent uniform random draws from [0,1], commands special attention in the average-case analysis of bin packing algorithms. In this model, the expected wasted space produced by an optimal off-line algorithm is Θ(√n), while that produced by an optimal on-line algorithm is Θ(√n log n)- Surprisingly, an optimal closed on-line algorithm also wastes only s Θ(√n) space on the average. A proof of this last result is the principal contribution of this paper. However, we also identify a class of optimal closed algorithms, extend the main result to other probability models, and give an estimate of the hidden constant factor

New Results on the Probabilistic Analysis of Online Bin Packing and its Variants

The classical bin packing problem can be stated as follows: We are given a multiset of items {a1, ..., an} with sizes in [0,1], and want to pack them into a minimum number of bins, each of which with capacity one. There are several applications of this problem, for example in the field of logistics: We can interpret the i-th item as time a package deliverer spends for the i-th tour. Package deliverers have a daily restricted working time, and we want to assign the tours such that the number of package deliverers needed is minimized. Another setup is to think of the items as boxes with a standardized basis, but variable height. Then, the goal is to pack these boxes into a container, which is standardized in all three dimensions. Moreover, applications of variants of the classical bin packing problem arise in cloud computing, when we have to store virtual machines on servers. Besides its practical relevance, the bin packing problem is one of the fundamental problems in theoretical computer science: It was proven many years ago that under standard complexity assumptions it is not possible to compute the value of an optimal packing of the items efficiently - classical bin packing is NP-complete. Computing the value efficiently means that the runtime of the algorithm is bounded polynomially in the number of items we have to pack. Besides the offline version, where we know all items at the beginning, also the online version is of interest: Here, the items are revealed one-by-one and have to be packed into a bin immediately and irrevocably without knowing which and how many items will still arrive in the future. Also this version is of practical relevance. In many situations we do not know the whole input at the beginning: For example we are unaware of the requirements of future virtual machines, which have to be stored, or suddenly some more packages have to be delivered, and some deliverers already started their tour. We can think of the classical theoretical analysis of an online algorithm A as follows: An adversary studies the behavior of the algorithm and afterwards constructs a sequence of items I. Then, the performance is measured by the number of used bins by A performing on I, divided by the value of an optimal packing of the items in I. The adversary tries to choose a worst-case sequence so this way to measure the performance is very pessimistic. Moreover, the chosen sequences I often turn out to be artificial: For example, in many cases the sizes of the items increase monotonically over time. Instances in practice are often subject to random influence and therefore it is likely that they are good-natured. In this thesis we analyze the performance of online algorithms with respect to two stochastic models. The first model is the following: The adversary chooses a set of items SI and a distribution F on SI. Then, the items are drawn independently and identically distributed according to F. In the second model the adversary chooses a finite set of items SI and then these items arrive in random order, that is random with respect to the uniform distribution on the set of all possible permutations of the items. It is possible to show that the adversary in the second stochastic model is at least as powerful as in the first one. We can classify the results in this thesis in three parts: In the first part we consider the complexity of classical bin packing and its variants cardinality-constrained and class-constrained bin packing in both stochastic models. That is, we determine if it is possible to construct algorithms that are in expectation nearly optimal for large instances that are constructed according to the stochastic models or if there exist non-trivial lower bounds. Among other things we show that the complexity of class-constrained bin packing differs in the two models under consideration. In the second part we deal with bounded-space bin packing and the dual maximization variant bin covering. We show that it is possible to overcome classical worst-case bounds in both models. In other words, we see that bounded-space algorithms benefit from randomized instances compared to the worst case. Finally, we consider selected heuristics for class-constrained bin packing and the corresponding maximization variant class-constrained bin covering. Here, we note that the different complexity of class-constrained bin packing with respect to the studied stochastic models observed in the first part is not only a theoretical phenomenon, but also takes place for many common algorithmic approaches. Interestingly, when we apply the same algorithmic ideas to class-constrained bin covering, we benefit from both types of randomization similarly. </ul

Online Bin Covering: Expectations vs. Guarantees

Bin covering is a dual version of classic bin packing. Thus, the goal is to cover as many bins as possible, where covering a bin means packing items of total size at least one in the bin. For online bin covering, competitive analysis fails to distinguish between most algorithms of interest; all "reasonable" algorithms have a competitive ratio of 1/2. Thus, in order to get a better understanding of the combinatorial difficulties in solving this problem, we turn to other performance measures, namely relative worst order, random order, and max/max analysis, as well as analyzing input with restricted or uniformly distributed item sizes. In this way, our study also supplements the ongoing systematic studies of the relative strengths of various performance measures. Two classic algorithms for online bin packing that have natural dual versions are Harmonic and Next-Fit. Even though the algorithms are quite different in nature, the dual versions are not separated by competitive analysis. We make the case that when guarantees are needed, even under restricted input sequences, dual Harmonic is preferable. In addition, we establish quite robust theoretical results showing that if items come from a uniform distribution or even if just the ordering of items is uniformly random, then dual Next-Fit is the right choice.Comment: IMADA-preprint-c

Ant colony optimisation and local search for bin-packing and cutting stock problems

The Bin Packing Problem and the Cutting Stock Problem are two related classes of NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. Exact solution methods can only be used for very small instances, so for real-world problems, we have to rely on heuristic methods. In recent years, researchers have started to apply evolutionary approaches to these problems, including Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Programming. In the work presented here, we used an ant colony optimization (ACO) approach to solve both Bin Packing and Cutting Stock Problems. We present a pure ACO approach, as well as an ACO approach augmented with a simple but very effective local search algorithm. It is shown that the pure ACO approach can compete with existing evolutionary methods, whereas the hybrid approach can outperform the best-known hybrid evolutionary solution methods for certain problem classes. The hybrid ACO approach is also shown to require different parameter values from the pure ACO approach and to give a more robust performance across different problems with a single set of parameter values. The local search algorithm is also run with random restarts and shown to perform significantly worse than when combined with ACO

An average-case analysis of bin packing with uniformly distributed item sizes

We analyze the one-dimensional bin-packing problem under the assumption that bins have unit capacity, and that items to be packed are drawn from a uniform distribution on [0,1]. Building on some recent work by Frederickson, we give an algorithm which uses n/2+0(n^½) bins on the average to pack n items. (Knodel has achieved a similar result.) The analysis involves the use of a certain 1-dimensional random walk. We then show that even an optimum packing under this distribution uses n/2+0(n^1/2) bins on the average, so our algorithm is asymptotically optimal, up to constant factors on the amount of wasted space. Finally, following Frederickson, we show that two well-known greedy bin-packing algorithms use no more bins than our algorithm; thus their behavior is also in asymptotically optimal in this sense