12,812 research outputs found
Learning Opposites with Evolving Rules
The idea of opposition-based learning was introduced 10 years ago. Since then
a noteworthy group of researchers has used some notions of oppositeness to
improve existing optimization and learning algorithms. Among others,
evolutionary algorithms, reinforcement agents, and neural networks have been
reportedly extended into their opposition-based version to become faster and/or
more accurate. However, most works still use a simple notion of opposites,
namely linear (or type- I) opposition, that for each assigns its
opposite as . This, of course, is a very naive estimate of
the actual or true (non-linear) opposite , which has been
called type-II opposite in literature. In absence of any knowledge about a
function that we need to approximate, there seems to be no
alternative to the naivety of type-I opposition if one intents to utilize
oppositional concepts. But the question is if we can receive some level of
accuracy increase and time savings by using the naive opposite estimate
according to all reports in literature, what would we be able to
gain, in terms of even higher accuracies and more reduction in computational
complexity, if we would generate and employ true opposites? This work
introduces an approach to approximate type-II opposites using evolving fuzzy
rules when we first perform opposition mining. We show with multiple examples
that learning true opposites is possible when we mine the opposites from the
training data to subsequently approximate .Comment: Accepted for publication in The 2015 IEEE International Conference on
Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2015), August 2-5, 2015, Istanbul, Turke
Head-on collisions of boson stars
We study head-on collisions of boson stars in three dimensions. We consider
evolutions of two boson stars which may differ in their phase or have opposite
frequencies but are otherwise identical. Our studies show that these phase
differences result in different late time behavior and gravitational wave
output
Spatio-Temporal Patterns for a Generalized Innovation Diffusion Model
We construct a model of innovation diffusion that incorporates a spatial
component into a classical imitation-innovation dynamics first introduced by F.
Bass. Relevant for situations where the imitation process explicitly depends on
the spatial proximity between agents, the resulting nonlinear field dynamics is
exactly solvable. As expected for nonlinear collective dynamics, the imitation
mechanism generates spatio-temporal patterns, possessing here the remarkable
feature that they can be explicitly and analytically discussed. The simplicity
of the model, its intimate connection with the original Bass' modeling
framework and the exact transient solutions offer a rather unique theoretical
stylized framework to describe how innovation jointly develops in space and
time.Comment: 20 pages, 4 figure
The Faculty Notebook, September 2011
The Faculty Notebook is published periodically by the Office of the Provost at Gettysburg College to bring to the attention of the campus community accomplishments and activities of academic interest. Faculty are encouraged to submit materials for consideration for publication to the Associate Provost for Faculty Development. Copies of this publication are available at the Office of the Provost
Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics
The field of fluid mechanics is rapidly advancing, driven by unprecedented
volumes of data from field measurements, experiments and large-scale
simulations at multiple spatiotemporal scales. Machine learning offers a wealth
of techniques to extract information from data that could be translated into
knowledge about the underlying fluid mechanics. Moreover, machine learning
algorithms can augment domain knowledge and automate tasks related to flow
control and optimization. This article presents an overview of past history,
current developments, and emerging opportunities of machine learning for fluid
mechanics. It outlines fundamental machine learning methodologies and discusses
their uses for understanding, modeling, optimizing, and controlling fluid
flows. The strengths and limitations of these methods are addressed from the
perspective of scientific inquiry that considers data as an inherent part of
modeling, experimentation, and simulation. Machine learning provides a powerful
information processing framework that can enrich, and possibly even transform,
current lines of fluid mechanics research and industrial applications.Comment: To appear in the Annual Reviews of Fluid Mechanics, 202
- …