263 research outputs found
Towards An Empirical Theory of Ideologies in the Open Source Software Movement
Encompassing a diverse population of developers, non-technical users,
organizations, and many other stakeholders, open source software (OSS)
development has expanded to broader social movements from the initial product
development aims. Ideology, as a coherent system of ideas, offers value
commitments and normative implications for any social movement, so does OSS
ideology for the open source movement. However, the literature on open source
ideology is often fragile, or lacking in empirical evidence. In this paper, we
sought to develop a comprehensive empirical theory of ideologies in open source
software movement. Following a grounded theory procedure, we collected and
analyzed data from 22 semi-structured interviews and 41 video recordings of
Open Source Initiative (OSI) board members' public speeches. An empirical
theory of OSS ideology emerged in our analysis, with six key categories:
membership, norms/values, goals, activities, resources, and positions/group
relations; each consists of a number of themes and subthemes. We discussed a
subset of carefully selected themes and subthemes in detail based on their
theoretical significance. With this ideological lens, we examined the
implications and insights into open source development, and shed light on the
research into open source as a social-cultural construction in the future
The mad manifesto
The āmad manifestoā project is a multidisciplinary mediated investigation into the circumstances by which mad (mentally ill, neurodivergent) or disabled (disclosed, undisclosed) students faced far more precarious circumstances with inadequate support models while attending North American universities during the pandemic teaching era (2020-2023).
Using a combination of āemergency remote teachingā archival materials such as national student datasets, universal design for learning (UDL) training models, digital classroom teaching experiments, university budgetary releases, educational technology coursewares, and lived experience expertise, this dissertation carefully retells the story of āaccessibilityā as it transpired in disabling classroom containers trapped within intentionally underprepared crisis superstructures. Using rhetorical models derived from critical disability studies, mad studies, social work practice, and health humanities, it then suggests radically collaborative UDL teaching practices that may better pre-empt the dynamic needs of dis/abled students whose needs remain direly underserviced.
The manifesto leaves the reader with discrete calls to action that foster more critical performances of intersectionally inclusive UDL classrooms for North American mad students, which it calls āmad-positiveā facilitation techniques:
1. Seek to untie the bond that regards the digital divide and access as synonyms.
2. UDL practice requires an environment shift that prioritizes change potential.
3. Advocate against the usage of UDL as a for-all keystone of accessibility.
4. Refuse or reduce the use of technologies whose primary mandate is dataveillance.
5. Remind students and allies that university space is a non-neutral affective container.
6. Operationalize the tracking of student suicides on your home campus.
7. Seek out physical & affectual ways that your campus is harming social capital potential.
8. Revise policies and practices that are ability-adjacent imaginings of access.
9. Eliminate sanist and neuroscientific languaging from how you speak about students.
10. Vigilantly interrogate how ānormalā and ābelongā are socially constructed.
11. Treat lived experience expertise as a gift, not a resource to mine and to spend.
12. Create non-psychiatric routes of receiving accommodation requests in your classroom.
13. Seek out uncomfortable stories of mad exclusion and consider carceral logicās role in it.
14. Center madness in inclusive methodologies designed to explicitly resist carceral logics.
15. Create counteraffectual classrooms that anticipate and interrupt kairotic spatial power.
16. Strive to refuse comfort and immediate intelligibility as mandatory classroom presences.
17. Create pathways that empower cozy space understandings of classroom practice.
18. Vector students wherever possible as dynamic ability constellations in assessment
Ceramic Materials for 3D Printing of Biomimetic Bone Scaffolds ā Current stateāofātheāart & Future Perspectives
Ceramic bone implants have potential properties ideal for long-term implantation applications. On comparison with other materials, ceramic biomaterials have advantages such as biocompatibility, low cost, osteoconductivity, osteoinductivity, corrosion resistance, and can be made into various shapes with desired surface properties. Among transplantation surgeries, bone transplantation is the second largest in the globe after blood transfusion which is an indication for rising hope on the potential treatment options for bone. 3D printing is one of the most advanced fabrication techniques to create customized bone implants using materials such as ceramics and their composites. Developing bone scaffolds that precisely recapitulate the mechanical properties and other biological functions of bone remains a major challenge. However, extensive research on ceramic biomaterials have resulted in the successful 3D printing of complex bony designs with >50% porosity with cortical bone mechanical properties. This review critically analyses the use of various 3D printing techniques to fabricate ceramic bone scaffolds. Further, various natural and synthetic ceramic materials for producing customized ceramic implants are discussed along with potential clinical applications. Finally, a list of companies that offer customized 3D printed implants and the future on clinical translation of 3D printed ceramic bone implants are outlined
How Early Participation Determines Long-Term Sustained Activity in GitHub Projects?
Although the open source model bears many advantages in software development,
open source projects are always hard to sustain. Previous research on open
source sustainability mainly focuses on projects that have already reached a
certain level of maturity (e.g., with communities, releases, and downstream
projects). However, limited attention is paid to the development of
(sustainable) open source projects in their infancy, and we believe an
understanding of early sustainability determinants is crucial for project
initiators, incubators, newcomers, and users.
In this paper, we aim to explore the relationship between early participation
factors and long-term project sustainability. We leverage a novel methodology
combining the Blumberg model of performance and machine learning to predict the
sustainability of 290,255 GitHub projects. Specificially, we train an XGBoost
model based on early participation (first three months of activity) in 290,255
GitHub projects and we interpret the model using LIME. We quantitatively show
that early participants have a positive effect on project's future sustained
activity if they have prior experience in OSS project incubation and
demonstrate concentrated focus and steady commitment. Participation from
non-code contributors and detailed contribution documentation also promote
project's sustained activity. Compared with individual projects, building a
community that consists of more experienced core developers and more active
peripheral developers is important for organizational projects. This study
provides unique insights into the incubation and recognition of sustainable
open source projects, and our interpretable prediction approach can also offer
guidance to open source project initiators and newcomers.Comment: The 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and
Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE 2023
University of Windsor Undergraduate Calendar 2023 Spring
https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/universitywindsorundergraduatecalendars/1023/thumbnail.jp
- ā¦