Task scheduling techniques for asymmetric multi-core systems

As performance and energy efficiency have become the main challenges for next-generation high-performance computing, asymmetric multi-core architectures can provide solutions to tackle these issues. Parallel programming models need to be able to suit the needs of such systems and keep on increasing the application’s portability and efficiency. This paper proposes two task scheduling approaches that target asymmetric systems. These dynamic scheduling policies reduce total execution time either by detecting the longest or the critical path of the dynamic task dependency graph of the application, or by finding the earliest executor of a task. They use dynamic scheduling and information discoverable during execution, fact that makes them implementable and functional without the need of off-line profiling. In our evaluation we compare these scheduling approaches with two existing state-of the art heterogeneous schedulers and we track their improvement over a FIFO baseline scheduler. We show that the heterogeneous schedulers improve the baseline by up to 1.45 in a real 8-core asymmetric system and up to 2.1 in a simulated 32-core asymmetric chip.This work has been supported by the Spanish Government (SEV2015-0493), by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (contract TIN2015-65316-P), by Generalitat de Catalunya (contracts 2014-SGR-1051 and 2014-SGR-1272), by the RoMoL ERC Advanced Grant (GA 321253) and the European HiPEAC Network of Excellence. The Mont-Blanc project receives funding from the EU’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 610402 and from the EU’s H2020 Framework Programme (H2020/2014-2020) under grant agreement no 671697. M. Moretó has been partially supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under Juan de la Cierva postdoctoral fellowship number JCI-2012-15047. M. Casas is supported by the Secretary for Universities and Research of the Ministry of Economy and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia and the Cofund programme of the Marie Curie Actions of the 7th R&D Framework Programme of the European Union (Contract 2013 BP B 00243).Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Energy-Aware Scheduling of Conditional Task Graphs on NoC-Based MPSoCs

We investigate the problem of scheduling a set of tasks with individual deadlines and conditional precedence constraints on a heterogeneous Network on Chip (NoC)-based Multi-Processor System-on-Chip (MPSoC) such that the total expected energy consumption of all the tasks is minimized, and propose a novel approach. Our approach consists of a scheduling heuristic for constructing a single unified schedule for all the tasks and assigning a frequency to each task and each communication assuming continuous frequencies, an Integer Linear Programming (ILP)-based algorithm and a polynomial time heuristic for assigning discrete frequencies and voltages to tasks and communications. We have performed experiments on 16 synthetic and 4 real-world benchmarks. The experimental results show that compared to the state-of-the-art approach, our approach using the ILP-based algorithm and our approach using the polynomial-time heuristic achieve average improvements of 31% and 20%, respectively, in terms of energy reduction

Analytical Performance Comparison of BNP Scheduling Algorithms

Parallel computing is related to the application of many computers running in parallel to solve computationally intensive problems. One of the biggest issues in parallel computing is efficient task scheduling. In this paper, we survey the algorithms that allocate a parallel program represented by an edge-directed acyclic graph (DAG) to a set of homogenous processors with the objective of minimizing the completion time. We examine several such classes of algorithms and then compare the performance of a class of scheduling algorithms known as the bounded number of processors (BNP) scheduling algorithms. Comparison is based on various scheduling parameters such as makespan, speed up, processor utilization and scheduled length ratio. The main focus is given on measuring the impact of increasing the number of tasks and processors on the performance of these four BNP scheduling algorithms

Definition of a Method for the Formulation of Problems to be Solved with High Performance Computing

Computational power made available by current technology has been continuously increasing, however today’s problems are larger and more complex and demand even more computational power. Interest in computational problems has also been increasing and is an important research area in computer science. These complex problems are solved with computational models that use an underlying mathematical model and are solved using computer resources, simulation, and are run with High Performance Computing. For such computations, parallel computing has been employed to achieve high performance. This thesis identifies families of problems that can best be solved using modelling and implementation techniques of parallel computing such as message passing and shared memory. Few case studies are considered to show when the shared memory model is suitable and when the message passing model would be suitable. The models of parallel computing are implemented and evaluated using some algorithms and simulations. This thesis mainly focuses on showing the more suitable model of computing for the various scenarios in attaining High Performance Computing

Performance Comparison Of Bnp Scheduling Algorithms In Homogeneous Environment

Static Scheduling is the mapping of a program to the resources of a parallel system in order to minimize the execution time. This paper presents static scheduling algorithms that schedule an edge-weighted directed acyclic graph (DAG) to a set of homogeneous processors. The aim is to evaluate and compare the performance of different algorithms and select the best algorithm amongst them. Various BNP algorithms are analyzed and classified into four groups - Highest Level First Estimated Time (HLFET), Dynamic Level Scheduling (DLS), Modified Critical Path (MCP) and Earliest Time First (ETF). Based upon their performance considering various factors, best algorithm is determined