Online makespan scheduling with job migration on uniform machines

In the classic minimum makespan scheduling problem, we are given an input sequence of n jobs with sizes. A scheduling algorithm has to assign the jobs to m parallel machines. The objective is to minimize the makespan, which is the time it takes until all jobs are processed. In this paper, we consider online scheduling algorithms without preemption. However, we allow the online algorithm to reassign up to k jobs to different machines in the final assignment. For m identical machines, Albers and Hellwig (Algorithmica, 2017) give tight bounds on the competitive ratio in this model. The precise ratio depends on, and increases with, m. It lies between 4/3 and ~~ 1.4659. They show that k = O(m) is sufficient to achieve this bound and no k = o(n) can result in a better bound. We study m uniform machines, i.e., machines with different speeds, and show that this setting is strictly harder. For sufficiently large m, there is a delta = Theta(1) such that, for m machines with only two different machine speeds, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of less than 1.4659 + delta with k = o(n). We present a new algorithm for the uniform machine setting. Depending on the speeds of the machines, our scheduling algorithm achieves a competitive ratio that lies between 4/3 and ~~ 1.7992 with k = O(m). We also show that k = Omega(m) is necessary to achieve a competitive ratio below 2. Our algorithm is based on a subtle imbalance with respect to the completion times of the machines, complemented by a bicriteria approximation algorithm that minimizes the makespan and maximizes the average completion time for certain sets of machines

Restricted Adaptivity in Stochastic Scheduling

We consider the stochastic scheduling problem of minimizing the expected makespan on m parallel identical machines. While the (adaptive) list scheduling policy achieves an approximation ratio of 2, any (non-adaptive) fixed assignment policy has performance guarantee ?((log m)/(log log m)). Although the performance of the latter class of policies are worse, there are applications in which non-adaptive policies are desired. In this work, we introduce the two classes of ?-delay and ?-shift policies whose degree of adaptivity can be controlled by a parameter. We present a policy - belonging to both classes - which is an ?(log log m)-approximation for reasonably bounded parameters. In other words, an exponential improvement on the performance of any fixed assignment policy can be achieved when allowing a small degree of adaptivity. Moreover, we provide a matching lower bound for any ?-delay and ?-shift policy when both parameters, respectively, are in the order of the expected makespan of an optimal non-anticipatory policy

Efficient Algorithms for Scheduling Moldable Tasks

We study the problem of scheduling $n$ independent moldable tasks on $m$ processors that arises in large-scale parallel computations. When tasks are monotonic, the best known result is a $(\frac{3}{2}+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for makespan minimization with a complexity linear in $n$ and polynomial in $\log{m}$ and $\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ where $\epsilon$ is arbitrarily small. We propose a new perspective of the existing speedup models: the speedup of a task $T_{j}$ is linear when the number $p$ of assigned processors is small (up to a threshold $\delta_{j}$) while it presents monotonicity when $p$ ranges in $[\delta_{j}, k_{j}]$; the bound $k_{j}$ indicates an unacceptable overhead when parallelizing on too many processors. For a given integer $\delta\geq 5$, let $u=\left\lceil \sqrt[2]{\delta} \right\rceil-1$. In this paper, we propose a $\frac{1}{\theta(\delta)} (1+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for makespan minimization with a complexity $\mathcal{O}(n\log{\frac{n}{\epsilon}}\log{m})$ where $\theta(\delta) = \frac{u+1}{u+2}\left( 1- \frac{k}{m} \right)$ ($m\gg k$). As a by-product, we also propose a $\theta(\delta)$-approximation algorithm for throughput maximization with a common deadline with a complexity $\mathcal{O}(n^{2}\log{m})$