39,314 research outputs found
Safe Mutations for Deep and Recurrent Neural Networks through Output Gradients
While neuroevolution (evolving neural networks) has a successful track record
across a variety of domains from reinforcement learning to artificial life, it
is rarely applied to large, deep neural networks. A central reason is that
while random mutation generally works in low dimensions, a random perturbation
of thousands or millions of weights is likely to break existing functionality,
providing no learning signal even if some individual weight changes were
beneficial. This paper proposes a solution by introducing a family of safe
mutation (SM) operators that aim within the mutation operator itself to find a
degree of change that does not alter network behavior too much, but still
facilitates exploration. Importantly, these SM operators do not require any
additional interactions with the environment. The most effective SM variant
capitalizes on the intriguing opportunity to scale the degree of mutation of
each individual weight according to the sensitivity of the network's outputs to
that weight, which requires computing the gradient of outputs with respect to
the weights (instead of the gradient of error, as in conventional deep
learning). This safe mutation through gradients (SM-G) operator dramatically
increases the ability of a simple genetic algorithm-based neuroevolution method
to find solutions in high-dimensional domains that require deep and/or
recurrent neural networks (which tend to be particularly brittle to mutation),
including domains that require processing raw pixels. By improving our ability
to evolve deep neural networks, this new safer approach to mutation expands the
scope of domains amenable to neuroevolution
Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for Deep Neural Networks
Understanding the flow of information in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) is a
challenging problem that has gain increasing attention over the last few years.
While several methods have been proposed to explain network predictions, there
have been only a few attempts to compare them from a theoretical perspective.
What is more, no exhaustive empirical comparison has been performed in the
past. In this work, we analyze four gradient-based attribution methods and
formally prove conditions of equivalence and approximation between them. By
reformulating two of these methods, we construct a unified framework which
enables a direct comparison, as well as an easier implementation. Finally, we
propose a novel evaluation metric, called Sensitivity-n and test the
gradient-based attribution methods alongside with a simple perturbation-based
attribution method on several datasets in the domains of image and text
classification, using various network architectures.Comment: ICLR 201
Spiking Neural Networks for Inference and Learning: A Memristor-based Design Perspective
On metrics of density and power efficiency, neuromorphic technologies have
the potential to surpass mainstream computing technologies in tasks where
real-time functionality, adaptability, and autonomy are essential. While
algorithmic advances in neuromorphic computing are proceeding successfully, the
potential of memristors to improve neuromorphic computing have not yet born
fruit, primarily because they are often used as a drop-in replacement to
conventional memory. However, interdisciplinary approaches anchored in machine
learning theory suggest that multifactor plasticity rules matching neural and
synaptic dynamics to the device capabilities can take better advantage of
memristor dynamics and its stochasticity. Furthermore, such plasticity rules
generally show much higher performance than that of classical Spike Time
Dependent Plasticity (STDP) rules. This chapter reviews the recent development
in learning with spiking neural network models and their possible
implementation with memristor-based hardware
- …