1,515 research outputs found

    Upper bounds for alpha-domination parameters

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we provide a new upper bound for the alpha-domination number. This result generalises the well-known Caro-Roditty bound for the domination number of a graph. The same probabilistic construction is used to generalise another well-known upper bound for the classical domination in graphs. We also prove similar upper bounds for the alpha-rate domination number, which combines the concepts of alpha-domination and k-tuple domination.Comment: 7 pages; Presented at the 4th East Coast Combinatorial Conference, Antigonish (Nova Scotia, Canada), May 1-2, 200

    Upper bounds on the k-forcing number of a graph

    Full text link
    Given a simple undirected graph GG and a positive integer kk, the kk-forcing number of GG, denoted Fk(G)F_k(G), is the minimum number of vertices that need to be initially colored so that all vertices eventually become colored during the discrete dynamical process described by the following rule. Starting from an initial set of colored vertices and stopping when all vertices are colored: if a colored vertex has at most kk non-colored neighbors, then each of its non-colored neighbors becomes colored. When k=1k=1, this is equivalent to the zero forcing number, usually denoted with Z(G)Z(G), a recently introduced invariant that gives an upper bound on the maximum nullity of a graph. In this paper, we give several upper bounds on the kk-forcing number. Notable among these, we show that if GG is a graph with order nβ‰₯2n \ge 2 and maximum degree Ξ”β‰₯k\Delta \ge k, then Fk(G)≀(Ξ”βˆ’k+1)nΞ”βˆ’k+1+min⁑{Ξ΄,k}F_k(G) \le \frac{(\Delta-k+1)n}{\Delta - k + 1 +\min{\{\delta,k\}}}. This simplifies to, for the zero forcing number case of k=1k=1, Z(G)=F1(G)≀ΔnΞ”+1Z(G)=F_1(G) \le \frac{\Delta n}{\Delta+1}. Moreover, when Ξ”β‰₯2\Delta \ge 2 and the graph is kk-connected, we prove that Fk(G)≀(Ξ”βˆ’2)n+2Ξ”+kβˆ’2F_k(G) \leq \frac{(\Delta-2)n+2}{\Delta+k-2}, which is an improvement when k≀2k\leq 2, and specializes to, for the zero forcing number case, Z(G)=F1(G)≀(Ξ”βˆ’2)n+2Ξ”βˆ’1Z(G)= F_1(G) \le \frac{(\Delta -2)n+2}{\Delta -1}. These results resolve a problem posed by Meyer about regular bipartite circulant graphs. Finally, we present a relationship between the kk-forcing number and the connected kk-domination number. As a corollary, we find that the sum of the zero forcing number and connected domination number is at most the order for connected graphs.Comment: 15 pages, 0 figure
    • …
    corecore