Mapping annual forest cover by fusing PALSAR/PALSAR-2 and MODIS NDVI during 2007–2016

Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) Phased Arrayed L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) HH and HV polarization data were used previously to produce annual, global 25 m forest maps between 2007 and 2010, and the latest global forest maps of 2015 and 2016 were produced by using the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 data. However, annual 25 m spatial resolution forest maps during 2011–2014 are missing because of the gap in operation between ALOS and ALOS-2, preventing the construction of a continuous, fine resolution time-series dataset on the world's forests. In contrast, the MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) NDVI images were available globally since 2000. This research developed a novel method to produce annual 25 m forest maps during 2007–2016 by fusing the fine spatial resolution, but asynchronous PALSAR/PALSAR-2 with coarse spatial resolution, but synchronous MODIS NDVI data, thus, filling the four-year gap in the ALOS and ALOS-2 time-series, as well as enhancing the existing mapping activity. The method was developed concentrating on two key objectives: 1) producing more accurate 25 m forest maps by integrating PALSAR/PALSAR-2 and MODIS NDVI data during 2007–2010 and 2015–2016; 2) reconstructing annual 25 m forest maps from time-series MODIS NDVI images during 2011–2014. Specifically, a decision tree classification was developed for forest mapping based on both the PALSAR/PALSAR-2 and MODIS NDVI data, and a new spatial-temporal super-resolution mapping was proposed to reconstruct the 25 m forest maps from time-series MODIS NDVI images. Three study sites including Paraguay, the USA and Russia were chosen, as they represent the world's three main forest types: tropical forest, temperate broadleaf and mixed forest, and boreal conifer forest, respectively. Compared with traditional methods, the proposed approach produced the most accurate continuous time-series of fine spatial resolution forest maps both visually and quantitatively. For the forest maps during 2007–2010 and 2015–2016, the results had greater overall accuracy values (>98%) than those of the original JAXA forest product. For the reconstructed 25 m forest maps during 2011–2014, the increases in classifications accuracy relative to three benchmark methods were statistically significant, and the overall accuracy values of the three study sites were almost universally >92%. The proposed approach, therefore, has great potential to support the production of annual 25 m forest maps by fusing PALSAR/PALSAR-2 and MODIS NDVI during 2007–2016

Semi-supervised feature extraction using independent factor analysis

International audienceDimensionality reduction can be efficiently achieved by generative latent variable models such as probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA) or independent component analysis (ICA), aiming to extract a reduced set of variables (latent variables) from the original ones. In most cases, the learning of these methods is achieved within the unsupervised framework where only unlabeled samples are used. In this paper we investigate the possibility of estimating independent factor analysis model (IFA) and thus projecting original data onto a lower dimensional space, when prior knowledge on the cluster membership of some training samples is incorporated. In the basic IFA model, latent variables are only recovered from their linear observed mixtures (original features). Both the mapping matrix (assumed to be linear) and the latent variable densities (that are assumed to be mutually independent and generated according to mixtures of Gaussians) are learned from observed data. We propose to learn this model within semisupervised framework where the likelihood of both labeled and unlabeled samples is maximized by a generalized expectation-maximization (GEM) algorithm. Experimental results on real data sets are provided to demonstrate the ability of our approach to find law dimensional manifold with good explanatory power

Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches

Imaging spectrometers measure electromagnetic energy scattered in their instantaneous field view in hundreds or thousands of spectral channels with higher spectral resolution than multispectral cameras. Imaging spectrometers are therefore often referred to as hyperspectral cameras (HSCs). Higher spectral resolution enables material identification via spectroscopic analysis, which facilitates countless applications that require identifying materials in scenarios unsuitable for classical spectroscopic analysis. Due to low spatial resolution of HSCs, microscopic material mixing, and multiple scattering, spectra measured by HSCs are mixtures of spectra of materials in a scene. Thus, accurate estimation requires unmixing. Pixels are assumed to be mixtures of a few materials, called endmembers. Unmixing involves estimating all or some of: the number of endmembers, their spectral signatures, and their abundances at each pixel. Unmixing is a challenging, ill-posed inverse problem because of model inaccuracies, observation noise, environmental conditions, endmember variability, and data set size. Researchers have devised and investigated many models searching for robust, stable, tractable, and accurate unmixing algorithms. This paper presents an overview of unmixing methods from the time of Keshava and Mustard's unmixing tutorial [1] to the present. Mixing models are first discussed. Signal-subspace, geometrical, statistical, sparsity-based, and spatial-contextual unmixing algorithms are described. Mathematical problems and potential solutions are described. Algorithm characteristics are illustrated experimentally.Comment: This work has been accepted for publication in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensin

Assessment of accuracy: systematic reduction of training points for maximum likelihood classification and mixture discriminant analysis (Gaussian and t-distribution)

Remote sensing provides a valuable tool for monitoring land cover across large areas of land. A simple yet popular method for land cover classification is Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC), which assumes a single normal distribution of the samples per class in the feature space. Mixture Discriminant Analysis (MDA) is a natural extension of MLC which can be used with varying distributions and multiple distributions per class, which simplifies the classification process tremendously. We compare the accuracies of MLC and MDA (using a Gaussian and t-distribution) as the number of training points are systematically reduced in order to simulate varying reference data availability conditions. The results show that the more robust t-distribution MDA performs comparatively with the Gaussian MDA and that both outperform MLC when sufficient training points are available. As the number of training points increases the MDA accuracies increase while the MLC accuracy stagnates. At very low numbers of training samples (ranging from 22 to 169 dependent on the class), there is more variability in terms of which method performs best