185 research outputs found

    Chromatic number of graphs and edge Folkman numbers

    Full text link
    In the paper we give a lower bound for the number of vertices of a given graph using its chromatic number. We find the graphs for which this bound is exact. The results are applied in the theory of Foklman numbers.Comment: 9 pages, 1 figur

    Combinatorial theorems relative to a random set

    Get PDF
    We describe recent advances in the study of random analogues of combinatorial theorems.Comment: 26 pages. Submitted to Proceedings of the ICM 201

    A Folkman Linear Family

    Full text link
    For graphs FF and GG, let Fβ†’(G,G)F\to (G,G) signify that any red/blue edge coloring of FF contains a monochromatic GG. Define Folkman number f(G;p)f(G;p) to be the smallest order of a graph FF such that Fβ†’(G,G)F\to (G,G) and Ο‰(F)≀p\omega(F) \le p. It is shown that f(G;p)≀cnf(G;p)\le cn for graphs GG of order nn with Ξ”(G)≀Δ\Delta(G)\le \Delta, where Ξ”β‰₯3\Delta\ge 3, c=c(Ξ”)c=c(\Delta) and p=p(Ξ”)p=p(\Delta) are positive constants.Comment: 11 page

    On Some Generalized Vertex Folkman Numbers

    Full text link
    For a graph GG and integers aiβ‰₯2a_i\ge 2, the expression Gβ†’(a1,…,ar)vG \rightarrow (a_1,\dots,a_r)^v means that for any rr-coloring of the vertices of GG there exists a monochromatic aia_i-clique in GG for some color i∈{1,⋯ ,r}i \in \{1,\cdots,r\}. The vertex Folkman numbers are defined as Fv(a1,…,ar;H)=min⁑{∣V(G)∣:GF_v(a_1,\dots,a_r;H) = \min\{|V(G)| : G is HH-free and Gβ†’(a1,…,ar)v}G \rightarrow (a_1,\dots,a_r)^v\}, where HH is a graph. Such vertex Folkman numbers have been extensively studied for H=KsH=K_s with s>max⁑{ai}1≀i≀rs>\max\{a_i\}_{1\le i \le r}. If ai=aa_i=a for all ii, then we use notation Fv(ar;H)=Fv(a1,…,ar;H)F_v(a^r;H)=F_v(a_1,\dots,a_r;H). Let JkJ_k be the complete graph KkK_k missing one edge, i.e. Jk=Kkβˆ’eJ_k=K_k-e. In this work we focus on vertex Folkman numbers with H=JkH=J_k, in particular for k=4k=4 and ai≀3a_i\le 3. A result by Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il and R\"{o}dl from 1976 implies that Fv(3r;J4)F_v(3^r;J_4) is well defined for any rβ‰₯2r\ge 2. We present a new and more direct proof of this fact. The simplest but already intriguing case is that of Fv(3,3;J4)F_v(3,3;J_4), for which we establish the upper bound of 135. We obtain the exact values and bounds for a few other small cases of Fv(a1,…,ar;J4)F_v(a_1,\dots,a_r;J_4) when ai≀3a_i \le 3 for all 1≀i≀r1 \le i \le r, including Fv(2,3;J4)=14F_v(2,3;J_4)=14, Fv(24;J4)=15F_v(2^4;J_4)=15, and 22≀Fv(25;J4)≀2522 \le F_v(2^5;J_4) \le 25. Note that Fv(2r;J4)F_v(2^r;J_4) is the smallest number of vertices in any J4J_4-free graph with chromatic number r+1r+1. Most of the results were obtained with the help of computations, but some of the upper bound graphs we found are interesting by themselves
    • …
    corecore