157,563 research outputs found
Consensus clustering in complex networks
The community structure of complex networks reveals both their organization
and hidden relationships among their constituents. Most community detection
methods currently available are not deterministic, and their results typically
depend on the specific random seeds, initial conditions and tie-break rules
adopted for their execution. Consensus clustering is used in data analysis to
generate stable results out of a set of partitions delivered by stochastic
methods. Here we show that consensus clustering can be combined with any
existing method in a self-consistent way, enhancing considerably both the
stability and the accuracy of the resulting partitions. This framework is also
particularly suitable to monitor the evolution of community structure in
temporal networks. An application of consensus clustering to a large citation
network of physics papers demonstrates its capability to keep track of the
birth, death and diversification of topics.Comment: 11 pages, 12 figures. Published in Scientific Report
Distributed Temporal Link Prediction Algorithm Based on Label Propagation
Link prediction has steadily become an important research topic in the area of complex networks. However, the current link prediction algorithms typically neglect the evolution process and they tend to exhibit low accuracy and scalability when applied to large-scale networks. In this article, we propose a novel distributed temporal link prediction algorithm based on label propagation (DTLPLP), governed by the dynamical properties of the interactions between nodes. In particular, nodes are associated with labels, which include details of their sources, and the corresponding similarity value. When such labels are propagated across neighbouring nodes, they are updated based on the weights of the incident links, and the values from same source nodes are aggregated to evaluate the scores of links in the predicted network. Furthermore, DTLPLP has been designed to be distributed and parallelised, and thus suitable for large-scale network analysis. As part of the validation process, we have designed a prototype system developed in Pregel, which is a distributed network analysis framework. Experiments are conducted on the Enron e-mails and the General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology Scientific Collaboration networks. The experimental results show that compared to the most of link prediction algorithms, DTLPLP offers enhanced accuracy, stability and scalability
LAGO: The Latin American giant observatory
The Latin American Giant Observatory (LAGO) is an extended cosmic ray observatory composed of a network of water-Cherenkov detectors (WCD) spanning over different sites located at significantly different altitudes (from sea level up to more than 5000 m a.s.l.) and latitudes across Latin America, covering a wide range of geomagnetic rigidity cut-offs and atmospheric absorption/reaction levels. The LAGO WCD is simple and robust, and incorporates several integrated devices to allow time synchronization, autonomous operation, on board data analysis, as well as remote control and automated data transfer. This detection network is designed to make detailed measurements of the temporal evolution of the radiation flux coming from outer space at ground level. LAGO is mainly oriented to perform basic research in three areas: high energy phenomena, space weather and atmospheric radiation at ground level. It is an observatory designed, built and operated by the LAGO Collaboration, a non-centralized collaborative union of more than 30 institutions from ten countries. In this paper we describe the scientific and academic goals of the LAGO project - illustrating its present status with some recent results - and outline its future perspectives.Fil: Sidelnik, Iván Pedro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina. Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica. Gerencia del Área de Energía Nuclear. Gerencia de Ingeniería Nuclear (CAB). División Neutrones y Reactores; Argentina. Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica. Gerencia del Área de Energía Nuclear. Instituto Balseiro; ArgentinaFil: Asorey, Hernán Gonzalo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Tecnología en Detección y Astropartículas. Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica. Instituto de Tecnología en Detección y Astropartículas. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Tecnología en Detección y Astropartículas; Argentina. Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica. Gerencia del Área de Energía Nuclear. Instituto Balseiro; ArgentinaFil: Lago Collaboration. Latin American Giant Observatory; Argentin
Collaboration in sensor network research: an in-depth longitudinal analysis of assortative mixing patterns
Many investigations of scientific collaboration are based on statistical
analyses of large networks constructed from bibliographic repositories. These
investigations often rely on a wealth of bibliographic data, but very little or
no other information about the individuals in the network, and thus, fail to
illustrate the broader social and academic landscape in which collaboration
takes place. In this article, we perform an in-depth longitudinal analysis of a
relatively small network of scientific collaboration (N = 291) constructed from
the bibliographic record of a research center involved in the development and
application of sensor network and wireless technologies. We perform a
preliminary analysis of selected structural properties of the network,
computing its range, configuration and topology. We then support our
preliminary statistical analysis with an in-depth temporal investigation of the
assortative mixing of selected node characteristics, unveiling the researchers'
propensity to collaborate preferentially with others with a similar academic
profile. Our qualitative analysis of mixing patterns offers clues as to the
nature of the scientific community being modeled in relation to its
organizational, disciplinary, institutional, and international arrangements of
collaboration.Comment: Scientometrics (In press
Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review
Bibliometrics has become an essential tool for assessing and analyzing the output of scientists, cooperation between
universities, the effect of state-owned science funding on national research and development performance and educational
efficiency, among other applications. Therefore, professionals and scientists need a range of theoretical and practical
tools to measure experimental data. This review aims to provide an up-to-date review of the various tools available
for conducting bibliometric and scientometric analyses, including the sources of data acquisition, performance analysis
and visualization tools. The included tools were divided into three categories: general bibliometric and performance
analysis, science mapping analysis, and libraries; a description of all of them is provided. A comparative analysis of the
database sources support, pre-processing capabilities, analysis and visualization options were also provided in order to
facilitate its understanding. Although there are numerous bibliometric databases to obtain data for bibliometric and
scientometric analysis, they have been developed for a different purpose. The number of exportable records is between
500 and 50,000 and the coverage of the different science fields is unequal in each database. Concerning the analyzed
tools, Bibliometrix contains the more extensive set of techniques and suitable for practitioners through Biblioshiny.
VOSviewer has a fantastic visualization and is capable of loading and exporting information from many sources. SciMAT
is the tool with a powerful pre-processing and export capability. In views of the variability of features, the users need to
decide the desired analysis output and chose the option that better fits into their aims
Intrinsically Dynamic Network Communities
Community finding algorithms for networks have recently been extended to
dynamic data. Most of these recent methods aim at exhibiting community
partitions from successive graph snapshots and thereafter connecting or
smoothing these partitions using clever time-dependent features and sampling
techniques. These approaches are nonetheless achieving longitudinal rather than
dynamic community detection. We assume that communities are fundamentally
defined by the repetition of interactions among a set of nodes over time.
According to this definition, analyzing the data by considering successive
snapshots induces a significant loss of information: we suggest that it blurs
essentially dynamic phenomena - such as communities based on repeated
inter-temporal interactions, nodes switching from a community to another across
time, or the possibility that a community survives while its members are being
integrally replaced over a longer time period. We propose a formalism which
aims at tackling this issue in the context of time-directed datasets (such as
citation networks), and present several illustrations on both empirical and
synthetic dynamic networks. We eventually introduce intrinsically dynamic
metrics to qualify temporal community structure and emphasize their possible
role as an estimator of the quality of the community detection - taking into
account the fact that various empirical contexts may call for distinct
`community' definitions and detection criteria.Comment: 27 pages, 11 figure
Centrality Metric for Dynamic Networks
Centrality is an important notion in network analysis and is used to measure
the degree to which network structure contributes to the importance of a node
in a network. While many different centrality measures exist, most of them
apply to static networks. Most networks, on the other hand, are dynamic in
nature, evolving over time through the addition or deletion of nodes and edges.
A popular approach to analyzing such networks represents them by a static
network that aggregates all edges observed over some time period. This
approach, however, under or overestimates centrality of some nodes. We address
this problem by introducing a novel centrality metric for dynamic network
analysis. This metric exploits an intuition that in order for one node in a
dynamic network to influence another over some period of time, there must exist
a path that connects the source and destination nodes through intermediaries at
different times. We demonstrate on an example network that the proposed metric
leads to a very different ranking than analysis of an equivalent static
network. We use dynamic centrality to study a dynamic citations network and
contrast results to those reached by static network analysis.Comment: in KDD workshop on Mining and Learning in Graphs (MLG
- …