482 research outputs found
Constraint Expressions and Workflow Satisfiability
A workflow specification defines a set of steps and the order in which those
steps must be executed. Security requirements and business rules may impose
constraints on which users are permitted to perform those steps. A workflow
specification is said to be satisfiable if there exists an assignment of
authorized users to workflow steps that satisfies all the constraints. An
algorithm for determining whether such an assignment exists is important, both
as a static analysis tool for workflow specifications, and for the construction
of run-time reference monitors for workflow management systems. We develop new
methods for determining workflow satisfiability based on the concept of
constraint expressions, which were introduced recently by Khan and Fong. These
methods are surprising versatile, enabling us to develop algorithms for, and
determine the complexity of, a number of different problems related to workflow
satisfiability.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1205.0852; to appear in
Proceedings of SACMAT 201
A Declarative Framework for Specifying and Enforcing Purpose-aware Policies
Purpose is crucial for privacy protection as it makes users confident that
their personal data are processed as intended. Available proposals for the
specification and enforcement of purpose-aware policies are unsatisfactory for
their ambiguous semantics of purposes and/or lack of support to the run-time
enforcement of policies.
In this paper, we propose a declarative framework based on a first-order
temporal logic that allows us to give a precise semantics to purpose-aware
policies and to reuse algorithms for the design of a run-time monitor enforcing
purpose-aware policies. We also show the complexity of the generation and use
of the monitor which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first such a result
in literature on purpose-aware policies.Comment: Extended version of the paper accepted at the 11th International
Workshop on Security and Trust Management (STM 2015
Algorithms for the workflow satisfiability problem engineered for counting constraints
The workflow satisfiability problem (WSP) asks whether there exists an
assignment of authorized users to the steps in a workflow specification that
satisfies the constraints in the specification. The problem is NP-hard in
general, but several subclasses of the problem are known to be fixed-parameter
tractable (FPT) when parameterized by the number of steps in the specification.
In this paper, we consider the WSP with user-independent counting constraints,
a large class of constraints for which the WSP is known to be FPT. We describe
an efficient implementation of an FPT algorithm for solving this subclass of
the WSP and an experimental evaluation of this algorithm. The algorithm
iteratively generates all equivalence classes of possible partial solutions
until, whenever possible, it finds a complete solution to the problem. We also
provide a reduction from a WSP instance to a pseudo-Boolean SAT instance. We
apply this reduction to the instances used in our experiments and solve the
resulting PB SAT problems using SAT4J, a PB SAT solver. We compare the
performance of our algorithm with that of SAT4J and discuss which of the two
approaches would be more effective in practice
Verifying the Interplay of Authorization Policies and Workflow in Service-Oriented Architectures (Full version)
A widespread design approach in distributed applications based on the
service-oriented paradigm, such as web-services, consists of clearly separating
the enforcement of authorization policies and the workflow of the applications,
so that the interplay between the policy level and the workflow level is
abstracted away. While such an approach is attractive because it is quite
simple and permits one to reason about crucial properties of the policies under
consideration, it does not provide the right level of abstraction to specify
and reason about the way the workflow may interfere with the policies, and vice
versa. For example, the creation of a certificate as a side effect of a
workflow operation may enable a policy rule to fire and grant access to a
certain resource; without executing the operation, the policy rule should
remain inactive. Similarly, policy queries may be used as guards for workflow
transitions.
In this paper, we present a two-level formal verification framework to
overcome these problems and formally reason about the interplay of
authorization policies and workflow in service-oriented architectures. This
allows us to define and investigate some verification problems for SO
applications and give sufficient conditions for their decidability.Comment: 16 pages, 4 figures, full version of paper at Symposium on Secure
Computing (SecureCom09
Modularity for Security-Sensitive Workflows
An established trend in software engineering insists on using components
(sometimes also called services or packages) to encapsulate a set of related
functionalities or data. By defining interfaces specifying what functionalities
they provide or use, components can be combined with others to form more
complex components. In this way, IT systems can be designed by mostly re-using
existing components and developing new ones to provide new functionalities. In
this paper, we introduce a notion of component and a combination mechanism for
an important class of software artifacts, called security-sensitive workflows.
These are business processes in which execution constraints on the tasks are
complemented with authorization constraints (e.g., Separation of Duty) and
authorization policies (constraining which users can execute which tasks). We
show how well-known workflow execution patterns can be simulated by our
combination mechanism and how authorization constraints can also be imposed
across components. Then, we demonstrate the usefulness of our notion of
component by showing (i) the scalability of a technique for the synthesis of
run-time monitors for security-sensitive workflows and (ii) the design of a
plug-in for the re-use of workflows and related run-time monitors inside an
editor for security-sensitive workflows
Process Driven Access Control and Authorisation Approach
Compliance to regulatory requirements is key to successful collaborative business process execution. The review the EU general data protection regulation (GDPR) brought to the fore the need to comply with data privacy. Access control and authorization mechanisms in workflow management systems based on roles, tasks and attributes do not sufficiently address the current complex and dynamic privacy requirements in collaborative business process environments due to diverse policies. This paper proposes process driven authorization as an alternative approach to data access control and authorization where access is granted based on legitimate need to accomplish a task in the business process. Due to vast sources of regulations, a mechanism to derive and validate a composite set of constraints free of conflicts and contradictions is presented. An extended workflow tree language is also presented to support constraint modeling. An industry case Pick and Pack process is used for illustration
- …