Bounds on the Game Transversal Number in Hypergraphs

Let $H = (V,E)$ be a hypergraph with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$ of order \nH = |V| and size \mH = |E|. A transversal in $H$ is a subset of vertices in $H$ that has a nonempty intersection with every edge of $H$. A vertex hits an edge if it belongs to that edge. The transversal game played on $H$ involves of two players, \emph{Edge-hitter} and \emph{Staller}, who take turns choosing a vertex from $H$. Each vertex chosen must hit at least one edge not hit by the vertices previously chosen. The game ends when the set of vertices chosen becomes a transversal in $H$. Edge-hitter wishes to minimize the number of vertices chosen in the game, while Staller wishes to maximize it. The \emph{game transversal number}, $\tau_g(H)$, of $H$ is the number of vertices chosen when Edge-hitter starts the game and both players play optimally. We compare the game transversal number of a hypergraph with its transversal number, and also present an important fact concerning the monotonicity of $\tau_g$, that we call the Transversal Continuation Principle. It is known that if $H$ is a hypergraph with all edges of size at least~$2$, and $H$ is not a $4$-cycle, then \tau_g(H) \le \frac{4}{11}(\nH+\mH); and if $H$ is a (loopless) graph, then \tau_g(H) \le \frac{1}{3}(\nH + \mH + 1). We prove that if $H$ is a $3$-uniform hypergraph, then \tau_g(H) \le \frac{5}{16}(\nH + \mH), and if $H$ is $4$-uniform, then \tau_g(H) \le \frac{71}{252}(\nH + \mH).Comment: 23 pages

Dominating sets in Kneser graphs

This thesis investigates dominating sets in Kneser graphs as well as a selection of other topics related to graph domination. Dominating sets in Kneser graphs, especially those of minimum size, often correspond to interesting combinatorial incidence structures. We begin with background on the dominating set problem and a review of known bounds, focusing on algebraic bounds. We then consider this problem in the Kneser graphs, discussing basic results and previous work. We compute the domination number for a few of the Kneser graphs with the aid of some original results. We also investigate the connections between Kneser graph domination and the theory of combinatorial designs, and introduce a new type of design that generalizes the properties of dominating sets in Kneser graphs. We then consider dominating sets in the vector space analogue of Kneser graphs. We end by highlighting connections between the dominating set problem and other areas of combinatorics. Conjectures and open problems abound

Inapproximability of H-Transversal/Packing

Given an undirected graph G=(V,E) and a fixed pattern graph H with k vertices, we consider the H-Transversal and H-Packing problems. The former asks to find the smallest subset S of vertices such that the subgraph induced by V - S does not have H as a subgraph, and the latter asks to find the maximum number of pairwise disjoint k-subsets S1, ..., Sm such that the subgraph induced by each Si has H as a subgraph. We prove that if H is 2-connected, H-Transversal and H-Packing are almost as hard to approximate as general k-Hypergraph Vertex Cover and k-Set Packing, so it is NP-hard to approximate them within a factor of Omega(k) and Omega(k / polylog(k)) respectively. We also show that there is a 1-connected H where H-Transversal admits an O(log k)-approximation algorithm, so that the connectivity requirement cannot be relaxed from 2 to 1. For a special case of H-Transversal where H is a (family of) cycles, we mention the implication of our result to the related Feedback Vertex Set problem, and give a different hardness proof for directed graphs