20,439 research outputs found

    Metric dimension of dual polar graphs

    Full text link
    A resolving set for a graph Γ\Gamma is a collection of vertices SS, chosen so that for each vertex vv, the list of distances from vv to the members of SS uniquely specifies vv. The metric dimension μ(Γ)\mu(\Gamma) is the smallest size of a resolving set for Γ\Gamma. We consider the metric dimension of the dual polar graphs, and show that it is at most the rank over R\mathbb{R} of the incidence matrix of the corresponding polar space. We then compute this rank to give an explicit upper bound on the metric dimension of dual polar graphs.Comment: 8 page

    On the metric dimension of affine planes, biaffine planes and generalized quadrangles

    Get PDF
    In this paper the metric dimension of (the incidence graphs of) particular partial linear spaces is considered. We prove that the metric dimension of an affine plane of order q13q\geq13 is 3q43q-4 and describe all resolving sets of that size if q23q\geq 23. The metric dimension of a biaffine plane (also called a flag-type elliptic semiplane) of order q4q\geq 4 is shown to fall between 2q22q-2 and 3q63q-6, while for Desarguesian biaffine planes the lower bound is improved to 8q/378q/3-7 under q7q\geq 7, and to 3q9q3q-9\sqrt{q} under certain stronger restrictions on qq. We determine the metric dimension of generalized quadrangles of order (s,1)(s,1), ss arbitrary. We derive that the metric dimension of generalized quadrangles of order (q,q)(q,q), q2q\geq2, is at least max{6q27,4q7}\max\{6q-27,4q-7\}, while for the classical generalized quadrangles W(q)W(q) and Q(4,q)Q(4,q) it is at most 8q8q

    Resolving sets for Johnson and Kneser graphs

    Get PDF
    A set of vertices SS in a graph GG is a {\em resolving set} for GG if, for any two vertices u,vu,v, there exists xSx\in S such that the distances d(u,x)d(v,x)d(u,x) \neq d(v,x). In this paper, we consider the Johnson graphs J(n,k)J(n,k) and Kneser graphs K(n,k)K(n,k), and obtain various constructions of resolving sets for these graphs. As well as general constructions, we show that various interesting combinatorial objects can be used to obtain resolving sets in these graphs, including (for Johnson graphs) projective planes and symmetric designs, as well as (for Kneser graphs) partial geometries, Hadamard matrices, Steiner systems and toroidal grids.Comment: 23 pages, 2 figures, 1 tabl

    On the metric dimension of Grassmann graphs

    Full text link
    The {\em metric dimension} of a graph Γ\Gamma is the least number of vertices in a set with the property that the list of distances from any vertex to those in the set uniquely identifies that vertex. We consider the Grassmann graph Gq(n,k)G_q(n,k) (whose vertices are the kk-subspaces of Fqn\mathbb{F}_q^n, and are adjacent if they intersect in a (k1)(k-1)-subspace) for k2k\geq 2, and find a constructive upper bound on its metric dimension. Our bound is equal to the number of 1-dimensional subspaces of Fqn\mathbb{F}_q^n.Comment: 9 pages. Revised to correct an error in Proposition 9 of the previous versio

    Identifying codes in vertex-transitive graphs and strongly regular graphs

    Get PDF
    We consider the problem of computing identifying codes of graphs and its fractional relaxation. The ratio between the size of optimal integer and fractional solutions is between 1 and 2ln(vertical bar V vertical bar) + 1 where V is the set of vertices of the graph. We focus on vertex-transitive graphs for which we can compute the exact fractional solution. There are known examples of vertex-transitive graphs that reach both bounds. We exhibit infinite families of vertex-transitive graphs with integer and fractional identifying codes of order vertical bar V vertical bar(alpha) with alpha is an element of{1/4, 1/3, 2/5}These families are generalized quadrangles (strongly regular graphs based on finite geometries). They also provide examples for metric dimension of graphs
    corecore