1,644 research outputs found

    Injective colorings of graphs with low average degree

    Full text link
    Let \mad(G) denote the maximum average degree (over all subgraphs) of GG and let χi(G)\chi_i(G) denote the injective chromatic number of GG. We prove that if Δ4\Delta\geq 4 and \mad(G)<\frac{14}5, then χi(G)Δ+2\chi_i(G)\leq\Delta+2. When Δ=3\Delta=3, we show that \mad(G)<\frac{36}{13} implies χi(G)5\chi_i(G)\le 5. In contrast, we give a graph GG with Δ=3\Delta=3, \mad(G)=\frac{36}{13}, and χi(G)=6\chi_i(G)=6.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figure

    Lower Bounds for the Graph Homomorphism Problem

    Full text link
    The graph homomorphism problem (HOM) asks whether the vertices of a given nn-vertex graph GG can be mapped to the vertices of a given hh-vertex graph HH such that each edge of GG is mapped to an edge of HH. The problem generalizes the graph coloring problem and at the same time can be viewed as a special case of the 22-CSP problem. In this paper, we prove several lower bound for HOM under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) assumption. The main result is a lower bound 2Ω(nloghloglogh)2^{\Omega\left( \frac{n \log h}{\log \log h}\right)}. This rules out the existence of a single-exponential algorithm and shows that the trivial upper bound 2O(nlogh)2^{{\mathcal O}(n\log{h})} is almost asymptotically tight. We also investigate what properties of graphs GG and HH make it difficult to solve HOM(G,H)(G,H). An easy observation is that an O(hn){\mathcal O}(h^n) upper bound can be improved to O(hvc(G)){\mathcal O}(h^{\operatorname{vc}(G)}) where vc(G)\operatorname{vc}(G) is the minimum size of a vertex cover of GG. The second lower bound hΩ(vc(G))h^{\Omega(\operatorname{vc}(G))} shows that the upper bound is asymptotically tight. As to the properties of the "right-hand side" graph HH, it is known that HOM(G,H)(G,H) can be solved in time (f(Δ(H)))n(f(\Delta(H)))^n and (f(tw(H)))n(f(\operatorname{tw}(H)))^n where Δ(H)\Delta(H) is the maximum degree of HH and tw(H)\operatorname{tw}(H) is the treewidth of HH. This gives single-exponential algorithms for graphs of bounded maximum degree or bounded treewidth. Since the chromatic number χ(H)\chi(H) does not exceed tw(H)\operatorname{tw}(H) and Δ(H)+1\Delta(H)+1, it is natural to ask whether similar upper bounds with respect to χ(H)\chi(H) can be obtained. We provide a negative answer to this question by establishing a lower bound (f(χ(H)))n(f(\chi(H)))^n for any function ff. We also observe that similar lower bounds can be obtained for locally injective homomorphisms.Comment: 19 page

    Injective colorings of sparse graphs

    Get PDF
    Let mad(G)mad(G) denote the maximum average degree (over all subgraphs) of GG and let χi(G)\chi_i(G) denote the injective chromatic number of GG. We prove that if mad(G)5/2mad(G) \leq 5/2, then χi(G)Δ(G)+1\chi_i(G)\leq\Delta(G) + 1; and if mad(G)<42/19mad(G) < 42/19, then χi(G)=Δ(G)\chi_i(G)=\Delta(G). Suppose that GG is a planar graph with girth g(G)g(G) and Δ(G)4\Delta(G)\geq 4. We prove that if g(G)9g(G)\geq 9, then χi(G)Δ(G)+1\chi_i(G)\leq\Delta(G)+1; similarly, if g(G)13g(G)\geq 13, then χi(G)=Δ(G)\chi_i(G)=\Delta(G).Comment: 10 page
    corecore