3,125 research outputs found
Enhancing Fixed Point Logic with Cardinality Quantifiers
Let Q IPP be any quantifier such that FO(QIFP), first-order logic enhanced with Q IPP and its vectorizations, equals inductive fixed point logic, IFP in expressive power. It is known that for certain quantifiers Q, the equivalence FO(QIFP) ≡ IFP is no longer true if Q is added on both sides. Rather, we have FO (QIFP, Q) < IFP(Q) in such cases. We extend these results to a great variety of quantifiers, namely all unbounded simple cardinality quantifiers. Our argument also applies to partial fixed point logic, PFP. In order to establish an analogous result for least fixed point logic, LFP, we exhibit a general method to pass from arbitrary quantifiers to monotone quantifiers. Our proof shows that the three isomorphism problem is not definable in, infinitary logic extended with all monadic quantifiers and their vectorizations, where a finite bound is imposed to the number of variables as well as to the number of nested quantifiers in Q1. This strengthens a result of Etessami and Immerman by which tree isomorphism is not definable in TC + COUNTIN
Order-Invariant MSO is Stronger than Counting MSO in the Finite
We compare the expressiveness of two extensions of monadic second-order logic
(MSO) over the class of finite structures. The first, counting monadic
second-order logic (CMSO), extends MSO with first-order modulo-counting
quantifiers, allowing the expression of queries like ``the number of elements
in the structure is even''. The second extension allows the use of an
additional binary predicate, not contained in the signature of the queried
structure, that must be interpreted as an arbitrary linear order on its
universe, obtaining order-invariant MSO.
While it is straightforward that every CMSO formula can be translated into an
equivalent order-invariant MSO formula, the converse had not yet been settled.
Courcelle showed that for restricted classes of structures both order-invariant
MSO and CMSO are equally expressive, but conjectured that, in general,
order-invariant MSO is stronger than CMSO.
We affirm this conjecture by presenting a class of structures that is
order-invariantly definable in MSO but not definable in CMSO.Comment: Revised version contributed to STACS 200
Queries with Guarded Negation (full version)
A well-established and fundamental insight in database theory is that
negation (also known as complementation) tends to make queries difficult to
process and difficult to reason about. Many basic problems are decidable and
admit practical algorithms in the case of unions of conjunctive queries, but
become difficult or even undecidable when queries are allowed to contain
negation. Inspired by recent results in finite model theory, we consider a
restricted form of negation, guarded negation. We introduce a fragment of SQL,
called GN-SQL, as well as a fragment of Datalog with stratified negation,
called GN-Datalog, that allow only guarded negation, and we show that these
query languages are computationally well behaved, in terms of testing query
containment, query evaluation, open-world query answering, and boundedness.
GN-SQL and GN-Datalog subsume a number of well known query languages and
constraint languages, such as unions of conjunctive queries, monadic Datalog,
and frontier-guarded tgds. In addition, an analysis of standard benchmark
workloads shows that most usage of negation in SQL in practice is guarded
negation
An expressive completeness theorem for coalgebraic modal mu-calculi
Generalizing standard monadic second-order logic for Kripke models, we
introduce monadic second-order logic interpreted over coalgebras for an
arbitrary set functor. We then consider invariance under behavioral equivalence
of MSO-formulas. More specifically, we investigate whether the coalgebraic
mu-calculus is the bisimulation-invariant fragment of the monadic second-order
language for a given functor. Using automatatheoretic techniques and building
on recent results by the third author, we show that in order to provide such a
characterization result it suffices to find what we call an adequate uniform
construction for the coalgebraic type functor. As direct applications of this
result we obtain a partly new proof of the Janin-Walukiewicz Theorem for the
modal mu-calculus, avoiding the use of syntactic normal forms, and bisimulation
invariance results for the bag functor (graded modal logic) and all exponential
polynomial functors (including the "game functor"). As a more involved
application, involving additional non-trivial ideas, we also derive a
characterization theorem for the monotone modal mu-calculus, with respect to a
natural monadic second-order language for monotone neighborhood models.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1501.0721
FINITE H-DIMENSION DOES NOT IMPLY EXPRESSIVE COMPLETENESS
Accepted versio
Expressiveness of the modal mu-calculus on monotone neighborhood structures
We characterize the expressive power of the modal mu-calculus on monotone
neighborhood structures, in the style of the Janin-Walukiewicz theorem for the
standard modal mu-calculus. For this purpose we consider a monadic second-order
logic for monotone neighborhood structures. Our main result shows that the
monotone modal mu-calculus corresponds exactly to the fragment of this
second-order language that is invariant for neighborhood bisimulations
The succinctness of first-order logic on linear orders
Succinctness is a natural measure for comparing the strength of different
logics. Intuitively, a logic L_1 is more succinct than another logic L_2 if all
properties that can be expressed in L_2 can be expressed in L_1 by formulas of
(approximately) the same size, but some properties can be expressed in L_1 by
(significantly) smaller formulas.
We study the succinctness of logics on linear orders. Our first theorem is
concerned with the finite variable fragments of first-order logic. We prove
that:
(i) Up to a polynomial factor, the 2- and the 3-variable fragments of
first-order logic on linear orders have the same succinctness. (ii) The
4-variable fragment is exponentially more succinct than the 3-variable
fragment. Our second main result compares the succinctness of first-order logic
on linear orders with that of monadic second-order logic. We prove that the
fragment of monadic second-order logic that has the same expressiveness as
first-order logic on linear orders is non-elementarily more succinct than
first-order logic
Temporalized logics and automata for time granularity
Suitable extensions of the monadic second-order theory of k successors have
been proposed in the literature to capture the notion of time granularity. In
this paper, we provide the monadic second-order theories of downward unbounded
layered structures, which are infinitely refinable structures consisting of a
coarsest domain and an infinite number of finer and finer domains, and of
upward unbounded layered structures, which consist of a finest domain and an
infinite number of coarser and coarser domains, with expressively complete and
elementarily decidable temporal logic counterparts.
We obtain such a result in two steps. First, we define a new class of
combined automata, called temporalized automata, which can be proved to be the
automata-theoretic counterpart of temporalized logics, and show that relevant
properties, such as closure under Boolean operations, decidability, and
expressive equivalence with respect to temporal logics, transfer from component
automata to temporalized ones. Then, we exploit the correspondence between
temporalized logics and automata to reduce the task of finding the temporal
logic counterparts of the given theories of time granularity to the easier one
of finding temporalized automata counterparts of them.Comment: Journal: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming Journal Acronym:
TPLP Category: Paper for Special Issue (Verification and Computational Logic)
Submitted: 18 March 2002, revised: 14 Januari 2003, accepted: 5 September
200
- …